Race and Technology

Such desperation

Supersoakers…corn rows, graffiti, twerking, jazz, peanut butter…traffic lights…
Blacks gave us so much…whites?
Nada.
You forgot Sowell’s intellectual contributions.
Didn’t your google search bring it up?
Ha…super soakers…fucking incredible.
:joy:
This guy measures quality by how much money it makes…bravo sir…

Bravo…you must be an African American…that IQ is hard to mistake.

1 Like

I’ve met and know many black people in my time but I’ve never known one as low rent as you.

Super soaker…that one was a doozy…

Fuck man…your mind is amazing…never change.
Super soaker…wow.

Well, those dirty capitalists did create the global capitalism we have today with unlimited mass foreign immigration, so there’s that. We can blame them for something.

1 Like

But they did not cause the diverse races…no matter how much you Marxists want to believe otherwise.
Race is not a social construct…in fact trade would inhibit the development of races and would create multiracial classes.

1 Like

I’ve never said race is a social construct, I believe in things like biology and evolution.

Economic class is a social construct, race or ethnicity is simple biology would be how I would argue things.

The neoliberals ruin everything they touch including adopting some Marxist ideas which they don’t understand at all. They decided to pretend that race and ethnicity was a social construct in their project of transforming entire western nations into economic financial zones coming up with the notion that entire populations are interchangeable in the name of expanding finance capitalism. They had to come up with the most bizarre sugar coated bullshit possible to wrap up capitalistic economic exploitation in a nice pretty bow and transforming race along with ethnicity into a social construct was part of that whole process.

2 Likes

I’m not talking about nurture, I’m talking about the genetic underpinning of homo sapiens’ intelligence being driven by intra-species competition and not climate-based adversity. Neanderthals and bears do just fine in the cold, but the more intelligent members of sapiens’ groups reproduced more successfully.

The existence of ring species shows that this is false.

I am, and what happened is that the superabundant area of the world that became mythologized as the Garden of Eden, which also sat at the crossroads of human migration and early human trade, saw the rise of the first concentrations of wealth, which enabled specialization, social stratification, scholarship, etc.

Compare Stonehenge (c. 2600 BCE) to megaliths at Nabta Playa (c. 5000 BCE). At the edges of the network, humans look about the same, regardless of whether or not their mom was a neanderthal.

Again, it was paradise at the time the civilizations you are pointing to developed. Those civilizations developed at that place, in that time, because it was 1) paradise, and 2) at the crossroads of all human migration out of Africa, which made it the early hub of all human land trade routes.

Your model is that leaving Africa enriched sapiens minds (but not neanderthals because ???), and then those sapiens fucked some neanderthals and got magic neanderthal powers (which didn’t help the neanderthals because ???), and then they migrated back to just outside of Africa (because ???) in order to found civilization – which they did with raw brain power alone, unrelated to the abundance of paradise or the benefits of trade.

OMG, what % Native American are you! :feather::dna: :heart_eyes:

1 Like

Nothing as satisfying as tearing someone’s worldview to such small shreds that the only rebuttal they can muster is this weak shit.
Screenshot 2025-05-24 23.58.54
Keep losing.

1 Like

You have crushed him. But he does not have the wit to realise it.
And that is the trouble with faith based belief; rather than something based on reason
ā€œMan is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones.ā€ Russell.

I’m not talking about nurture, I’m talking about the genetic underpinning of homo sapiens’ intelligence being driven by intra-species competition and not climate-based adversity. Neanderthals and bears do just fine in the cold, but the more intelligent members of sapiens’ groups reproduced more successfully.

There you go again, intra-species competition.
Intelligence does not only require intra-species competition, it is the result of environmental stressors.

There is no speciation without isolation.
A population requires time to breed isolated, otherwise all the advantageous mutations are distributed…they do not remain distinct to that population.
The fact that we can identify and distinguish Asians, from Africans from Europeans means a period of isolation occurred…otherwise there would be no differences.
These differences are not cosmetic…they include the brain…they include every aspect of the human organism.
This is supported by the fact that sub-Saharan humans never developed anything comparable to the civilizations enveloped in Mesopotamia, and the Yellow River…
The advanced populations dominated and enslaved the dominated…
A lower range of IQ can have profound consequences…look at what a 3% difference between humans and chimpanzees produces.

This is getting nowhere…your indoctrination and liberalism is so thick it will not yield to reason.

TRADE started 3,000 years ago…this is not enough time to produce the racial disparities we witness and continue despite numerous attempts to ā€œcorrect them.ā€
Over 80,0000 years of natural selection, was merely exacerbated by economics, not created out of nowhere.
No philosophy, no technology, no engineering, no scientific insight, no spirituality, nothing of any quality in the arts…nothing developed in the sub-Sahara that could be considered remotely the equal of what developed outside Africa…and it continues.
Have you heard of something that came out of Africa that revolutionized human thinking?
Any African physicists…Nobel Prize winners…anything?

The superior colonizes and exploits the inferior…this is a law of nature.
Is it ethical?
Depending on what ethical standard you use…we are using Abrahamism, no?
How much slavery is there in the Bible?

It’s time to grow up, Carleas…and become a man…you remain a naive boy…full of idealism.
you don’t have to like it, or tolerate it…just acknowledge it as a fact, and then move on and tell us what can be done about it, to create your Utopia.

Again, it was paradise at the time the civilizations you are pointing to developed. Those civilizations developed at that place, in that time, because it was 1) paradise, and 2) at the crossroads of all human migration out of Africa, which made it the early hub of all human land trade routes.

Again…civilizations developed after races had developed…AFTER…
There was no civilization there, or anywhere, and so human populations moved to populate the entire globe.

Your model is that leaving Africa enriched sapiens minds (but not neanderthals because ???), and then those sapiens fucked some neanderthals and got magic neanderthal powers (which didn’t help the neanderthals because ???), and then they migrated back to just outside of Africa (because ???) in order to found civilization – which they did with raw brain power alone, unrelated to the abundance of paradise or the benefits of trade.

An example of two sub-species competing…and the homo sapient emerged the victor BECAUSE it was more creative, more adaptive in that environment - more fit, producing more offspring it could feed, overpowering with numbers a sub-species that was more physically powerful.

The entire environment is the stressors, not only other members of your kind…everything, EVERYTHING is a stressors.
There cannot be speciation without a period of isolation…use your fuckin’ head.
The advantageous mutations, such as higher IQ, would be distributed within a population that could inter-breed, which may have caused the disappearance of Neanderthals. they were absorbed into the more numerous homo sapiens.

Neanderthals are an example of a hominid sub-species, which is what races are…maybe not as genetically separated, but on their way.
Trade mixes, creating uniformity…separating along classes…not genetics.

I know it ruins your humanitarian lefty ideals, but who cares what you iamgine or hoped for.
Just the fact that we can discern shared physical AND psychological differences, manifesting in impulsivity, athletics, academics, creativity…suffices.
Sub-Saharan populations did not have to evolve much, and so they didn’t, whereas populations that were forced out of Africa were pressured to adapt, or die…and they survived…the most creative, adaptive.

Neanderthals were on the same level as sub-Saharan humans, during that period.
The splintering of human races was occurring during that period…and for 80,000 years…70,000 BEFORE any settlements or trade existed…naive Marxist.
Even after settlements and civilizations emerged inter-group, racial/ethnic competition continued the process, but inter-breeding begins on a low scale.

OMG, what % Native American are you!

0…I’m 98% European and 2% Middle-eastern, most probably Iranian…so 100% Indo-European.

Now I leave you to declare victory, with your intellectual equal…Sculptor.

Super soakers…peanut butter…graffiti artists…twerking…rapping…
I stand corrected…Africans were superior.

1 Like

No one is claiming that numbnuts.

But you might want to consider that the most impactful and important inventions were made by non-whites.

FIRE.
pottery
bronze making
iron making
swords, spears.
bow and arrow
Crossbow
The WHEEL - potters wheel and cartwheel
Domestication of dogs, sheep, cows, pigs, camels… Oh everything now domesticated!
horse riding
castles
Agriculture. YES FUCKING AGRICULTURE.
Irrigation.
gunpowder
weaving, sowing ,shoemaking
felt, silk, cotton..

I’m getting bored with this.

Your model is that leaving Africa enriched sapiens minds (but not neanderthals because ???), and then those sapiens fucked some neanderthals and got magic neanderthal powers (which didn’t help the neanderthals because ???), and then they migrated back to just outside of Africa (because ???) in order to found civilization – which they did with raw brain power alone, unrelated to the abundance of paradise or the benefits of trade.

My theory was breeding with Neanderthal gave Africans a boost. But the website I posted to Silenus says Neanderthals were mainly in Australia. So idk. It seems like a side-theory.

The AI says that cold boosts brain size and intelligence. The quote I posted says brain size and puts a woke disclaimer ā€œbrain size doesn’t always correlate to intelligenceā€. Its an indisputable fact that cold boosts brain size. It is cold that is the main factor here, neanderthal is a side-tangent side-theory side-show only.

Now, the AI also said that cold boosts intelligence, however I had to reboot my PC and so I cannot paste the convo. I was pretty sure AI said that cold boosts intelligence (not just brain size) and if it wasn’t Ai, then it was some scientific website but it is now lost to the ether.

Yes, that’s why they dominated…all those inventions…in addition to super soakers.

Gun powder?
What?
Africans invented gunpowder?
Irrigation?
Africans invented bronze making?

Are you daft?

1 Like

he said non-whites.

He’s debating someone else…
The white supremacists in his head.

HA!!!
:squinting_face_with_tongue:

2 Likes

Race is NOT a social construct…and it’s obvious to those whoa are not indoctrinated into a naive self-comforting ideology and are not governed by emotions.

Adverse environments naturally select the traits that advatage survival…IQ being a formidable set of traits.

1 Like

Poor Scuptor....his Africans have nothing to show so he turns to Asians to fight the white supremacists in his tiny brain.
Ha!!!

He cannot see how he is proving my point…
He’s not so smart, is he?