All other things aside, where’s the romance…? How’s marriage gonna work out if Dad’s pretty much paid in extra-marital sex with supermodels…? And Mum paid in centimeters of Adonis-penis…?
Maybe the two of you could start it up, and if it looks like it’s working other people might join in?
Alright, alright, just a suggestion. 
You need more than two people to form a sexocracy.
Marriage is no longer legally recognised in Sexocratic society. I view marriage as a form of slavery.
What, and working yourself to the bone so you can sleep with a hooker isn’t…? I mean, as slavery goes, marriage is probably easier… 
Dear Gods so this is what Testosterone looks like in text form… wow, just wow.
The OP makes me think of that show Firefly, of how the Companions (prostitutes) are considered some of the most respectable members of society, able to open doors into worlds that a lowly “normal” person would otherwise never enter.
You don’t have to work yourself to the bone in a Sexocracy. Just contribute your fair share. If you’re not prepared to do that you can go on standard status which is for people who don’t work.
No one is forced to work, no one is owned by anyone else, so there’s no slavery.
This is what society looks like in its optimal form. Where men and women can always have sexual fulfillment.
Please forget any mean thing I may have ever said about you.
If you have ever said anything mean to or about me, I don’t remember it. In fact, I don’t remember ever having a conversation with you, period, unless it was under a different screen name of yours. If we’ve exchanged any kind of words, they weren’t memorable ones, so I guess that pretty much takes care of that.
Out of curiosity, why would my knowledge of a cheesy scifi show change what you think about me? I mean, it’s a decent show, makes me laugh, but it’s not amazing or anything.
Blurry said “period”. And she’s a girl. That’s gotta mean something… 
I take it back…
I used to be pezermeregild and I think I said something about being glad I’m no son of yours at some point.
Ah, men and their need for sex. In such society a straight male will eventually find himself at the very bottom of the pecking order.
If sex is the currency, then females will end up at the top: prostitutes, as well as women who will use ‘free’ sex for manipulative reasons.
Then gay men prostitutes.
Then regular straight men.
Yes, dear straight male, you will end up below a gay man-whore.
Well, take it back then, Indian giver! Oh my bad, that wasn’t PC. Oops. Anyway, like I said, it wasn’t memorable.
Should a person be thankful to be someone’s son if that someone watches Firefly?
If they are decent human beings, most definetly.
Are you picking up on my subliminal messages?
Somehow I get the feeling that that is supposed to be a crack at me. Oh noes!
damn no one has hit me up for sex, at least blatantly, since my first post in this thread
And that is why I said what I said. Only a man would make it mechanical, technical and remove any of the real soul.
Women like to play down their need for sex to avoid accusations of hypocrisy when they show contempt for heterosexual men and their desires.
Sex isn’t the currency in a Sexocracy. Status is the currency. Those who sell sex receive the highest status.
The idea of the Sexocratic society is that all human beings are fundamentally equal in value, but Sexocratic society needs to create certain superficial inequalities to express this.
I don’t think any human being is ‘below’ anyone. I don’t find being compared to a gay man or a whore insulting as I’m not homophobic and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with being a whore.
I like your picture.