i’m mostly germanic, but i think the celts had a far more expansive bardic culture. germans are a load of cheeseheads lol
a warrior-centric culture is not as adaptable as a more varied one. germans had their time when destiny was decided by armoured alcoholic psychopaths, then better armour tech but that one to bed.
I respect all pagan beliefs as natural cultural and national expressions of the human psyche communing with nature or the universe around us. I feel no need to distinguish or to say one type is more superior to the other.
A warrior centric culture for me makes sense in that existence is one of conflict and competition.
Survival is one of constant struggle, conflict, and of fight that we indeed could describe existence as a war to survive for all those involved.
That’s true, but its also true that the ancestors differed. It is equally true that if we matched them against todays society, the bardic side of things has come through, whereas the warlike things are whats holding the world back and are not revered and for good reasons.
A human being without tools would not defeat a lion.
Humanity survives only because of technology, if that ended e.g. Through resource depletion, then you would need to be a survivor. But let me say one thing; that would be the ultimate failure of humanity!
Being ‘fit’ means advancing beyond our limits and winning. So instead of war and ‘survival’ in the face of defeat, we need to end all war and do a massive build up of renewable tech/energy ~ and sanitation to india etc. That surely is what winning really is?!!
Of course ancestors differed. In many ways there is a semblance of ancestral worship in contemporary paganism as well.
Germanic paganism is in no shortage of bards or what is referred to as Bragis.
You mistook my statement of war to only mean violent war but like anything else there are many different kinds of wars and battlefields where some are fought on the individual level that we wage against ourselves in the world. Our own personal wars.
War at large I agree with you has become quite dangerous and precarious these days but given the environment of the modern world a more unavoidable thing. Today’s modern warfare has the possibility of threatening all life on the planet til Ragnarokr comes. Whether it is avoidable, inevitable, or fate time will tell. Of course this peace you seem to desire and promote is not without war for even in times of peace a silent more non visual war still lingers on.
I am not against technology however I don’t believe deep within its artificial confines to foolishly believe it is the only thing to save or promote humanity either. Is there a permanent state of winning? I do not think so.
True, but its no where near as expansive as it is in druidic culture. Germanic tribes didn’t even have so much of a religious class, certainly not one which virtually ruled them.
I don’t have difficulty distinguishing between WAR and ‘war’. Usually someone who believes in a warlike culture/religion, believes in WAR.
One can fight that ‘war’ whilst building a permanent [strong] society, and without all the visual harm.
Artificial = tools/utility = human. We can progress to having better tools, or regress to having worse ones. But consider that we have already used up much of the earths resources, and those with easiest access. I don’t think we will get another shot at it, and we’ll end up scratching at the dirt like animals or christians or something.
I think carbons are the solution to longevity and permanence.