Hi, I am almost done with this work; I would like to hear your thoughts;
the beginning says the following;
This is a research project to investigate the theory of proving monism panpsychism from logical tautologies of the empty set, and verifying the ontology with scientific facts.
Historically ontology has been the domain of philosophy, but modern set theory and science may now have enough potency to develop a set-theoretic and scientific ontology; an ontology that is logical necessity, falsifiable, and verified by every correlating physics experiment so far constructed and analyzed. In other words, with the logical tautologies of the empty set, conservation of energy, mass-energy equivalence, zero-point energy, the nature of power, and experiments demonstrating psychic functioning; monism panpsychism is logically proved and empirically verified.
If the universe really is an eternal consciousness (that’s what monism panpsychism implies) then the question is; has the universe in total ever interacted with man? Should we expect it to care about us or interfere with our lives? This has been the claim of many religions. Probable interactions of God with man is presented discussing the global flood, the apparent time frame for the creative ‘days’, Sodom and Gomorrah,…etc All together these demonstrate God’s existence and therefore give weight to the set-theoretic and scientific ontology of monism panpsychism as God’s nature.
The above thesis is a ontonontological falsology of the nontautifiable set. Typical of psychopanentheists to make such claims.
he means nontological
I think there may be some equivocation in your early reasoning:
nothing equals nothing and nothing implies nothing
ergo nothing is not implicated with something
Note; “nothing is not…”, is the contraposition of “everything is…”
ergo everything is implicated with something
It seems like you may be switching between the general and the specific case of the words ‘everything’ and ‘something’, i.e. between ‘everything’ and ‘every thing’, and ‘something’ and ‘some thing’.
I think these are distinct concepts. ‘Everything’ can refer to a single thing (i.e. the Big Everything), or to many things (i.e. all things). ‘Something’ can mean ‘not nothing’ or some specific thing.
So the last sentence could mean “the big everything is implicated with the absence of nothing”, or it could mean something like “For all things X, there exists a thing Y such that X is imiplicated with Y”, or “there exists a thing Y such that the big everything is implicated with Y”, etc. These seem like distinct claims to me.
I may just be misunderstanding the claim: What do you mean by “is implicated with”? How is it different from “is implicated by”? or from “implicates”, or “implies”?
to be involved, connected, or correlated with something
what do you think of the rest of the work?
What do you guys think of;
Deluge Geology, Radio Dating Inaccuracy, and Creative ‘Days’ (theory)
(1) the radioactive decay rate is NOT a constant; neutrino intensity definitely effects the radioactive decay rate.[16]
The higher the neutrino intensity the lower the radioactive decay rate.
(2) atmospheric electrons backscatter neutrinos increasing the intensity of neutrino radiation towards the earth (the atmosphere is a converging lens to neutrinos)
An Earth with a larger atmosphere (such as one that had all the oceanic water as a gas or plasma in a gigantic ionosphere) would increase the intensity of neutrino radiation towards the earth and given fact 1, lower the radioactive decay rate of radioisotopes.
(3) the continental plates fit together completely on a smaller Earth; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnEkFofRFx0
(4) land fossils prove most of the Earth continental plates have been dry land
(5) on a smaller Earth (with all the continental plates put back together) the oceanic water would cover the entire Earth
(6) given fact 4, and 5, it follows that the oceanic water in the past was not on land (rather it must have been in the atmosphere so that it could fall to Earth).
(7) given fact 3, and 6, it follows that the Earth was smaller with a gigantic gaseous or plasma water canopy
(8) given fact 5, and 7, it follows that there was a global flood!!!
(9) but given 2, and 7, it follows that the radioactive decay rate was significantly lower before the flood
(10) given 9, the radio dating methods that assume constants in the radioactive decay rates are absolutely inaccurate (though still having good precision)
(11) the flood must be the last mass extinction event
(12) the K-T iridium aerosols [presumably from meteoroids] and any possible volcanic ash would have acted like cloud condensation nuclei, cloud seeding the deluge
(13) if God saved all the original animals in the Ark then the genera after the flood (notice blue line) matches the genera at Adam’s creation (notice yellow line) proving God saved all the original animals; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phanerozoic_Biodiversity-2.png
(14) If we assume that Adam was 44a when Eve was born and that the creative days are 221Ma (according to the dating inaccuracy) then a creative day is 9,500 years
Eve became the Mother of Seth at 86a. Genesis 5:3 Seth became the father of Enosh at 105. Genesis 5:6 Enosh became the father of Kenan at 90. Genesis 5:9 Cainan became the father of Mahalalel at 70. Genesis 5:12 Mahalalel became the father of Jared at 65. Genesis 5:15 Jared became the father of Enoch at 162. Genesis 5:18 Enoch became the father of Methuselah at 65. Genesis 5:21 Methuselah became the father of Lamech at 187. Genesis 5:25 Lamech became the father of Noah at 182. Genesis 5:28 The Flood started when Noah was 600. Genesis 7:6
(86+105+90+70+65+162+65+187+182+600)=1612a of creative day seven [Eve’s creation to the flood]
1612a*221/37.5=9500 [this is a creative day]
Fifth day
510 Ma the first fish, the jawless ostracoderms.
410 Ma the first fish with jaws, the acanthodians.
365 Ma the tetrapods.
350 Ma the dragonfly (the first flying creatures were insects).
340 Ma the amniotes.
And God went on to say: Let the waters swarm forth a swarm of living souls and let flying creatures fly over the earth upon the face of the expanse of the heavens. And God proceeded to create the great monsters and every living soul that moves about, which the waters swarmed forth according to their kinds, and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good. … And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a fifth day. (Genesis 1:20-23)
Surprisingly enough, the flying creatures in this verse is not birds (as many may have thought), rather, it is insects!
Sixth day
285 Ma the therapsids.
230 Ma the dinosaurs.
225 Ma the first true mammals, Gondwanadon tapani or Morganucodon watsoni.
150 Ma the first bird, Archaeopteryx.
And God went on to say: Let the earth put forth living souls according to their kinds, domestic animal and moving animal and wild beast of the earth according to its kind. And it came to be so. And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good. (Genesis 1:24, 25)
As you can see this work clarified our understanding of the bible (first flying creatures are insects) and the creation of the other animals matches the day of their biblical creation
(15) since the creation of Eve to the present it’s been about 6000a
(16) Tyranusourus Rex fossils are dated between the creation of Eve and the date of the Flood; somewhere around 800a of creative day seven or ~5,200 years ago (inaccurately dated to 80Ma)
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/10/17/62/2161798/6/1200x0.jpg
How old is this T. Rex blood and soft tissue? 5,200 years old or 80 MILLION years old?
I predict that the soft tissue found in T. Rex bone will Carbon 14 date to around 5,200 years old!
This will verify my theory about the Deluge Geology, Radio Dating Inaccuracy, and Creative ‘Days’.
That said, how could man, birds, and land animals have survived the deluge?
According to the bible (and over a hundred of other ancient sources), there was a great flood that destroyed the ancient world, for which, the gods spared some men and animals.
Jehovah claimed to cause the flood. In any cause we must grant at least the existence of advanced extraterrestrials (or gods exist or even that God exists) such that they could have spared some men, otherwise, mankind and all the animals on land could not have possibly survived such an event.
Ron Wyatt found a formation in the mountains of Ararat of petrified wood in the shape of a boat having the same length as described of the Ark in the Bible; https://i.pinimg.com/originals/55/8a/cb/558acb1d59f1dab953c3fcaa16cc2670.jpg
Discussion;
Birds are not spoken of in the creative days as flying creatures because the first birds originally did not strictly fly about; “Gliding, not strong flight: Fossil evidence suggests that Archaeopteryx and other early birds had weaker feathers and skeletal structures that were not strong enough for sustained, powered flight, but were likely capable of gliding between trees or other high points. Flight developed later: Powered flight developed over time, with some ancient birds evolving the flight-friendly feather structures of modern birds later in the Cretaceous period.”-Google AI
The Ark found by Ron Wyatt is located at the base of the mountains of Ararat, not “on” them (as is otherwise so translated). But no worries, the word translated “on” can actually be translated as “among, at, or touching”.
The Flood and Noah’s Ark are intended to be a Fable, not literally true or historical. The story so early in Genesis separates “true believers” from those (Autists) who cannot distinguish between reality and fiction. The Flood is metaphorical, not literal, as are most aspects of Genesis.
Nope. The folks in the bible who wrote the flood bit actually thought a giant flood had happened. They weren’t creating metaphors. Likely, the idea was gotten from Sumerian memes. Really the content of the bible is a mash-up of the various mythologies of the region. You get a little zoroastrianism, a little astrology, a little paganism, etc.
Think of the middle east’s religious development as a long running Harry Potter series. Each book builds from the last in the series.
Those who wrote The Bible were keenly aware of The Big Lie and how to rule over the masses / slaves.
So I disagree. The Wise-men were always Philosophers / Doubtful, and most importantly Rational. Rabbinical Jews, today, have their own set of rules / myths / ethics called the Talmud. So… you’re wrong.
it does seem more plausible than continents shifting around like eggs on a frying pan. But i need more evidence than a blurry 240p video
I agree, and with length contraction due to concentration of neutrino radiation comparing before and after a flood; it provides a physical mechanism for the expansion of the earth and the break up of the continental plates;
neutrinos warp spacetime inducing gravity
I have a hunch that for sure electrons (but possibly all matter) gradients backscatter neutrinos into gradients which (increase the vacuum refractive index and) warp spacetime
The atmosphere and the lithosphere are converging lenses to radiation including neutrinos
I predict that neutrinos induce something similar to the AC Kerr effect [the higher the intensity, the higher vacuum refractive index induced].
If this is true, then the vacuum refractive index is a transcendent function of neutrino radiation intensity.
In other words, the vacuum refractive index necessarily changes according to altitude.
Light travels slower in higher refractive index i.e. TIME DILATION according to altitude!
FYI, if material bodies (and their radiations and atmospheres) are a converging radiation Luneberg lens, the vacuum refractive index becomes itself stratified as a converging Luneberg lens!; i.e. curvature of light in outer space around objects such as the Sun, solar system, galaxy, galaxy clusters etc.
We will need to express the structure of matter; and to expand on Randel’s orbitosphere in terms of electromagnetism, I claim the orbitosphere is [similar to] a Kerr-induced self-focusing refraction curvature. One of the results being that as the vacuum refractive index increases, the Bohr radius shrinks [metaphor; imagine an electron orbiting an atom at a particular velocity and orbital frequency, if you slow the velocity (by increasing the refractive index) the orbit length would have to shrink to maintain the same orbital frequency] i.e. LENGTH CONTRACTION according to altitude (i.e. according to N radiation intensity).
https://brilliantlightpower.com/book-download-and-streaming/
as mass travels into higher vacuum refractive index, the mass of matter shrinks, but energy is conserved so the mass energy transforms into kinetic energy; in other words, there is gravity
http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/gravity/index.html
light curves into higher refractive index
I predict that neutrinos induce vacuum refractive gradation.
Therefore; neutrino gradients curve light.
and by the way; matter is merely; [similar to a Kerr-induced] self-focusing refraction curvature OF LIGHT
If matter is a self-focusing refraction curvature of light, then it is light… circulating in a stabilized vortex.
In relation to the flood proof, and the expanded earth geology; the earth is expanded due to the fact that the core of the earth has a lower neutrino intensity due to the fact that there is less neutrinos converging into the earth because the atmosphere is smaller, as all the water of the preflood earth is in the oceans; in other words, the matter of the core of the earth is length expanded in comparison to the preflood core. This expansion cracked the surface crust creating the continental plates.
The-age-of-the-oceanic-crust.png (1032×530)
this show the relative dating of the expansion of the earth
1 Like
“Those who wrote The Bible were keenly aware of The Big Lie and how to rule over the masses / slaves”
Those who published the Bible knew it was all lies, not those that wrote the texts that compose the Bible. Those guys were genuinely stoopid and believed it all.
That’s like saying Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, “were genuinely stoopid and believed it all”, when he invented Mass Media, Commercialism, Propaganda, Hollywood, Public Relations… all the media we watch, the movies, the news… he was the one who got women in America smoking cigarettes.
But it is interesting the lengths your instincts go to protect your Tribe, Prom.