Rationalization

[anew1]

@greenfuse

@anew1

Whereas, I do.

Then why did you say specifically that you are not here to provide us with proof of your claims

Because I left the word out that I usually have included in there.

@greenfuse

Once more, I am not here in philosophy forums to justify my claims and assertions.

I point out that you don’t you prove your claims and you responded by saying that’s not what you are here to do. You also say that the only claims you are here to prove are those claims you’ve made to future generations.

Did I?

@greenfuse

And you are proving that by showing them our responses and commenting on them.

Okay.

@greenfuse

But now you say to FJ that you actually do prove your claims when asked, despite how this contradicts directly what you said earlier.

But it does not contradict at all.

Just believe it does. So, that is all you can see and hear here.

I suggest, once again, you read the actual words I say and write here, from the Mind only, and not from your preexisting beliefs and presumptions.

One day, hopefully soon, you will come to see and understand this suggestion for what it means, exactly.

@greenfuse

You just keep contradicting yourself. Just to make this even more clear:

@greenfuse

@anew1

So, if you ALREADY KNOW that I am not necessarily here to substantiate my claims by providing the irrefutable facts and proof, then why did you write, “they never are”.

I said: meaning: they never are substantiated.

anew1: Of course it meant that.

The very fact that I am not necessarily here to substantiate my claims means

they will not be.

It is good that you present examples of how you only see, and hear, what you want to, and while providing examples of how you do it, exactly.

@greenfuse

They will not be. So, you make it utterly clear that you are not here for that in one post and in another you make it clear will not be substantiated.

Okay.

@greenfuse

But now we are supposed to believe that you do substantiate them. That you will prove them.

Why do you tell “yourself” that you are supposed to do this?

@greenfuse

But now we are supposed to believe that you do substantiate them. That you will prove them.

You keep talking out of both sides of their mouth. Some quotes from anew1:

anew1: Have you SERIOUSLY FORGOTTEN ALREADY that I USE ‘you’, peoples, in the days of when this is being written, to PROVE my CLAIMS are True to ‘future generations’?

Also, I don’t need your compliance for me to use you. You are already doing exactly what I wanted anyway.

I asked him: Are you infallible when it comes to knowing what is True and Real?

Anew1: Yes, and this is just because of the formula I have and the process I use.

Once more, I am not here in philosophy forums to justify my claims and assertions.

I may be a very simple person but seeing and understanding all of ‘life’s’ so called problems, and answers is really rather easy. I can see and understand why every person is the way they are and why they do the things they do.

@greenfuse

All of you here are in a cult, but since none of you even recognise which cult that is, you do not even realise that you are in a cult.

And, how do you know, for sure, that I have not what you call, “found my love” with all people, in all ages, already?

What is called ‘time travel’ is not just possible but can be done very simply and very easily.

Thank you again for repeating what I say and claim. It obviously certainly saves me doing it.