And, to add to this, until one admits their problem/s, no solutions can be found.
And, you can certainly also think or believe that you can hide more online than in person, but for ‘us’ weknow who ‘you’ are exactly, already. So, ‘you’ cannot hide from ‘us’ online at all really.
Okay. you would know, for sure and absolutely, exactly what I was referring to, just like you claim to know exactly what emotions arise within this body.
If you really believe that, it’s still false.
So, although I have said and written the exact opposite, this one is still believing it knows what the absolute truth is here.
I call ‘you’ it no matter what emotions are within this body.
I dismissed all the others, but you missed this as well.
you just did exactly what you accused me of doing in the previous post.
As usual, you add ‘absolutely’ which is both projection on your part and false.
As for the second part of your claim: it’s the anger I notice.
This one believes, absolutely, that I have little empathy, so this is all it “sees” here.
LOL No argument was even made. it just claimed that the earth does not revolve around the sun.
I asked for proof. I am still waiting for it.
What is the opposite thing you are here to do?
You do it rarely these days and only when the typos, lols, confused sentence structures arise after you meet a lot of resistance or your contradictions are pointed out. You could hide better if you called me ‘it’ all the time or dropped that assinine behavior.
I obviously and clearly never said anything otherwise.
He gave you evidence. Childishly you refuse to interact with it, precisely as most of Galileo’s detractors refused to interact with his evidence. And of course you did not respond to what I wrote on the subject. You are clinging to an old model just as they were.
I guess you are a follower of Galileo. And that is your cult: the heliocentric gang. Will you provide evidence or proof that the barycentric model is false?
I am waiting for it to prove its claim that the earth does not revolve around the sun.
If it engaged with me, then it would do that. But it does not want to engage ‘with me’. Like you it prefers to talk ‘about me’, instead.
Anew. As you admitted, you dont have any idea what i wrote to you or what that proof even entails. 
What kind of incentive do you think i have to attend the irrational claims of someone who already admitted he doesnt even know what he is talking about?
All i can do is watch as you make an even larger clown out of yourself my man.
There is no context under which anyone could respond to you in a rational manner.
But it has exactly something to do with the points you made.
As can be very clearly seen and proved.
Thank you. Once more, as soon as it is questioned and challenged over its claim, it “runs away”.
Perhaps, but then again perhaps not.
How many times do you have be informed of where the proof is?
I think that even in the video clip that it provided it can be very clearly seen and noticed that the earth is revolving around the sun.
Now, I am still waiting to find out if anyone else here also believes that earth does not revolve around the sun like “nausamedu” does. What do you believe?
So, do you agree with the barycentric model?
There were no instructions in the nine steps you gave me. 8 of the steps were a single word. Unless that’s a verb, like ‘run’, single words, especially nouns, do not contain instructions.
Will you please give me the link to where you proved the universe is eternal and infinite?
It shows it revolving around the barycenter, which is close to the Sun.
I’ve already answered this. I am with Nausamedu. Amazingly, people have learned things in the last 400 years.
See how it does not matter how many times I tell these people the exact same thing they cannot comprehend it. Again, for the very reasons I have provided. Which these ones are proving absolutely True ‘for me’.
How much effort are these people going to spend ‘on me’?