I wish there was an easy answer to your reply, there isn’t one. Teenage girls are a lot harder to parent than boys, that’s for sure.
As my eldest my daughter is certainly the most rebellious and defiant of the six.
At this point any mistakes she makes I hope she learns from them overtime because telling her what to do is futile at best.
That was just about not divorcing. And if you could say it was about keeping it monogamous, then the fact that two people get married (say they are a second marriage in a bigamous or polygamous relationship) is not automatically a sign that God has brought them together, is it (so this would apply to a first marriage)? Just something to keep in mind. Paul does counsel—not command—not to divorce a non-believer and not to become unevenly yoked with (marry) one. It seems he and Moses were very generous with the wiggle room. Almost like they knew they were fighting an uphill battle… in the snow… barefoot… unarmed… even while possessing entire armories..
Read through it, had a good laugh. So—what is it you actually want to know?
Most likely—nothing, as usual. And that’s easy to prove.
What is sex?
It’s the satisfaction of a biological instinct—achieved through a partner (or multiple). That’s it.
How is an instinct controlled?
By another, stronger instinct—fear.
And from there we arrive at the true definition of power:
Power is a system of prohibitions, followed by indulgences—temporary permissions granted by whoever made the rules in the first place. That’s all. Nothing more to say. No need for endless “opinions” or intellectual fluff.
Sex? Defined.
If you’re curious about how power operates by inducing fear to control sexuality—then name the topic honestly:
“Power and Sex.”
But if you go that route, then be specific:
Who holds the power? How is it used to manage sexual behavior?
Enough nonsense about “perversions.”
Perversions are not spontaneous, nor are they inherited—they are implanted, cultivated by a global system of power whose interest lies in population reduction. Not “morality,” not “decadence.” Just policy.
If you’re being conditioned into sexual confusion, it’s not by accident. You’re being trained—your desires shaped by systems that benefit from your disorientation.
Female dominance?
If the male is weak, then naturally, the female takes control. What’s there to debate?
Do you want to justify male weakness?
Or are you wondering why girls are raised to “sell themselves” for the highest price? Instinct again: reproduction requires resources. So of course they choose based on “the wallet.”
Is that confusing?
Need a rational explanation for instinctive behavior? That’s what psychology is for—error, contradiction, the irrational. That’s the only domain where going against nature even makes sense.
But is that what you’re really after?
No. You’re not here for knowledge. Not in the slightest.
“Left” vs. “Right”?
All that political garbage is downstream from what’s already been said. Different slogans—same sexual politics. Wherever there’s power, there will be perversions.
If you lack your own power, perversion will be used against you.
So again—what’s the point of this topic?
…this “results” in an infinite regress.
First, you have to start out with the way things are supposed to be. Before they went wobbly.
If there is no way they’re supposed to be, then there is no such thing as perversion.
“Self equals other” is your starting point (your break-even, if you will). Outdoing each other in love (which casts out fear) is the only proper form of chrematistics.
“Norma”: The Continuation of the Species 
Everything else is just a consequence.
Here’s a piece of insight you won’t find in school textbooks or trending YouTube lectures 
:
Birth defects and degeneration are the natural result of close inbreeding.
From the perspective of raw instinct, sexual attraction within a family (incest) may not seem “unnatural.” But from the perspective of species survival, it’s a dead end. 
In animal breeding, scientists test the vitality of a bloodline by deliberately pairing close relatives. If the offspring survive and thrive, the genetic line is considered strong.
Want an example? Look at the Biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
The old human line is destroyed under the guise of “moral failure,” and a new lineage is tested through Lot and his daughters. Seen through a genetic lens, this is less about sin and more about selective breeding.
So the real question of what’s “normal” is a question of genetics, not morality.
If the genes are clean — nature allows reproduction.
If the genes are flawed — nature imposes a silent ban. Simple.
Now here’s another piece of knowledge most people are never told:
Racial hybrids (mixed-race offspring) often carry subtle genetic incompatibilities — and by the third generation, those issues can express as physical or cognitive problems. This isn’t ideology. It’s biology.
So ask yourself:
Why do so many “underdeveloped” countries with sky-high birth rates 
never test DNA compatibility between partners?
Why is paternity based solely on a mother’s word — with no requirement for genetic verification?
The answer is simple: a sick population is easier to control.
Physically or mentally vulnerable children are more dependent, more obedient, and more susceptible to propaganda.
And when people aren’t even sure who their real father is, it’s easier for the system to manage them.
Paternity confusion becomes a tool of power — just like language, media, or war.
You can get a paternity test to prove you aren’t the father.
Genetics doesn’t make a good father. Choosing self=other does.
Those attempting to control stuff are in for an unpleasant surprise, otherwise.
The issue isn’t about what someone can do — it’s about passing a legal act that requires a paternity test before a father’s name is added to a birth certificate.
Think about the consequences:
The boss will think three times before bending his secretary over.
His wife will stop sleeping with the driver.
We’d finally see real morality — not the kind made up to serve appearances.
And millions of falsely named fathers would no longer be forced to support children that aren’t theirs.
If the father wants to claim kids regardless of genetic paternity, let him. This is stupid.
Oh, I get it. He wants to blame a law, rather than hearing his wife say, “What, you don’t trust me?”
Or perhaps it’s a woman who wants to know if her husband’s secretary is pregnant with his child? She can’t force the woman to prove paternity without the state’s help.
I’m so glad I’m too old for this sh**.
“What’s truly stupid is not having a law — and not demanding that the authorities pass one.”
People live in shit because they still haven’t learned to crap in a toilet.
A law requiring mandatory paternity testing isn’t just relevant — it’s absolutely essential.
The government will never pass it, because they’re all rapists and perverts.
Of course, a law that goes against the interests of those in power is a complete nonstarter.
…who are you quoting?
If a relationship is based on monogamous trust, if you need a dna test, the relationship already has issues. Either someone has so much pain from prior betrayals that they are hyperjealous, or the other one is not trustworthy, or doesn’t know how to alleviate the other’s insecurities.
If the state wants everyone’s DNA for its OWN reasons, though, I can see them going this route.
When a sheep learns to drive, goes to school, or finally gets a job — they’re required to present a health certificate. Why? Because health must meet certain standards.
So why is there no standard for establishing paternity?
Because the people in power are scum.
I’m honestly surprised. Why should I have to explain something so obvious? A child listed on official documents should genetically match the father — unless we’re talking about adoption.
Why are you even arguing this? Are you stupid, a predator, or just afraid to find out the kids might not be yours?
Pretty sure they’re mine.
Absolutely not. There used to be a video floating around on /pol/ and elsewhere, can’t find it now though, where a man with one arm climbs over a wall in an obstacle course and all the female trainees can’t complete the task. Many such cases.
Same with blacks in public schools. DEI had to lower all math classes and requirements to pass them; because blacks couldn’t / still can’t graduate high school with the old standards in place.
Indeed, in terms of size and scope, it’s the Mormons and Amish who will keep the white race going in the United States during the coming decades. It sucks that white people need to resort to fanatical religion to sustain and grow a society. Fairy tales and superstitions seem to be linked to population growth for some strange reason.
Being immunized & passing a physical to make sure you’re fit for the job aren’t unreasonable.
A dna test does not prove paternal or maternal fitness — you gotta shit-test ‘em.
Premarital & preparental counseling oughtta be taught in school, but instead they teach weird shit.
A DNA test establishes the fact of paternity — nothing more needs to be proven there.
But I fully agree that schools teach useless nonsense.
In fact, I know exactly how to fix the education system: just conduct large-scale testing among adults and, based on the results, teach only what’s actually needed in real life.
Males low in testosterone and low in male hierarchy are more than happy to surrogate parent the alpha-male’s genetic kin, for him.
Cuckoldry is rampant in the Hominid specie. You seem unable to discern this simple scientific fact and observation.
Here’s another fact: there’s a war between Faith and Reason. You are a servant of Faith — I serve Reason. Faith is incapable of understanding or accepting anything rational.