PROLEGOMENON TO A NEW COPERNICAN REVOLUTION

[ladyjane]

A new theory which makes man lose his privileged place as knower of the universe

gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo … ntred1.pdf
PROLEGOMENON TO A NEW COPERNICAN REVOLUTION
A NEW SCIENCE
MAN LOOSES HIS PRIVILEGED PLACE AT THE CENTRE OF THE UNIVERSE AS A PRIVILEGED KNOWER
MAN IS DECENTRED

There have been two major decentreing in the history of human thought. Copernicus and Freud. Copernicus took the earth from its place at the center of the universe- in other words he decentred the earth. Freud similarly took mans consciousness from the center of his experience – he decentred man. In other words Freud destroyed the belief that man can have an understanding of himself solely via his consciousness. Freud’s views of the unconscious decentred man from his place as an autonomous free thinking subject at the center of his world. A third decentreing has now occurred The situation is now that man has been decentred this time from his place as the privileged knower of the universe. MAN HAS LOST HIS PLACE AS THE CENTRAL REFERENCE POINT FOR THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE UNIVERSE. This because the very medium through which man uses to understand the universe i.e. language in fact falsifies the universe. Thus man looses his ability to be a privileged knower of the universe. With the inability of language to capture the totality of the known about the universe man ends up without any intellectual reference points and is thus decentred from his privilege place as the interpreter the universe- he is decentred from the universe. Man cannot know the universe as the language he uses to understand the universe at his previous centre only falsifies it .Mans language is not able to capture the totality of the known about the universe. For thousands of years man has thought that his language can unlock the secrets of the universe. But this is just blind arrogance in his belief of his own creation i.e. language as being a privileged medium through which to know the universe. Man can not know the universe as his language used to know it only falsifies the universe. This results in the death of man i.e. the death of asserting a privileged observer of the universe. All we have is an endless free play of words trying to capture the universe but all these words are man’s own creation which in fact falsifies the universe. WITH THE DECENTRING OF MAN FROM THE UNIVERSE WE HAVE NO GUARANTEED FACTS OR INTERPRETATIONS WHICH ARE AUTHORITIVE SINCE THE WORDS WE USE FOR THESE FACTS OR INTERPRETATIONS ONLY FALSIFY THE REFERENTS. The universe is now seen as being that which is produced by man via his culturally arbitrary conventional systems of signs i.e. language. What arrogance to think that this constructed human system is a privileged medium to know the universe? As if the totality of all knowledge about the universe is capture in our puny human words. A new science is called for where by we leave behind our language and concepts and embark upon a new way of seeing the universe. Operationalism was one such way of knowing without the use of language as such. Mysticism was another . It is time for a new science

[Pandora]

But operationalism would still be confined to:

@ladyjane

The universe is now seen as being that which is produced by man via his culturally arbitrary conventional systems of signs i.e. language

and

@ladyjane

As if the totality of all knowledge about the universe is capture in our puny human words.

I mean, since you’ve mentioned

@ladyjane

What arrogance to think that this constructed human system is a privileged medium to know the universe?

and

@ladyjane

For thousands of years man has thought that his language can unlock the secrets of the universe. But this is just blind arrogance in his belief of his own creation i.e. language as being a privileged medium through which to know the universe. Man can not know the universe as his language used to know it only falsifies the universe.

[ladyjane]

i see you are thinking pandora
operationalism was a start as it made the concept less important that what operations measure it
so then it was a beginning to view the universe without words -which are just man made

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operationalization

Operationalization is the process of defining a concept as the operations that will measure the concept (variables) through specific observations.

Each concept is defined by the measuring operations used.

Bridgman notes that in the theory of relativity we see how concepts like “length” and “duration” split into actually different concepts. As part of the process of refining a physical theory, it may be found that what was one concept is, in fact, two or more distinct concepts. However, Bridgman proposes that if we only stick to operationally defined concepts, this will never happen.

Thus, a breakthrough in science was achieved by examining the operational definitions of scientific measurements.

yes o[erationalism would still be confined to the world of words -but with one difference the words lose their place as defining reality for all they are really are just operations
ie we think man female are related to some essence that defines them but all these words are really are only the operation which the man female entail
when you do that for ever word what have you -a wordless characterisation of reality

we at the moment think the world is made up atoms
but
atoms are just the operations that measure them -they dont really exist outside of the operations that measure them -thus the universe has ceased to be made up of atoms-man concepts al there is are things which our operations measure