Sex and Control

Avians are above Mammals on the food chain?!? Tell that to chickens…

Let me clarify… Jews deify Jewish women. Jews are allowed to denigrate women of other races / religions, but even they have restraint in that. Epstein and Weinstein enjoyed raping and demeaning white women, who they do not see of their same race.

Yes… Males are supposed to be Protectors. If a father, brother, or son cannot protect a family, then the women SURELY cannot!

Learn this term Trixie: Sexual Dimorphism.

Mammalian males are protectors of their women/gene-pools, mostly against other competing males.

Chickens are failed avians that can’t fly.

Raptors, eagles, all national symbolism, nations symbolize higher lifeforms.

Top of the food chain - Z coordinate larger than other Z coordinates

Higher life forms - Higher in altitude.

Chozo.

Avians have no natural predator since they can just fly away from anyone.

Flying is a form of masculinity. Quagmire. Pilots. Superman. Rockets in space.

i already know what sexual dimorphism is, all this stuff is not new to me.

its all very primitive ooga booga stuff, some ogres pillaging villages and the men in the villages defending their women from rape by ogres. Its all very old testament and tribalism. I learned about old testament, semites and savages in grade school

you should embrace bonobos more. Ask sculptor to learn more about that.

now if you look into malls and how malls collapsed, there are several reasons. The history of a mall is that it was created by a jew who wanted to create social gatherings for people. atheists have no social gatherings but im not sure if they were an atheist or not. a lot of stores in malls are overpriced capitalism so there are not great deals in there. you say it is because of black thugs.

on the topic of black thugs, it is what ecmandu says about hypergamy and women dragging down the human race. My vision for the black race is young sheldons and steve urkels who are blacks. But it is a meme that those types don’t get laid. Women seek out black thugs which causes black men to emulate black thug behavoir and style. This drags down the whole human race and why humanity cannot evolve. Women want to promote the ooga booga lifestyle and they do it subconsciously, its all very insidious

if you ask me “do i believe hypergamy increases the odds of high iq’s reproducing”? my guess is no. again with the ecmandu. he believes he is older spiritually by these women and views it as statutory rape, even if he is physically the same age. Look at the difference in brain volume, and how wokes always will deny the importance of brain volume. And people tell Ecmandu to wait for his soulmate wife. I have found some women IRL who were almost as high IQ as me, but they weren’t interested in me sexually, physically. Even though i was tall. Blackpillers always say “just be tall” but its really not that easy. They just want someone to be jealous of and they pick tall people for that. Now if a woman is high IQ that means they are big brained, some women can have as much as 1400cc brains, when the male average is 1350 cc. But what does big brained mean it means they are also more discriminatory, larger visual cortex, less likely to be sexually attracted. Which goes back to the Ecmandu thing about, finding bimbos who aren’t intelligent, but that you cannot connect with as a person. Hence why i believe hypergamy doesn’t result in high iq’s breeding.

Males have reached peak mediocrity, which is to say a state of total complacency.

Males are not so ugly as to be true ogres to be called true ogres, and hence there is no driving force to push towards escape velocity. When they look in the mirror there is no sharp ugliness to propel them to change the status quo. And yet when they look in the mirror, they are not struck by beauty, there is nothing there. This I call the phenomenon of the “male blob”, peak mediocrity.

So you proved my point here. Mammals built rockets into space, not Avians.

It’s not “primitive” though. Weren’t you commenting against Satyr and Feminization of Man, this recent week? Aren’t you offering your “Futanari Plan” or whatever? Aren’t you LGBTQ+ and pro-tranny? It’s the opposite of “primitive”. It’s more important than ever before.

Heterosexuality is what keeps a society healthy and prosperous, NOTHING ELSE DOES.

We can boil it down to one very politically incorrect reason though.

Good luck with that. Who are the highest-IQ blacks in your opinion? What do Thomas Sowell and Candace Owens tend to say about things??? Do they espouse far-leftist, liberal, Marxist values???

Monogamy and Aristocracy are the sexual routes that lead to higher IQs, historically. Jews are Theocratic, entirely dependent on their religious identity (as Jewish), so that’s another route. Low IQs are impulsive and desperate, (the males are) “lucky” to get sex and reproduce. The low-IQs will do anything for sex, especially debase and degenerate themselves. There is no low they won’t bottom out to. This applies to low-IQ females too (OnlyFans).

I have to argue the point against Bob next… yes, “Masculinity” has degenerated throughout the West since the 1950s. There are many reasons and causes for it. The main one is, an Abundant and wealthy society, leads to degeneration and decay. It’s easy to be lazy when you’re wealthy. It’s difficult to maintain Discipline and high standards.

This is why “Old Money” looks down upon “New Money”. New money loses it 90% of the time. They’re not inter-generational. They’re only temporarily rich.

Chimps are ooga-booga primitive, Bonobos are advanced, and LGBT…

Bonobos were kicked out of chimp society and formed their own society. Just like how Africans were kicked out of Africa thousands of years ago, and became Caucasians, forming their own society. Africa continues to be anti-LGBT and ooga-booga, while Europeans are pro-LGBT.

Futarani is HETEROSEXUAL though. They are males impregnating females (well most will be bisexual probably, but still.)

Also in ancient societies there was a lot of homosexuality, especially in Ancient Greece. Rome even had a trans emperor, and ancient society was full of eunuch politicians and beaurocrats. Modern society has 0 eunuch politicians, which should show you that anti-LGBT is nothing more than a remnant of a Western Abrahamic upbringing. In Shakespeare era it was normal for men to dress in drag in plays. Anti-LGBT is an artifact of Abrahamism and modernity.

When I asked AI about historical and current trends in voting, as well as the differences between male and female voters, I received the following reply:

"Historically and currently, women are more likely to be represented in, and active within, left-leaning or progressive political parties. However, this pattern is not absolute. Recent developments demonstrate that right-wing parties can also garner substantial female support, particularly when addressing issues such as family welfare. Nevertheless, structural and perceptual barriers still limit women’s political representation and influence, regardless of political alignment.

Women’s voting patterns are more closely linked to practical and material concerns. Research shows that increases in female labour force participation lead women to support parties that advocate welfare policies, economic redistribution and public sector spending — issues that directly affect daily life and economic security.

Men, on the other hand, are more likely to be attracted to ideological or radical positions. Studies indicate that far-right or radical-right parties often find more support among men, especially young men, while women are less likely to be drawn to these movements. This suggests a gendered difference in the appeal of ideological extremes.

Women’s political choices are often shaped by practical, day-to-day concerns and material interests, especially with regard to welfare and equality. In contrast, men are somewhat more likely to gravitate towards ideological or radical positions. However, these are broad trends with many individual exceptions, and both men and women can be motivated by a mix of practical needs and ideological beliefs depending on the context."

This aligns strongly with my own experience and also explains why female officials are subject to gendered harassment such as threats of violence, sexual intimidation and targeted online abuse. This not only endangers their personal safety but makes it harder for them to perform their duties and discourages continued participation – the goal of insecure men like you.

The primitive ideal of sexual liberation has been tied to American freedom, tied to the West in general to sell a product, to sell nationality, to bolster the Military Industrial Complex.

Sexuality is exaggerated to keep the idea of freedom alive. It promotes the notion that military systems, nationalistic governments, liberate the people. It’s profitable for the Military Industrial Complex. It’s beneficial for nation states. It suggests liberty while promoting a power structure supporting certain interests. It suggests a level of freedom when everything else has an obvious monetary price. The troops must fight for something, and it isn’t lower insurance rates.

The West differentiates itself from the East, particularly the Middle East, by certain notions of freedom or liberty. The West tries to set itself apart through that notion of freedom. Anyone going against that notion of freedom, anyone denigrating mindless promiscuity which has been sold as a feature of freedom in the West is viewed almost as a traitor or an enemy. It is a major political and social issue in America. A sign of the degeneracy of the society. Mindless, primitive carnality valued over principle.

Now that’s a theory I haven’t heard before.

In the Middle East they are hypersexual as well, terrorists believe in 17 virgins. Non-terrorists aspire to be rich and find oil for heterosexual harems and such. In Afghanistan they force young boys to crossdress for pedos.

The practice your AI referred to is known as bacha bazi in Afghanistan. This is a form of child sexual exploitation in which boys, often from poor or vulnerable backgrounds, are forced to dress in women’s clothing and dance at parties for adult men , after which they are frequently subjected to sexual abuse123457. The perpetrators are usually powerful men, including police, military officials, and local leaders4568.

Now I believe there is some truth to what you say though, because in America they like to tease and sexually frustrate males with women dressing sexually and wearing makeup. In the middle east they have the decency to acknowledge that sexually frustrating males is not a nice thing to do, and that women shouldn’t dress in such a way as to arouse males in public like that.

America and the West are oversexed, not sexually suppressed as the original post suggests.

Sexuality is prevalent in American film, music and society in general. It’s practically unavoidable.

The American branch of the Military Industrial Complex happily endorses sexual liberation:

PRIDE IN THE ARMY Commander talks career, life during LGBT Pride Month event

U.S. Military Holds LGBT Pride Event In Kandahar, Afghanistan

Defense Department Hosts LGBT Pride Month Event

Abortion rates actually increased after overturning Roe vs. Wade:

American STD rates are skyrocketing:

“Washington, D.C. — Today, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released its 2021 STD Surveillance Data showing that sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have reached a new record high for an eighth year in a row.”

https://www.statista.com/chart/19597/total-reported-std-cases-in-the-us/

Not only is the West excessively sexual, it is irresponsibly so.

If these organizations seek to control sexuality they are doing a terrible job.

There is too much money to be made from sexuality. Sex sells. For the profit-minded, which is capitalist Western society, controlling or curtailing sexuality would mean bankruptcy.

I feel it’s historical revisionism to comb through history and accuse European greatness and leaders of “oh he’s a fag”, “oh he’s gay”, “oh he’s a jew”, just a bunch of nonsense. First most of these accusations are from gays and jews who are projecting themselves. Second there’s little evidence for it. Third, since Antiquity, sexual degeneracy was always seen as a weakness, fault, and sin.

Sex is only pure when it’s procreative, between man and woman, for giving birth. It’s common sense, perverted by those who cannot achieve it themselves.

Women voting has been a disaster.

Anybody who cannot or will not fight on the frontline in a war, should not be allowed to vote.

True, which is why the American battle between Liberals and Conservatives is quintessential to the future of the nation.

America in the 1960s was suppressed. Then the Hippy counter-culture cropped up, fueled by Marxists and the Frankfurt School. Then that loosened sexual approach took over television, media, and movies through Hollywood, into Pornography. All of these led to the current “oversexed” state, which I never denied.

Pornography was the ‘Capitalizing’, monetizing of Sex, making it into various forms of prostitution. Only Fans is the current outcrop of this, where young attractive girls are lured to selling nudes online rather than any minimum wage job today. It is morally destructive, and a huge segment of the general civilizational decline. It represents a lack of Discipline, self-control, and general morality/ethics.

The Military-Industry has little to do with American sexuality. I don’t know where you got this idea.

The Military-Industrial complex primarily focuses on military Arms sales, foreign wars, and syphoning American taxpayer money into Military Intel black ops.

Marxists are the ones who drove American sexuality into the gutter; much of them hate “white people” and prefer the white race were destroyed in general (hence American Leftists).

American sexuality has lots to do with the Military Industrial Complex.

It’s used as a selling point for military. Review the links above.

Military can’t claim lower grocery prices. Military can’t claim lower insurance rates. Military can’t claim lower monthly car payments. But military can claim sexual liberty. And it literally clings to that flag with its dying breath.

Military is business. With no real product. Military provides no real tangible benefit. So military must sell ideas and notions, oftentimes empty ideas and notions. Sexual liberty is one of those.

The more support military garners, regardless the avenue, the greater opportunity for additional funding and further empowerment. Like any other business selling a product and expanding itself.

You’re claiming Western institutions serve to control sexuality. From evidence presented along with everyday observation one would infer the opposite.

Sexual Desecration:

Recently in the Postmodern America, Pornography has thoroughly degraded the average American male… and really males around the world since American Pornography was exported all over the global internet. Obviously Jews own and control most of the American Pornography industry, as a primary outcrop of the Marxist takeover of American Education, Colleges, and Institutions in the 1960s onward. This sexual degeneracy is now rampant.

I want to talk about the act of Sexual Desecration. This is a “natural” act in such that it is not limited to contemporary time or internet pornography, but rather exponentially exposed, available, and on display in a way never seen before. In bygone centuries, and in the Ancient times, rampaging barbarian tribes and hostile takeovers were brutal, women were taken as sex-slaves and slaves in general. But today the act of sexual desecration is more ‘abstract’ and visual. It’s in everybody’s faces. It’s a few clicks away (or less) on anybody’s smart phones.

The act of sexually dominating a young woman (or boy) demonstrates to the rest of the world that “this girl is mine”. It represents smearing one’s body fluids over the face and body of the “victim”. Meanwhile “Feminism” has very little to say or do about Pornography, as long as women ‘profit’ from the exchanges, as long as it’s “voluntary”. But how can it be “voluntary” to degrade oneself so lowly, for money? This is supposed to be yet another ‘benefit’ of Capitalism. This doesn’t mean that I side with the Marxists who spawned it. They are no ally, in my opinion.

In essence, this sexual demoralization is a result of Americanism / Globalism. It destroys the weak-spirited females of societies and lures them into the sexual underbelly of immorality and all other degenerate morals. Really it is the Criminal element of society, that depends upon the disciplined sexual morality of Conservatives, to provide an abundant supply of innocent, naive, virgin, and chaste young girls to be consumed by their auspices and industries. I consider these sexual degenerates as “Leftists” since they cannot either produce sexual innocence of their own accord, nor can they defend it. Because they have no institutional morality, unlike the political and religious Right.

On this point, it is where I break with supposed Western “Pagans” as well. It is only in the dominant Abrahamic Faiths: Christianity (Catholicism), Judaism (Protestantism), Islam, that even remotely offers sexual chastity and protection …but at a steep cost as well. On the Right, you must offer yourself and your loyalty to “God” in order to maintain sexual innocence, protection, and prosperity. On the Left, you must economically buy in, and even then that isn’t really enough to avoid or ignore it.

Sexual Desecration is the act of targeting young, sexless, adolescent girls (and sometimes boys, targeted by queers, homosexuals, and pedophiles) as a means of ‘Conquest’. It’s about taking, stealing, and destroying “Innocence”. It’s not really about Pregnancy and insemination, since these are usually not correlative to it. Rather it’s about destroying a young person’s capability to maintain innocence, which usually leads to a strong family foundation through religious Marriage. Because Marriages are premised under Chastity.

When it comes time to reproduce, it is clear universally that chase women are the highest value, target, and prize… not prostitutes, and not female “victim” leftovers. No man wants to settle with a woman who’s been used up by the rest of the neighborhood or town. To do show, “virtue signals” how much of a cuckold one is “as a man” and has no self-respect or dignity.

I’m sure that many incels think that way. At least they could get their own back!

I’ve had more sex than you’ve ever had, Bobby boy, that much is obvious.

Any other Ad Homs, or are you finished for now…?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The next thing you’ll be doing is demanding that every male send dick-picks. What a waste!

Brilliant retort… so you’re done then?

Maybe the next person will respond to the points…

My point stands: Any “Democracy” should revolve around military capability and risk first and foremost.

Democracy does need a credible defence, from both threats from outside and within, as we have recently seen, but it should be loyal to the constitution and controlled by checks and balances.

But you would say that over half of the population has no voice in issues that affect them, that they should be quiet and let men do what they have for millennia, make a pig’s dinner of it all. You think with your genitals and not with your brain.