I hope that didn’t blow that theory out of the water.
Just saying
…
This is a great day.
Child sacrifice and child murder is outlawed. The far-left receive a stunning moral defeat, long overdue. Oh no, Liberals can no longer kill their babies as offerings to Moloch and Baal, oh nooooo!!!
Also Kropotkin is outed as an American traitor, calling for death against Supreme Court Justices. Basically these traitors are Anti-American, domestic terrorists, no surprises here.
its not outlawed. plenty of states have codified it as a right. the life’s work of the evangelical wing of the republican party has resulted in some women having to take a road trip if they want an abortion.
Soon enough it will be illegal nationally, and then Gay marriage can be illegalized and pedo-time story hour… all your perversions and hedonism will be criminalized soon.
Illegalizing child murder obviously upsets you.
i feel like you really don’t understand how the judicial system works in the US. this ruling does not make abortion illegal across the country.
Ah Pedro, I had a feeling it was you, in being Origami… I love you too.
I owe you a reply in the something/nothing Leibniz thread.
Right, that’s more the kind of ruling I would look for. English common law does not constitute American law. Period, for starters. United States common law still makes room for terrorizing as a crime, but no manner of bearing arms by itself can constitute that by simple reason that initself it is already guaranteed as a right.
It’s a common thread in this ruling where they only use the minimum amount of justification required to contradict the respondents in favour of the accusers. I don’t see this as unwise, and it has the great virtue of leaving vast room for future rulings. While it does not endorse a more comprehensive opinion such as that of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in the quoted case, it decidedly does not countermand it. So, in some future ruling, that case can still be made without contradicting the opinion expressed in the current ruling.
The great thing here versus England is derived from a common sensed painfully derived power of appeal and nit necessarily the meaning of ‘appeal’ as predicated by the legal system
If by that you mean the common understanding of hierarchy in law, whereby even valid common law is abrogated, i.e. no longer law, whenever it contradicts a law that is higher up in hierarchy, such as the constitution of the given state, or higher up, the constitution of the United States.
It’s better understood by Roman law, but United States law has proven its virtue is in maintaining conciseness, clarity and continuity where more traditional Roman law requires a constant revising and expanding of written law.
In any case, the justices in this ruling never cross the line of actually making direct appeal to English law. It is only brought up as a tool to clarify the intentions and meanings enshrined in American law.
I still think the needn’t have, but what the hell.
Actually yes and no
Don’t blame me for the pain caused by referring to common sense.
My bad.
It’s the old lawyers trick of “it’s not a car, but even if it were a car, it would not be red, and even if it was red, it would not be polished.”
Nebulose and unarticulated feelings do not common sense make.
It’s funny, reading this, and looking at the vast amount of case law cited, that the bulk of arms bearing and keeping restrictions throughout the history of the United States were put in place to limit specifically newly freed slaves.
Which supports Malcom X’s case that gun control is racist.
_
…but there is the pay-as-you-go pharmaceutical route/option, and no more abortion clinic cash-cows? I bet their share prices will be dropping.
US Bishops welcome Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v Wade
The Bishops of the United States thank God for Friday’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling “which legalized and normalized the taking of innocent human life” through abortion. In a separate statement, the Pontifical Academy for Life urges governments to enact policies that promote life.
Promoting and protecting the most vulnerable
The decision, however, does not make abortion illegal, but merely returns authority to regulate the practice to the American people and their elected representatives.
Defended themselves during riots, did they?
That is a matter of opinion not based on fact.
No, I’m afraid it is fact.
Further, it’s common sense.
There is absolutely a movie here.