it was automatically closed after 30 days.
i suggested to reduce third world birthrates that we should introduce LGBT to the third world. LGBT is very effective at reducing birth rates and it also has the added benefit of bringing more human rights and egalitarianism into the third world as well.
.
Surely there has to be a better/more noble solution, than turning the third world gay?
You sure you don’t work for the WEF.. 
You’re definitely a Democrat, with those kinds of solutions to problematics on offer.. 
Stay in the democrat vs republican American binary, I have transcended that long ago…
Bringing LGBT is not the same as turning them gay. Many will be trans or bisexual.
Also, I’m sure that if you had a “better” solution you would have shared it with us all already.
.
Your postings here belie that claim.
.
Why aren’t the NGOs doing that.. they swoop in, poke at countries, then leave them for the Northern Hemisphere to deal with and pay for, for decades now.
Seems to be your issue of limited perception. If you think I’m some generic normie Democrat you’re actually clueless…
I don’t know why they aren’t bringing LGBT to the third-world, but that’s what they should be doing and pronto.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.