But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I but the grace of God which was with me. --1 Corinthians 15:10
What is Paul really saying here? Is he giving us permission to accept ourselves with all of our faults? This seems kind of dangerous, doesn’t it? This is one of those versus that seems to me as though it could be easily abused. “Well, I am what I am by the grace of God, so don’t blame me for being a derelict.â€
On the other hand, some of us beat ourselves up constantly. We don’t measure up to certain standards we feel we should measure up to. We’re not where we thought we’d be in life at this point. We’ve suffered failures and lost loves and we blame ourselves and we seriously struggle with confidence and we end up at times feeling a kind of overall contempt for ourselves. And yet are we not manifestations of God as Paul seems to be in some way suggesting?
How is this reconciled? How should this verse be interpreted?
–Jerry
A strictly philosophical (I haven’t read much of the bible) interpretation of and attempted explanation for the above.
So, if the grace of God can be with one of us, as it was with Paul, then can the grace of God not be with one of us?
I think we’re beginning with the assumption that Paul is saying Gods’ grace is with everyone and always. Paul makes the point though that: he yet not he*, “. . .but the grace of God. . . [. . .laboured more abundantly than they all].†The grace of God here seems to be a combination, albeit a capricious one; God could be with anyone and anyone could be with God but the grace of God coming to be only when both choose the other.
Since the grace of God is a combination of God and us it could never be with someone who was derelict.
Since God would now be there to carry part of our burden our part would be lesser. Though this burden be lesser, we cannot abandon it entirely to God for we would then be abandoning Gods’ grace.
Now that we’ve whittled it down we can maybe focus on this question: what is this “lesser burden†which we cannot abandon to God but must suffer onto ourselves? Maybe?
How’s that for a non-Christian interpretation? I’m pretty stoked about it! 
- “. . .I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I. . .â€