Pre and Post Truth and Falsity, Transcendence of True and False by Virtue of Occurence as Justification
The distinction of true and false is beyond true and false for the distinction of true and false are derived from a pre-truth/falsity event of distinction itself.
Furthermore the distinction of true or false are relative to the contexts of what is being derived or valued as true or false itself thus resulting in conditional values of what true and false are by degree of their relational nature.
Given truth and false are value distinctions, and value is derived from a pre-imposed context, the a nature of truth and falsity are but alignments between contexts, the alignment of the context derived as true or false with the context of by which said context is measured. In these respects true and false are alignments of contexts with a dualistic emergence of either true or false by emergence of alignment and degrees of true or false by degrees of alignment.
But what remains is distinction a pre-true and pre-false where true and false are but the distinction of alignment between distinctions.
In these respects a transcendental state to true and false exists by event of distinction itself where what is true or false is derived by nature of the event of the emergence and dissolution of the values of true or false.
Where true and false result in both binary distinction of if alignment exists, and gradative distinctions by degree of alignment, what remains is the event of distinction itself of alignment, non-alignment, partial alignment and the event of distinction itself as neither.
By nature the highest truth is one of alignment in context but a post truth and post falsity reality remains as the event of distinction itself.
What remains is distinction as transcendental of truth and falsity where the occurence of distinction is its justification by nature of its occurence.
The revelation of paradox or contradiction is but the revelation of the distinctions by which the paradox or contradiction is derived thus relegating paradox/contradiction as emergence of the distinctions that in itself derive them. By this degree a paradox and contradiction is necessary for identity and includes the paradox and contradiction of true and false;
By contradiction there is identity by contrast.
By paradox there is identity by containment.
Paradox and contradiction are thus necessary for truth and falsity, not just by mechanistic identity, but by the emergence of the distinction of each as itself.
The self application of each distinction results in the relative absence of the other as
-
The truth of truth results in falsity by gradience of truth as the space between truths.
-
The truth of truth results in falsity by negation of one truth as a relative falsity to another.
-
The false of false results in truth by gradience of falsity as the space between falsities.
-
The false of false results in truth by negation of one falsity as a relative truth to another.
In these respects true and false, as distinction oriented, are boundary assertion that have an inherent proto-geometric nature. What remains is a transcendental truth of occurence for regardless of differing degrees of occurence all occurences align as occurence and beyond and through these is distinction itself.