Rules: Descriptive, Prescriptive, Purposive

Sparked by a “separation of church and state” discussion with my youngest son and his beloved.

Separation of Church/Religion and State/Science

Science is descriptive - it cannot a) prescribe anything, or b) have a purpose behind it. It’s about the way we actually/evidently are and what we actually/evidently do.

Ethics is prescriptive - it cannot a) describe anything, or b) have a purpose behind it. It’s about the way we should be (and actually/evidently aren’t) and what we should do (and actually/evidently don’t).

Art is purposive - it cannot describe or prescribe anything. It’s about what we want to become, and how we want to behave, whether or not we already are like that or behave that way, and whether or not we should be like that or behave like that.

Prescriptive rules are rules that imperfect people don’t always follow, but should. Legislation that prescribes imperfect behavior or character is no legislation at all.

Descriptive rules describe how we always behave (only a perfect person is ALWAYS described as behaving how they SHOULD behave).

Sometimes we fall back on the way we always behave, but if we don’t always behave that way, it’s because we can choose to behave a different way (which is not necessarily how we SHOULD behave).

Purposive rules (art) neither prescribe nor describe… they aren’t necessarily how we DO behave, nor how we SHOULD behave… they are what we WANT to be/have, what we WANT to do, or WHY we want it… whether or not things are already that way (descriptive science) or should be that way (prescriptive ethics).

If you’re doing ethics, you’re not (just) doing science or art (you are also prescribing a method, which is not itself a description or purpose/why).

If you’re not prescribing, you may still be doing ethics, but you’re not (just) doing ethics (you may also be describing the perfect…describing is science).

And if you are saying “I want this” you’re using a purposive rule, not (just) a description or a prescription. You’re not saying it is or isn’t that way (maybe it is, maybe it isn’t…yet)… you’re not saying it’s good or bad (maybe it is… maybe it isn’t). You’re just saying you want it. For better or worse.

Art (purposing) does more than merely describe or prescribe, and it may do neither. But the highest art does all three, omnipresently—as it is in the highest (immanent transcendence) kingdom.

The Good (prescriptive), the Loved (purposive), and the True (descriptive) are One/Whole (distinct and together).

Talking to myself. If you reply, you will have interrupted an A and A conversation. You can’t C your way out until you B your way in. Or something.

Just like it costs us nothing to give something that can’t be lost (like teaching a language)… (thank you, @Ecmandu)…

The increase of greatness (every moment is evergreen/new) doesn’t mean the previous greatness wasn’t “the fullness” (every moment is eternal/old).

Some kinds of powers/spirits that don’t actually help anybody can run out and hurt people, especially if you use too much.

But the kind of power that God gives (eternal life) never runs out as long as you keep connected with him. The only kind of hurt it causes or allows is the kind of pain a good doctor causes when they reset a broken leg that is healing incorrectly, or a parent allows so their child learns how to make good choices without them.

And everyone is supposed to share it with each other and not keep it all to just one or two or a few people. It’s for everybody!

As long as you keep reconnecting with your co-creator, you will never run out of their power/spirit, and none of your fruit will be forced or fake (or hoarded).

These are the (non-exhaustive) super fruits of co-creative power:

love power begets loving actions and character

joy power begets joyful actions and character

peace power begets peaceful actions and character

patience power begets patient actions and character

kindness power begets kind actions and character

goodness power begets good actions and character

faithfulness power begets faithful actions and character

gentleness power begets gentle actions and character

self-control power begets sober-minded (but not boring) actions and character

They all basically are just different kinds of the same fruit. And against such things there is no law — totally legal fruit. …unless the Freedom from Religion Foundation realizes that science is merely descriptive and that their worldview is basically religious, and they want to abolish every religion & only establish theirs (like some opiate lord marking out their territory). #DiversityAndInclusivity

Imagine a scientist who wants to describe biology without giving any prescriptions about health. Imagine a scientist who wants to describe the interdependent species of a particular climate without giving any emphasis to their respective functions (purposiveness)?

Imagine a scientist who merely describes and never actually does a lot of the things that science actually does. That would be “freedom” from religion. It’s not a good thing.