Mirror mirror on the wall…
First Peewee, and now the Grimm bros, why not take a rest.
Is the only way to get kindness out of you to pay you $100 an hour for it?
Did you ever hear the phrase “pay attention;” that’s one way.
My apologies.
TheAdlerian
I am talking about adult sex education. what to have sex with and what not to have sex with. i.e you do not have sex with animals because they are of different species. just as you do not have sex with alien races because they are of difference races.
the whole purpose of production is to continue our line. what is our line? what continues from our ancestors to our forefathers to our fathers down to us? the only identity, after contemplation is the RACE. our ancestors and us are of the same race. if you mate with someone of different race, you no longer continue the line of your fathers, your line dies out, an alien race emerges out of your ashes.
you are free to spoil your race and defile it. for you bring shame upon your ancestors who made you in their racial image. you have lost the only living connection, namely the race that link you with your ancestors. what disrespect! how disgraceful!
my real name
I was only mildly inspired by Mein Kampf, the race theories I put forward are entirely my own.
Pinnacle of Reason,
I think this point is nagging at me about your position. With any match, the next generation will be only half of your own (and your ancestors’) genetic identity. Why does it matter any more to your ancestors when no more than half of their identity can be passed on in any case?
Looked at that way, what then is the value of making descendants of two halves of the same race/culture? Isn’t diversity then better for the descendants: first to prevent inbreeding, and second to identify with more than one culture?
By the way, how is De Anima going?
Regards,
mrn
…3/4 continental, 1/4 analytic, and 100% Thomist
my real name
how so, what does mathematics have anything to do with biology. are you and your parents not of the same race!!! I know I am. so I know who I am like Jesus before me. the ancestors passed on their entire racial identity onto me, and I am to continue their line, unspoiled. I mean white color mixed with white color produces white color, black the same… but gray will never be black nor white, it is a color in itself. just as the bastards are a race in themselves.
the same can be said, what does it matter if we are all traitors? diversity meaning tolerance is unnatural. if you see something is wrong you ought to do something about it, and not sit on your arse and call it tolerance. inbreeding? ok, let’s all mix. what happen if we are all mixed into one mud pool. how are we to diversify then, do we start mixing with different species? to identity with more than one culture means one does not identify with the original culture strongly. but half as passionate about the origins. which is cowardice.
De Anima
Aristotle is wrong. His version of the soul is totally uncontemplatated rubbish. it stinks. I’ll prove it tomorrow.
meaning Thomist is a bastard.
Are not German, French, and English all whites? (…Which is what I am.)
And if you are a Catholic, are you not a Thomist?
Forgive the man, for he does not know what he says.
mrn
I am half my father’s race and half my mother’s race. Accidentally, they are similar. But their origins can never be exactly the same – only similar.
You are really down on “bastards”. Just curious, why do you imply people do not pass on their genetics and culture if their parents were not within wedlock?
Are you a “social Darwinist” believing tolerance is unnatural?
Isn’t cowardice a lack of courage? What should we be more courageous about – relative cultures or absolute truth? But, truely, all peoples can share the truth. (I hope, as a Catholic, you agree with this.)
What is the value of diversity to those in the “mud pool”? Have they not achieved the mean? (For Aristotle, the virtue is a mean.) Further, are they not more diverse within themselves, if diversity is a virtue?
Further, I await your response to Aristotle’s work on the soul. Perhaps we should put that discussion in a separate topic under Psychology?
mrn
I once had a prison inmate ask me, “why are religious people talking about fucking all of the time. I mean I like it, but it’s not my number one thought. Do you think they’re perverts?”
“Hmmmm…,” I answered.
That is really strange. Don’t the non-religious talk about “it” too?
MRN
tolerance is unnatural. anyway, the purpose of this thread is to show that race exist. and it certainly does, if you believe race exist then no point continue this post any further. I’ll open another thread tomorrow on the soul.
right on brother. as Catholics we stand under the guidance of our mighty father and with the help of the Holy Spirit, our wisdom is infinite and the truth that dance from our tongues are eternal. We have won a decise victory over the heathens over the truth that race exist, a truth they attempt to pervert.
Race exist and it links our to our ancestors and as a living link it ought be treasured and preserved.
Not in the same way.
Sorry, Pinnacle, but I’m not with you on tolerance being unnatural – at least no more so than it is un-supernatural. (And man is supernatural.)
I have posited that races exist in my last post (more for argument’s sake), but I still don’t see what the use of them is, unless tied to culture. And I’m still not sure why having only one culture is a cultural advantage to an individual – is it rather an advantage to their culture? Again, I suggest that truth transcends cultures, and that is with what man qua rational animal is primarily concerned. It sounds very last-mannish to me (in a virtue ethics sense), this concern for cultures – except insofar as they are mediums of understanding.
Maybe if i ever marry, i will be certain to marry someone from another race, so the next generation will be less likely to indulge in the sin of racism. What matters is that they are committed to the human race.
mrn
Hey what about that old [is-ought problem] eh?
Just because tolerance IS unatural that doesn’t mean that tolerence shouldn’t get practiced.
Is brushing your teeth natural? No, but it is still a good idea that produces practical benefits.
Considering the consequences, tolerance is better than intolerance. Unless individual freedom is not the goal.
xanderman
precisely my point, we are to subvert our own desire for the greater good of the continuation of our race.
TheAdlerian
yes, in the same way.
my real name
to tolerate is to say there are things you find distasteful but you do nothing about it because you ‘tolerate it’. are we to tolerate sin, lies, hate, Satan??? no, we are to fight for Christ and the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church handed down through the Church fathers down to us. and we are to continue their glorious tradition of love and faith to our children and children’s children, so that we in the eternal litergy of racial integrity preserves our link, not only in faith but also in race.
I have explained to you that race is have nothing to do with advantage but that it is a matter of identity that links us to our ancestors. being attached to one culture because you love your culture, you love your people, and you honor your ancestors. race is different to culture, culture can be changed and changed back, but if race is changed, it is gone forever. and we forever sever our racial link to our ancestors.
I am sorry to hear that and I feel sad. If you intermarry with a foreign race so as you next generation would indulge in less racism is a simple stupid fantasy. What is racism but a love of your own race? As I explained ealier, if you see a dog attacking a man, you help the man because your human instinct is at work. similarly if you see one race attacking your own, you would help your own, your racial instinct at work. the expression of racial instinct as human instinct is discrimination and is perfectly natural and acceptable. your bastard will hate you because you have created him alien, as an alien being that does not belong in any race, having no racial group to belong in but in that muddled puddle called mixed ancestry. a group of aliens whom are individuals in that they are of alien races, a complete bastardised colony, a mini gehtoo where they live in their own filth. they are aliens and don’t belong anywhere.
your bastard belongs to a new race. i.e you race A, wife race B. child race C!!! he is still capable of racism as long as he is human, so to eliminate racism, why don’t you breed with goats?
racism is not a sin, but the denial of the race that leads to a poisining of the blood is a sin, the eternal sin that cuts us off as living links to our forefathers, it is self-made eternal excommunication. what a sin it is, repentence, regret will never change your bastard back to your race. for this reason I say, the race is the Holy Spirit, and as a sin against the race, which is the Holy Spirit is unforgivable. The resultant excommunication is eternal and just. Think about what you are saying, my dear brother in Christ. May the Holy Spirit which has worked among us lead you into truth. I will pray hard, hard for you, to have the Holy Spirit lead you into understanding of the racial truth.
Role Play!
Sorry, but religious people tend to talk about sex with a controlling and down right negative goal much like…hmmm…shall we say fascists?
Ahhh…has anyone seen my moustache by chance?
Pinnacle,
First, if that’s what you think of tolerance, I should not tolerate your posts anymore.
Second, I can not reproduce with a goat. I can reproduce with a woman; and that is what seems to be natural.
Maybe you will try a goat – if it’s white.
As for going to war for race, such concepts are hopefully passe. I would join a war based on the righteousness of the argument, rather on the basis of chromosomes. For some puzzling reason you think those are the same.
Please stop calling yourself Catholic – what you call Catholicism sounds reeally stupid, and it’s not what we believe.
The Adlarian,
Pinnacle seems to have your moustache.
Xanderman,
In response to Rorty, I think there is such a belief, but it trespasses upon the field of religion.
Pinnacle,
Why not say that people should not interbreed because of respect for the other’s race as well – intending to preserve their uniqueness as well? But you say you will combat based on race, so this more charitable defense of your exclusivity belief seems not to be your position. It is the only defense of exclusivity I can think of that aligns with the Law of loving your neighbor – which is Catholic.