There should be a course that counters verificationism & logical positivism & doofusy stuff like “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” and supports things like “cumulative case to the best explanation”. It counters presuppositionalism at the same time it defends that you can arrive at unbiased (or correctly biased) truth while still holding a world view (although you may be persuaded to alter your worldview to align with where the evidence leads). It should include stuff like that video from Dr. Craig where he says there are certain things science cannot explain (much less prove… which is anything at all, if you have a stringent definition of proof, and realize that science deals in probability), but that are all rational to accept… on pain of rationality …starting at 1:24:
The course should honor the good parts from the various perspectives and communicate that they have valid concerns, kinda like this:
Nihilists will not settle for made up stuff.
Voluntarists will not settle for a lack of stuff, but they want control over it.
Essentialists honor them both, but affirm that co-creativity is where it’s at — where it’s always been (co-eternal… simultaneous co-causality).
(Oh, your brain’s getting wrapped around that one.)