Religion and psychiatry

I do not think that the moral and the psychological have ever been to far apart. In fact, the history of mental illness and the power of normality that supports it have often worked with one foot in science and the other in religious-moral institutions.

The archaic notion that homosexuality is a mental illness seems like a historical belief we should let recede into the archives of our medical past. Unfortunately, the conflation of homosexuality and psychiarty still lives on.

Groups like NARTH and the FRC collect pseudo-scientific work that attempts to associate homosexuality and mental illness. One of their favorite concepts to embrace is the effectiveness of reparitive therapy.

First of all, I concede that psychological strategies can be somewhat effective in changing behavior. I do not believe that repartive therapy is completely ineffective, I believe it is a proven tactic in exercising control over a person. I think the extensive use of pychological stress and duress techniques adopted by interrogators world-wide is proof of this. Additionally, the use of drugs to effect behavior is proven.

The problem is that the psychological sciences should be more focused to help people help themselves rather than trying to change behavior according to religious norms. The marriage between medical science and religious institutions is a strange one. It is not unique in history but its revival is disturbing.

Here is a story that we can discuss
http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2003/feat_2003-04-10.cfm

i personally know a lesbian who claims to have been turned lesbain by a particularly abusive dad. i also personally know that she wasnt actually lesbian if the guy was really nice and the opposite of her awful dad.

i also knew a gay guy who always talked in a falsetto. what is the deal with the gay man “accent”? do they just learn how to talk from girls? dont they notice it sounds weird? why do some sound so much more gay than others?

I met a lesbian once and actually had some interesting political discussions with her. I know a few gay guys who I instinctively steer clear of, but you are right FM, they all talk the same in a falsetto voice with the kind of SoCali-girl accent. The way I figure it, the image of SoCali girls represent the closest variable to feminism at its fullest potential. The kind of girls who will have a panic attack if they break a nail…

The speech pattern seems to be the main basis, aside from the selection of clothing, that a gay person epitomizes to sustain a level of self-assurance that “you are gay and you can’t do anything about it, so you might as well imitate the opposite sex the best you can.”