Faith is trusting your reasons despite your changing moods. Until you get that, you’ll only be capable of the sort of love that is from a lack, rather than from fullness.
i think its because atheists have moral relativism, therefore females feel no obligation to stop hypergamy. But im not sure. Its probably more complicated than that. But it seems to disprove the beta-alpha heirarchy theory. Religious males are literally called slaves of god (that is where the term Slav comes from), while atheists are more masculine and free-spirits.
still not as cucky as wolves where only the alpha male and alpha female reproduce, lions are a close second in cuckyness.
because saying the sun is a plasma mind is the pinnacle of reason.
1 Like
sounds like those men are elite troops.
women can still be useful as frontlines, berserkers, cannon fodder, or a diversion etc. Or as guards, snipers, vehicle drivers, etc. they dont need skills or physical strength of elite agents.
wrong
15 charac
…why not just be glad you’re human and be more selective with your mate?
Let it be known that it is still cuckolding when a man goes and sleeps with a whole bunch of other women besides his mate, whether or not he gets them knocked up. …unless they are in some sort of bi-/polygamous relationship and there’s still faithfulness there because they don’t go outside the relationship (to bring in new additions) without the consent of all existing partners. But that is multiplying chaos, isn’t it? But if it’s chaos you want to avoid, it is better to have zero mates and just stand still in one place your entire life.
The Sun is a mind in the form of plasma. It is collective and operates at a level higher than biology. But the pinnacle is the mind of the Universe — the totality of all possible forms of intelligence, unified at the level of thought (movement and connections) of elementary particles.
Kind of, in the human right-wing (Christ Cuckoldry), all males are subservient to God as a Meme. Therefore only God’s Seed, God’s Spirit is “allowed” to reproduce. Left-wingers don’t have morals or ethics against hypergamy, polyamory, general sexual debauchery, incest, etc. So it’s very complicated.
Not really, you seem unable or unwilling to recognize and admit general physical differences between the male and female species. Males, in general, are much stronger, much more capable of violence, than females. Hence why a female in military service, on the front line, is far less capable.
Female soldiers in Ukraine have not stopped or repelled the Russian advance.
Female soldiers in the IDF have not stopped Hamas or Iran’s bombardments.
Females in warfare is a stupid idea anyway, imo. I suspect it’s an entirely ‘Jewish’ ideal anyway. It makes no sense whatsoever. It comes from the false ideal of “Gender Equality” or that the two genders are equally capable. Pro-tip: they’re clearly not…
Deborah and Jael were necessary & successful because the men dropped the ball.
History repeats because men are slow learners.
Of course that applies to both genders.
Yes I got ensnared in a debate with one of these Moral Relativists. Adamantly and rudely arguing to me about how Moral Relativism is the only scientific opinion and everything else is a delusion.
99.9% of these moral relativists are not really moral relativists themselves, but will argue adamantly that moral relativism is the only form of rationality. 99.9% are moral people in one way or the other but pretend like moral relativism is a valid thing. I guarantee 99.9% of these moral relativists will post on 1 platform how immoral that rape is, then 1 minute later on another platform will go on some online rant about how moral relativism is the only rational and scientific opinion.
You need to keep up with me. I realized long ago that females are physically weaker and males. It is obvious by watching common sports.
Wasting all your best troops at the beginning of a battle is a questionable tactic but it depends on the battle conditions. But in any battle it can increase the odds of victory to spam cannon fodder at the enemy if only as a diversion. Especially if they use unusual proprietary ammo that can’t be used by the enemy, paired with subpar weaponry
I believe we’re in an entirely different realm as far as Postmodern warfare goes. Ukraine and Israel prove it. Drones and robots, war machines are coming next, and fast and soon. It’s ridiculous to me, to send females into warfare to die. Females are vastly more valuable to a society than average males. That’s a common Hominid / Mammalian fact, so I don’t know why you’re against it…?
Not your shining hour.
Females more valuable to a society than males? Are you kidding me? Who is it that always works the tough jobs, construction, mines, who are the CEOs, are the ones innovating computers and robotics…?? Who do you call to repair anything??
And the world is overpopulated with 8 billion… baby makers are the most valuable in olden times with tiny towns… that is why they evolved to not be warriors… because the vast majority of evolution occurred in tiny villages…
You’re ignoring the womb and baby-making.
No women = No society.
A society can easily survive with 1/10th the male population, since males can repopulate quickly. A society devoid of females cannot.
Not YOUR shining hour, now.
artificial wombs
1 Like
I literally just said we have 8 billion people and its not like every woman is going to join the military and be in frontlines, is it?
Really it’s only Jews who really want to put women on the frontline in wars, as they do with the IDF female soldiers, and they do now in their Jewish outpost of Ukraine. I believe it has something to do with extreme Gender Equality as an outcrop of Human Equality. It is the leftwing-secular (per)version of their religious beliefs.
You identify with 8 billion “Humans”, but that’s not how 99.9% of humanity identify themselves. People identify themselves as their biological family first, their extended family, their tribe, their clan, their city, their state, their nation. Humanity is the largest abstraction, and so most meaningless. You are running into the realm of: “Race is a social construct”.
It’s obviously not… agreed?
1 Like
I do not believe gender equality exists genetically in the current time period. There may have been closer to gender equality in long ago time periods such as Cromagnon man and Cromagnon woman some of them having 1550 cc brain volume compared to Cromagnon man’s 1600 cc. (However, Cromagnon data is scarce. It is possible 1550 cc was not the norm for Cromagnon women.) Nowadays the gender gap is larger with women at average 1220 and men at 1350. Granted it fluctuates because the ranges are men: 1050-1500 and women: 975-1400. That is how you get the public perception that some women are smarter than men, because they are. And they ignore and gloss over all the ones that are dumber, since they are uninteresting and blend into the background and do not even register into their observation.
If you look into Jewish and Semite culture they very much do not believe in gender equality if you read the old testament you will see women are mostly background and secondary to men. I also heard that Israel is at risk of a theocracy.
As I said before I believe there are valid and strategic reasons of having female troops and this is not because I believe in genetic gender equality. You actually may want to reserve your best and more capable troops for later on. Second there is a social “morality” that believes men must be forced to be soldiers and die as cannonfodder on a battlefield, that this is all that men deserve. I flip that morality around and say why not women? Why are not women forced to be soldiers like everyone else? Its bad enough they make the world miserable with hypergamy, yet then are rewarded while men are punished some more.
So in terms of the 8 billion and then you are saying well that’s not really the size of a society. So a society is less than 1 billion I would say. Could it really stand strong with only 10% of men, no probably not. It would have no military or infrastructure strength and could quickly be conquered by other nations (if they wanted to.) Who would you call to repair anything? Who would be building all the engineering? Who would be the CEOs and ordering the microchips? That is one big reason I wish for my Futarani and transsexualizations to be worldwide, especially the transsexualizations in the third-world, rather than having it only in the first world. There is no guarantee the Futarani will have an exceptional combat performance, but with some enhancements, they might. Transsexuals certainly wouldn’t because they are on estrogen, Futarani are different and have higher levels of testosterone.
Ah… so human and gender equality existed, but in the distant past like 10,000 or 100,000 years ago?? The Mammalian specie proves you wrong though. Mammalian species the males are larger and stronger than females. I believe it is Avians and Insects where the females are larger and stronger than males. Very low on the “food chain”, very low in Natural Hierarchy.
So your desire for gender and human equality, is not found in Nature. Because the very reason for gender disparity, is disparity of specialized roles: male and female, Heterosexuality. We evolved OUT OF your presumed “Equality”, into greater survival and existence. Nature then, demands and desires Inequality. Inequality means higher survivability rates.
Semites, Jews in particular, venerate, idolize, and deify Women because during their early slave origins, they could not count on their biological fathers for security, care, and safety. They depended on their mothers, and over-corrected. American Negroes are the same and demonstrate much of the same cultural and societal compulsions: Matriarchal. Black fathers only reproduced at the behest and permission of their Owners, White Masters. Many Negro slaves were castrated, circumcised, or simply not allowed to reproduce.
You missed my point.
Most people identify their “Society” with their own family first. People don’t want their mothers, sisters, daughters dieing in a war. Males are the natural protectors of females. This is a Mammalian instinct. Male lions are the protectors of their territory and females. Male wolves are the protectors of their territory and females. These are pack-animals. Bovine and Equine, even in the herd-animals, males protect their territory and females… from other males, from intruders, from invaders, from “immigrants”, etc.
Exaggerations, polemics…
I said they approached parity, not that parity was ever achieved…
Avians are top of the food chain…
My desire is for females to be the front-lines. Whether or not these females are equals to males in combat, does not matter to me.
Is that why Jews are known for sexist comedy routines like Seinfeld and others? Why Weinstein was a rapist and Epstein coerced girls into prostitution? Because Jews venerate and deify women? Is that why Bill Cosby was a rapist? Is that why Black rap music and is the most misogynist music in the world?
Is that why whites get on their knees for marriage and open doors for ladies? Why white men beg to be first to drown on sinking ships?
Is that why the Old Testament is the most misogynist book in the world? Is that why Jesus’ twelve disciples were all male?
But brothers, fathers, all sent to war, all perfectly fine and accepted by these people?