Wrong. Read up, or jog on!
Yes Africans invented irrigation
1 Like
Ha!!!
Remember…you are dealing with a white supremacist who is claiming whites invented EVERYTHING.
Google Genius, you are…here’s a google search result for ya…
For as long as humans have needed to exchange goods, they’ve traded with each other, be it through grain futures in ancient Mesopotamia in 2260 B.C. or contracts on tulip bulb bubbles in Dutch Haarlem in the 17th century. What we think of as modern trading has a far shorter history.
Genius…it doesn’t matter if it’s plus/minus a few thousands years…the topic is about races.
How did they evovle…not socially constructed…evolved.
I guess that’s why they developed such complex irrigation systems and cultivated so much food to feed their enormous sophisticated civilizations.
Irrigation was invented in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia around 6000 BCE. Farmers in these regions would divert and direct floodwaters from the Nile, Tigris, and Euphrates rivers to their crops. While specific individuals aren’t credited, the practice of diverting water to crops emerged in these early civilizations.
Manchild, when I say sub-Saharans…who am I talking about?
Africa is a continent…northern Africa is not where Blacks come from.
Humans arrived in Australia 40,000 years ago.
Without the help of guns, medicine, or any of the gimcracks of white technology, they conquered the land of the most dangerous spiders and snakes on earth, and from the most simple subsistence became fitter and stronger than any modern white man.
White clowns of the West might pat themselves on the back and take credit for “inventions” they they are too stupid to understand, and had no part in, but the native peoples of Australia had things sorted before whitey came on the scene in Europe.
Aboriginees, (before the white man came with guns that the shooters themsleves were clueless about in terms of technology, ) had a better healthier life than any of the scurvy crew that started shooting.
They’d had more leasure time, and a richer connection with the land and their own culture.
Arrogant twats, sitting on theit spotty backsides, squeezing zits on their computers think themselves so superior but these coloured fellows had their lives sorted.
Who is “superior”. And fuckwit can pull a trigger, and I’m pretty sure those coloured fellows are pretty good shots.
Is sustainability were the criterion of success, then they were superior.
A moron driving a speedboat might kill a dolphin, but that does not make the moron superior
1 Like
Manchild…nobody said Europeans are superior, nor that they have the highest median IQ, nor that they invented EVERYTHING…the topic is on whether races were caused by trade, socioeconomic factors, in the last 6-10 thousand years, or by natural selection, including 80,000 years before there were settlements, or farming, or trading?
Manchild…mankind is resilient.,…this has nothing to do with why higher median IQ’s developed in certain populations and not others, resulting in some racial ethnic groups dominating the others with their superior technologies.
None of this implies some groups had NO technologies…do…you…understand?
Meathead…do you understand?
No?
Man you are thick…
It’s all accidental, then…what the fuck are you on?
What the fuck kind a mind do you have?
You vote with that brain?
Zero reasoning…zero objectivity…all emotion.
Man…democracy just does not work…and you are my evidence.
This manchild is bonkers…so Europeans and Asians were not sustainable?
Europeans and Asians did not go through the phase these Aborigines and Negroes got stuck in?
How did they survive long enough to create their superior weapons, then?
Magic…god…aliens?
They did not conquer their environments?
What applies to Europeans and Asians but not to sub-Saharan Negroes and aborigines?
What factors are different, explaining both their obvious physical and mental differences, and their subsequent history?
Aborigines had it “sorted out”…what the fuck?
Like the blacks in Africa, right?
Mud huts, and canoes…
With super soakers and graffiti…with twerking and rapping techniques?
Evidently, it was not enough to defend from superior technologies, now was it?
You people are fucked in the head.
Fanatical…emotional…brainwashed.
What’s the point discussing anything with minds like this?
Desperate again.
You really need to stick with what is actually going on in the discussion.
Dates for the inititial conquest of Australia by humans is now as far back as 70kbp.
It looks like “white culture” is set to fuck up the entire planet due to what has been happening in the last 300 years.
When Whitey can claim to live sustainably that long then maybe.
Exactly.
I’d not bet on you in a fight with one either.
Then why don’t you run along, and have a wank to your White God, Trump.?
Egypt is Africain case you had not realised
Are you American? Because you are clueless about history and geography
What a douche-bag…how do you know I am white?
How do you know I am pro-Trump?
You don’t.
All you know is your American experience with white Christians and rednecks…and you ASSUME that I am one.
This is how idiotic you are.
Never claimed any race was superior…never claimed “whites,” whatever the fuck that means, invented everything.
But you don’t care…because you have your prepared talking points, don’t ya retard?
Yes, Africa is a manmade designation, you idiot…Egyptians are not blacks, but they are in Africa.
When we speak of sub-Saharan Negroes, we do not mean Algerians, Tunisians, the Berbers, or the Semites…we mean a specific RACE, idiot.
The race is not called “black” nor is it called African…it is called Negroid…and the Asians are called Mongoloid, and the whites are called Caucasoid…
Arabs and Indians are in ASIA, moron…yet they are not Chinese.
They live on the same continent…like Negroes and Berbers…
This moron thinks intelligence has to do with brain size…wow.
Whales have huge brains…are they smarter than humans?
Well smarter than Sculptor, for sure…but the average human?
So, dolphins are superior to humans, right?
They are set up right in the seas…right?
Hey Careless, read this…
If only the heirarchy of evolution had fuck all to do with technology..
You two can debate this absurdity…let the comedy begin.
I’ll be watching.
Your simplicity, Sculptor, is tiresome.
Very professional from the forum owner. Are you upset that I am using the very emojis you setup for this place?
It must really bother you, being ignored.
What is the pinnacle of creation??
It is the cold declares the Snowman.
No it is the ability to live in water says the shark.
The largest brain on Earth belongs to the sperm whale. The adult sperm whale brain is 8000 cm3, which is more than five times the volume of ours, a comparably small 1300 cm3. A sperm whale’s brain weighs up to 9kg (almost 20lbs) which is 6 times heavier than a human brain.
I think science agrees with Sculptor…humans are NOT the dominant species on earth…
I would love for he and Careless to discuss how technology has “fuck all to do” with intelligence…because aborigine were ‘doing just fine,’ before evil whitey arrived with his guns and sailing ships and all that useless shit.
Obviously…
HA!!!
1 Like
Conclusions
Using a large modern dataset with top tier neurological data from MRI, we were able to confirm existing hereditarian-minded research on the relationship between brain measures and intelligence.
The accuracy of this model was surprisingly high, but some of this was related to ancestry confounding that had also previously been explored by other researchers. Using the White subsample of the data is sufficient to remove this, but beware of variance differences in test samples.
Race gaps show up on these modern predictions of intelligence based on brain data where the model has never seen a non-White person, and they are quite large.
The MRI-model can account for about a third of the observed intelligence gaps (36% for Black-White).
The extended Spearman’s hypothesis was seen whereby g-loadings (of the MRI predictors) relates positively to group differences (Black-White, Hispanic-White gaps), and polygenic score validities (heritabilities).
The hereditarian research paradigm keeps being productive, generating new and interesting results in modern data."
…
" POPULATION GROUP DIFFERENCES
Brain Size
Even before birth, population group differences in average brain size are found from the ninth week of intrauterine life. Schultz (1922) found that 455 White fetuses averaged larger brain cases and smaller faces than did 168 Black fetuses, with the differences becoming more prominent over the course of fetal development. Other traits were found, with Black fetuses averaging a longer forearm to upper arm ratio, a characteristic of Black adults, and a longer fourth to second finger ratio, also characteristic of Black adults (Manning, Citation2002).
Rushton (Citation1997) analyzed population group differences from birth to age 7 years using measurements of head circumference and GMA gathered on 40,000 children by the U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Project (Broman et al., Citation1987). The results showed that at birth, 4 months, 1 year, and 7 years, the East Asian children averaged larger cranial volumes than White children who averaged larger cranial volumes than Black children (
). Within each group, children with larger head sizes obtained higher IQ scores. Moreover, the East Asian children, who averaged the largest craniums, were the shortest in stature and the lightest in weight, whereas the Black children, who averaged the smallest craniums, were the tallest in stature and the heaviest in weight; the differences in brain size were not due to body size."
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207450802325843
1 Like
The measure is brain mass relative to body mass.