Such desperation
Supersoakersā¦corn rows, graffiti, twerking, jazz, peanut butterā¦traffic lightsā¦
Blacks gave us so muchā¦whites?
Nada.
You forgot Sowellās intellectual contributions.
Didnāt your google search bring it up?
Haā¦super soakersā¦fucking incredible.
This guy measures quality by how much money it makesā¦bravo sirā¦
Bravoā¦you must be an African Americanā¦that IQ is hard to mistake.
Iāve met and know many black people in my time but Iāve never known one as low rent as you.
Super soakerā¦that one was a doozyā¦
Fuck manā¦your mind is amazingā¦never change.
Super soakerā¦wow.
Well, those dirty capitalists did create the global capitalism we have today with unlimited mass foreign immigration, so thereās that. We can blame them for something.
But they did not cause the diverse racesā¦no matter how much you Marxists want to believe otherwise.
Race is not a social constructā¦in fact trade would inhibit the development of races and would create multiracial classes.
Iāve never said race is a social construct, I believe in things like biology and evolution.
Economic class is a social construct, race or ethnicity is simple biology would be how I would argue things.
The neoliberals ruin everything they touch including adopting some Marxist ideas which they donāt understand at all. They decided to pretend that race and ethnicity was a social construct in their project of transforming entire western nations into economic financial zones coming up with the notion that entire populations are interchangeable in the name of expanding finance capitalism. They had to come up with the most bizarre sugar coated bullshit possible to wrap up capitalistic economic exploitation in a nice pretty bow and transforming race along with ethnicity into a social construct was part of that whole process.
Iām not talking about nurture, Iām talking about the genetic underpinning of homo sapiensā intelligence being driven by intra-species competition and not climate-based adversity. Neanderthals and bears do just fine in the cold, but the more intelligent members of sapiensā groups reproduced more successfully.
The existence of ring species shows that this is false.
I am, and what happened is that the superabundant area of the world that became mythologized as the Garden of Eden, which also sat at the crossroads of human migration and early human trade, saw the rise of the first concentrations of wealth, which enabled specialization, social stratification, scholarship, etc.
Compare Stonehenge (c. 2600 BCE) to megaliths at Nabta Playa (c. 5000 BCE). At the edges of the network, humans look about the same, regardless of whether or not their mom was a neanderthal.
Again, it was paradise at the time the civilizations you are pointing to developed. Those civilizations developed at that place, in that time, because it was 1) paradise, and 2) at the crossroads of all human migration out of Africa, which made it the early hub of all human land trade routes.
Your model is that leaving Africa enriched sapiens minds (but not neanderthals because ???), and then those sapiens fucked some neanderthals and got magic neanderthal powers (which didnāt help the neanderthals because ???), and then they migrated back to just outside of Africa (because ???) in order to found civilization ā which they did with raw brain power alone, unrelated to the abundance of paradise or the benefits of trade.
OMG, what % Native American are you!
Nothing as satisfying as tearing someoneās worldview to such small shreds that the only rebuttal they can muster is this weak shit.
Keep losing.
You have crushed him. But he does not have the wit to realise it.
And that is the trouble with faith based belief; rather than something based on reason
āMan is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones.ā Russell.
Iām not talking about nurture, Iām talking about the genetic underpinning of homo sapiensā intelligence being driven by intra-species competition and not climate-based adversity. Neanderthals and bears do just fine in the cold, but the more intelligent members of sapiensā groups reproduced more successfully.
There you go again, intra-species competition.
Intelligence does not only require intra-species competition, it is the result of environmental stressors.
There is no speciation without isolation.
A population requires time to breed isolated, otherwise all the advantageous mutations are distributedā¦they do not remain distinct to that population.
The fact that we can identify and distinguish Asians, from Africans from Europeans means a period of isolation occurredā¦otherwise there would be no differences.
These differences are not cosmeticā¦they include the brainā¦they include every aspect of the human organism.
This is supported by the fact that sub-Saharan humans never developed anything comparable to the civilizations enveloped in Mesopotamia, and the Yellow Riverā¦
The advanced populations dominated and enslaved the dominatedā¦
A lower range of IQ can have profound consequencesā¦look at what a 3% difference between humans and chimpanzees produces.
This is getting nowhereā¦your indoctrination and liberalism is so thick it will not yield to reason.
TRADE started 3,000 years agoā¦this is not enough time to produce the racial disparities we witness and continue despite numerous attempts to ācorrect them.ā
Over 80,0000 years of natural selection, was merely exacerbated by economics, not created out of nowhere.
No philosophy, no technology, no engineering, no scientific insight, no spirituality, nothing of any quality in the artsā¦nothing developed in the sub-Sahara that could be considered remotely the equal of what developed outside Africaā¦and it continues.
Have you heard of something that came out of Africa that revolutionized human thinking?
Any African physicistsā¦Nobel Prize winnersā¦anything?
The superior colonizes and exploits the inferiorā¦this is a law of nature.
Is it ethical?
Depending on what ethical standard you useā¦we are using Abrahamism, no?
How much slavery is there in the Bible?
Itās time to grow up, Carleasā¦and become a manā¦you remain a naive boyā¦full of idealism.
you donāt have to like it, or tolerate itā¦just acknowledge it as a fact, and then move on and tell us what can be done about it, to create your Utopia.
Again, it was paradise at the time the civilizations you are pointing to developed. Those civilizations developed at that place, in that time, because it was 1) paradise, and 2) at the crossroads of all human migration out of Africa, which made it the early hub of all human land trade routes.
Againā¦civilizations developed after races had developedā¦AFTERā¦
There was no civilization there, or anywhere, and so human populations moved to populate the entire globe.
Your model is that leaving Africa enriched sapiens minds (but not neanderthals because ???), and then those sapiens fucked some neanderthals and got magic neanderthal powers (which didnāt help the neanderthals because ???), and then they migrated back to just outside of Africa (because ???) in order to found civilization ā which they did with raw brain power alone, unrelated to the abundance of paradise or the benefits of trade.
An example of two sub-species competingā¦and the homo sapient emerged the victor BECAUSE it was more creative, more adaptive in that environment - more fit, producing more offspring it could feed, overpowering with numbers a sub-species that was more physically powerful.
The entire environment is the stressors, not only other members of your kindā¦everything, EVERYTHING is a stressors.
There cannot be speciation without a period of isolationā¦use your fuckinā head.
The advantageous mutations, such as higher IQ, would be distributed within a population that could inter-breed, which may have caused the disappearance of Neanderthals. they were absorbed into the more numerous homo sapiens.
Neanderthals are an example of a hominid sub-species, which is what races areā¦maybe not as genetically separated, but on their way.
Trade mixes, creating uniformityā¦separating along classesā¦not genetics.
I know it ruins your humanitarian lefty ideals, but who cares what you iamgine or hoped for.
Just the fact that we can discern shared physical AND psychological differences, manifesting in impulsivity, athletics, academics, creativityā¦suffices.
Sub-Saharan populations did not have to evolve much, and so they didnāt, whereas populations that were forced out of Africa were pressured to adapt, or dieā¦and they survivedā¦the most creative, adaptive.
Neanderthals were on the same level as sub-Saharan humans, during that period.
The splintering of human races was occurring during that periodā¦and for 80,000 yearsā¦70,000 BEFORE any settlements or trade existedā¦naive Marxist.
Even after settlements and civilizations emerged inter-group, racial/ethnic competition continued the process, but inter-breeding begins on a low scale.
OMG, what % Native American are you!
0ā¦Iām 98% European and 2% Middle-eastern, most probably Iranianā¦so 100% Indo-European.
Now I leave you to declare victory, with your intellectual equalā¦Sculptor.
Super soakersā¦peanut butterā¦graffiti artistsā¦twerkingā¦rappingā¦
I stand correctedā¦Africans were superior.
No one is claiming that numbnuts.
But you might want to consider that the most impactful and important inventions were made by non-whites.
FIRE.
pottery
bronze making
iron making
swords, spears.
bow and arrow
Crossbow
The WHEEL - potters wheel and cartwheel
Domestication of dogs, sheep, cows, pigs, camels⦠Oh everything now domesticated!
horse riding
castles
Agriculture. YES FUCKING AGRICULTURE.
Irrigation.
gunpowder
weaving, sowing ,shoemaking
felt, silk, cotton..
Iām getting bored with this.
Your model is that leaving Africa enriched sapiens minds (but not neanderthals because ???), and then those sapiens fucked some neanderthals and got magic neanderthal powers (which didnāt help the neanderthals because ???), and then they migrated back to just outside of Africa (because ???) in order to found civilization ā which they did with raw brain power alone, unrelated to the abundance of paradise or the benefits of trade.
My theory was breeding with Neanderthal gave Africans a boost. But the website I posted to Silenus says Neanderthals were mainly in Australia. So idk. It seems like a side-theory.
The AI says that cold boosts brain size and intelligence. The quote I posted says brain size and puts a woke disclaimer ābrain size doesnāt always correlate to intelligenceā. Its an indisputable fact that cold boosts brain size. It is cold that is the main factor here, neanderthal is a side-tangent side-theory side-show only.
Now, the AI also said that cold boosts intelligence, however I had to reboot my PC and so I cannot paste the convo. I was pretty sure AI said that cold boosts intelligence (not just brain size) and if it wasnāt Ai, then it was some scientific website but it is now lost to the ether.
Yes, thatās why they dominatedā¦all those inventionsā¦in addition to super soakers.
Gun powder?
What?
Africans invented gunpowder?
Irrigation?
Africans invented bronze making?
Are you daft?
he said non-whites.
Heās debating someone elseā¦
The white supremacists in his head.
HA!!!
Race is NOT a social constructā¦and itās obvious to those whoa are not indoctrinated into a naive self-comforting ideology and are not governed by emotions.
Adverse environments naturally select the traits that advatage survivalā¦IQ being a formidable set of traits.
Poor Scuptor....his Africans have nothing to show so he turns to Asians to fight the white supremacists in his tiny brain.
Ha!!!
He cannot see how he is proving my pointā¦
Heās not so smart, is he?