dude you are making sex a commodity a thing to buy and gain You are taking it away from a private intimate loving situation and putting it on the auction block. if you can’t see that then I can’t really do anything else. It should remain as it is.
You’re just repeating the same mantra the authorities always preach. Sex is only for private intimate loving situations. What ends up happening with that attitude?- lots of raped choirboys and dead prostitutes, and parents raping their own kids. Like I say, the more you try to change the truth the more it will destroy you. And also the more you try to change the truth the more innocent victims get violated.
How many is ‘lots’ exactly…? And how many is it as a percentage of the global population…? And is that percentage growing with time, or declining…? I mean, I know you’re talking out of your ass, but at least talk out of your ass well.
It’s very difficult to tell how many children get sexually abused as it’s something that is frequently kept secret. The 2004 John Ray Report estimates 10667 victims of sex abuse by clergy under 18 in the US alone. That sounds like ‘lots’ to me.
A report on the BBC estimated that there are 1 million children under 12 being abused in the UK which has a population of over 60 million. So that’s about 100 million worldwide. It’s very difficult to tell, so it’s between 1-2% of the population. I think the percentage is about staying the same.
Thanks for the figures. Be interesting to know the tolerances, and what criteria counts as abuse - is it abuse if a 12 year old fiddles with an 11 year-old, or is it playing doctors etc…? - but, even so, that’s a lot of hurt.
I dunno, I buy the premise that a lot of evil is spawned via sexual frustration, but I don’t buy the idea a hypersexualized society ratified by law would alleviate the problems of abuse. I do see a lot of really bored people dry-humping eachother though. Maybe I’m just old and confused.
Thanks, tab. I’m guessing you’ve changed your mind about me talking out of my ass now?
Children always end up playing sexual games with each other, that’s just natural and part of growing up, it’s not abuse. The 1 million figure refers to the 1 million children under 12 being abused by 3-4 hundred thousand adults. The abusing behaviour ranging from sexual touching to rape, torture and murder.
My society is not a ‘hypersexualised’ society. It’s a realist society. The reality is that we have all been sexualised by evolution. We are all sexual beings and all societies revolve around sex no matter how much they try to deny it. The Sexocracy is the society that exists in harmony with reality.
I guess so, the sound of your voice seems to have risen a little further North. Belly-button height maybe.
I’m the greatest philosopher of all time. You should respect that.
Sexual abusers are not going to stop abusing in such a way. It simply won’t stop it. A ped does not want a true partner they want to own, control and be superior. children give them this. Its part genetics and its part rearing. In your society it will still occur at the same numbers. A rapist ,an abuser are not thinking about sex they are thinking about control and being master.
That’s because we live in a society fixated on finding fundamental inequalities in value between human beings.
In the Sexocracy there are only superficial inequalities created to allow the true nature of the fundamental equality of all human beings to express itself.
Child abuse and rape are manifestations of a society that psychotically perceives fundamental inequalities between human beings. In the truly egalitarian society of the Sexocracy these violations will not occur, or at least they will be greatly reduced.
](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/uploads/default/original/2X/7/7c349bf1053f368a5729d053e1e91215f22ce66c.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
Tab, you are a master of words could you please explain what I am talking about to him. I feel like there is a brick wall.
I know what you are talking about you don’t need to get someone else to explain.
I think you are wrong and I am right.
No you don’t know obviously. Tab is far superior at explaining things
K. havin’ a fink.
The John Jay report covers Roman Catholic dioceses during a 50-year span, so that 10,667 actually averages out to about 220 allegations, per year, in the U.S. It also indicated that allegation levels decreased after the 1960s; what source are you basing your claim that percentages are staying the same?
I’m curious as to how your proposal would mitigate the effects of millenia during which women have evolved to be fairly selective about their sexual partners. Most aren’t real interested in indiscriminate sex, financial or social gain notwithstanding.
It’s those pesky genes, survival of the fittest or some such thing.
Thanks AnitaS.
When I said percentages were staying the same I was referring to all sexual abuse worldwide. With the Catholic church I think the priests have mostly stopped raping children since they’ve realised they can’t actually do it without getting caught.
Men and women are selective about having beautiful young sexual partners. Heterosexual women want to have sex with beautiful young men. They pretend they don’t sometimes, but they do.
Everyone wants to have sex with beautiful young people of one sex or the other and not feel guilty about it. That’s what the Sexocracy provides.
Ahaha. Yeah… One problem, you have not produced even a single idea or even sentence worth remembering or that is even slightly productive.
And we don’t need sex to be happy. It isn’t even the greatest physical pleasure. Try oxycodone. I will take a bottle of oxy over that gooey baby-launcher between a female’s legs any day of the fucking week.
Besides, you are ignoring the extreme degree to which power is involved in sex. Fat, ugly men do not enjoy sex with beautiful women, because they do not feel powerful in it. They have to feel wanted to exert their power.
Prostitutes only appeal to self-hating men. The shame in it becomes a turn-on for them, they get a sense of power by making the whore feel like she is doing something dirty by sleeping with their fat, ugly, self.
The whore- because one only needs to pay for her and not actually win her, is consequently not seen as appealing by most men. Go ask the males you know if, given that they couldn’t get laid, they would purchase a whore if they didn’t have to worry about disease or laws. Most would say no, they wouldn’t purchase the whore. There is no sense of power in it, if one does not need to win the woman. Human psychology proves your bullshit is just that, equal2u, bullshit. Back up your claims with more than your autistic rambling, get some evidence, do a study, get some historical precedents in sexually liberated cultures like ancient Greece, any number of things to embolden your “idea.”