PostModernism

From the Enlightenment…to Modernism, to Postmodernism…
Man’s attempt to “correct nature” - to humanize existence.

Unable to change things quickly enough nihilism uses semiotics to theoretically usurp nature by creating localized ulterior realities, founded on symbols/words - urban environments, within which language expresses shared lies, and humans are expected to perform as if they were true.
A “magical world”.
Within these “existential spatial/temporal pockets” man begins to linguistically fabricate his own reality.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhK6XOT3uAA[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bChKoll81r4[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ozPkaBeucU[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMlyaBTFh9g[/youtube]

The prevailing assumption that there is an ideology called “cultural Marxism”, or “Woke”, or “Postmodernism” (a term Jordan Peterson uses often) or “Communism”, that is antithetical to Liberalism, and is behind anti-Whiteness -------------------- is simply a consequence of lack of knowledge of the history of Marxism and Liberalism.

y.jpg

The postmodern, Woke, psychosis claims that even our appreciation of beauty is a social construct - determined by cultural and socioeconomic factors.
They claim that man is born a ‘blank slate’ - tabula rasa - with no innate impulses, determining biological standards, like the 7/10 hip to waist or chest ration or physical symmetry, proportionality, skin and hair texture, all markers of fitness.
In their desperate delusion they claim that men can be “nurtured” to consider anything beautiful, since there is no human nature, no species standards… and all value-judgements are social constructs.
Anti-nature - nihilistic to the core…and entirely delusional.


In their fanatical delusions they assume that even if it were possible to brainwash (indoctrinate, “nurture”) an individual from birth to believe that what is ugly is, in fact, beautiful - what is fat, or asymmetrical or disproportional is beautiful - that this would have no negative consequences, since they do not believe in objective standards …and they dismiss errors in judgement as a product of cultural conditioning. For them, there is no wrong judgement since ‘good judgements’ are socially engineered, and refer to judgments that agree with collective ideals…culturally determined…
In their psychotic minds a culture can emerge that consider 10/7 hip to waist/chest ration, and physical asymmetry and disproportionally, and blemished hair and skin, beautiful, and that this would have no negative consequences.
They believe that beauty is another culturally determined social construct…not naturally evolved as an appreciation of fitness markers, manifesting innate judgements, that produce offspring with survival and reproductive advantages, determined by natural order; contrary to subjective ideologically founded ideals of what is “just and inclusive and humanitarian.”

There’s a natural reason why physical symmetry & proportionality (beauty), psychological/cognitive symmetry and proportionality (charm), certain shapes and skin/hair textures are considered healthy and attractive.

in reading this morass of confused thinking,
I am reminded of a quote…

“If you can’t dazzle them with your brilliance,
dazzle them with your bullshit”

and there is a lot of bullshit here…

Kropotkin

GHWcR1pWMAAfIt_.jpg
Postmodernism is the one that wants to socially engineer its ideologically founded beauty standards.

Gnosticism => Judaism => Abrahamism => Marxism => Postmodernism.
The (=>) signifies an evolution - corruption, mutation, synthesis, development…

Genes to Memes.
Memes (ideologies, dogmas) follow the same processes genes follow…only instead of physical intercourse, exchanging and synthesizing genome codes, they use metal intercourse, exchanging and synthesizing linguistic codes.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkyVDKwVfHA[/youtube]

one day we will all become metrons

“In the 1950’s … Live was pretty good. And that is a problem for the far left.” (Steven Hicks).

Postmodernism is just another, newer form of nihilism, perhaps the last form of nihilism; it has become an empire of lies; even the word “post” in the word “postmodernism” is a lie; but because for postmodernism truth, knowledge, reality and the like do not matter, it can lie as much as it wants to (the better it lies, the further it comes).

Incidentally, Putin once pointed out that everything that the West has increasingly been practising since the 1960s had long been practised in the Soviet Union. For postmodernism and its relatives, this is probably all the more reason to continue with their de(con)struction.

Back to Hicks:

Has anyone read Hicks’ book “Explaining Postmodernism”?

mrs_open_society_of_the_lost_black_hole_and_miss_germany_of_the_universe

1 Like

Postmodernism denies all biological identifiers - all references to sensory input - so as to construct an alternate reality, ideologically founded.
All MUST become a “social construct”…meaning all must be a product of intersubjective consensus, replacing reason with emotion, or objectivity with subjective, emotional criteria.
Nothing we perceive should be trusted.
Where we see difference, there is uniformity.
Where there is asymmetry (ugliness), there is symmetry (beauty).

We are already beyond this silly postmodern denialism and ideological capture, things are transitioning well into the “hypermodern” so called. In this new phase, social constructs and anti-biologism are merely surface illusions used as psychological mind control over certain groups within the masses where such silly controlling memes actually have influence; the overall dialectic is instead built up such that every opposing view is pushed equally well including all forms of “right-wing” or “reactionary” views, as you see with the many YT-ers or talking heads now pushing anti-leftist propaganda and memes. You are an example of that group too, just one with a very limited audience.

Hypermodernism is all about cultivating and growing the dialectics, trapping the populace within left vs right thinking for example by clever use of sophisticated cultural warfare and mind control tectics including trauma-based agitprop false flags and NLP manipulations but also now moving into the realm of AI and algorithmic capture and control. You know nothing about any of this (except for your basic awareness of certain key psyops they have pulled off) because you are trapped within their dialectical control.

Hypermodern is also much more, because the REAL action is well above these layers of social manipulations including even the physical conflicts and media projections, rather what the real layer consists of is increasing development of advanced technologies of control that will soon encircle the entire globe and each of our lives within “smart environment” internet of everything panoptic systems that utilize AI and masas proliferations of sensors (including on and in your own body) to effect maximal control of the population. The lies of blockchain having served to push Bitcoin etc. as a “counter-system remedy” are just one example of this, biosecurity and digital convergences including the “covid jabs” are another. Before you know it everyone around you will be living 24/7 in a virtual world, surrounded by sensors (censors) and happily plugged into their own private Disney Borg Matrix. Well that depends where you live, I know certain regions will resist longer than others as well as certain demographics. But cultivating the tolerable margin-spaces is also a part of their overall system of control, which has been written about for many decades including with regard to “world integrated capitalism” which is at the root of the hypermodern.

Pushing one side of the dialectic or the underlying libertarian ethos in any of its forms is just part of the overall programming. What would it take to ACTUALLY analyze, understand and perhaps alter the trajectory of what is really going on? You have no idea, you could possibly have no idea whatsoever. But don’t feel bad, 99% of all humans are in the same boat as you. And we know how misery loves company, at least there’s that.