Sexual Revolution

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

I was visiting marxists.org and read Chapters 6 and 7 about sexual revolution. I read all the Chapters before it also. They make a strong argument that Sexual Revolution will save society and that Communism without Sexual Revolution is only surface-communism and not real communist revolution.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/brinton/1970/irrational-politics.htm

@MrAuthoritarian , @promethean75 , and @Peter_Kropotkin I would like to hear your opinions on this.

The texts state clearly that sexual repression is the result of Abrahamism and Patriarchy, and that Patriarchy and Abrahamism causes sexual repression and dysfunction. In Matriarchal ancient pagan societies, all males got laid and there wasn’t mass inceldom everywhere, or so they say. Sexual inequality began from Patriarchal hierarchies and wealth hoarding.

But in the current modern society and modern world, “sexual revolution” just sounds like sexual capitalism and hypergamy, mass inceldom everywhere. The Matriarchy of this world seems more like “Feminazis” than “Feminists”. Some of the more modern Marxists come off as tyrannical sexual prudes and such. There is a popular Marxist guy online who looks like a genetic clone of Lenin, and said he believes in “life imprisonment” for rapists, which seems a bit harsh and more like modern Puritan prudish drivel.

1 Like
2

@futureone

Friedrich Engels made a mistake with feminism and so did a lot of early Marxists.

It’s clear by now which of the sexes is more materialistic. Radical feminism has been a disaster for mankind.

:clown_face:

1 Like
3

I’m going to say to MrAuthoritarian …

I think it’s all for war. Like…some war’s gonna happen for America and then it’ll all be over with.

*YAWN*

Feminism, everybody’s busy talking about it and doing it and the it’s gon be like BAM. Everyone runs back home and hides with their husbands.

I feel that way about Atheism too.

4

I’m not a female, so what I’m about to say is probably very presumptuous and maybe even misinformed.

But in the west, we often look abroad to, for example, Muslim women, and outline them as an example of female oppression.

If I was a woman, then personally, I would prefer to be Muslim and wear a hijab, then my sexuality wouldn’t be the main focus anymore. It wouldn’t be considered acceptable for me to go on “onlyfans” and denigrate myself and reduce myself to an object of sexual desire, nothing more. I don’t call that freedom, not at all, it’s being a slave to male lust.

The man in such a society has the role of protector and provider, and I think that deep down, this is what many females actually want from their spouses and partners.

I realise that some more extreme Muslim communities punish what they perceive to be female impropriety quite harshly, I do not agree with that at all, and regard it as very primitive behaviour.

1 Like
5

marxists.org was talking about a hypothetical ancient Matriarchal pagan society.

Modern feminism is entrenched in Abrahamism and Capitalism and the result is some monstrous social dystopia.

1 Like
6

Yes very primitive. I think a proper society would take the best of both worlds, which is the hijab and burka, but without the primitive punishments to women.

That is probably a result of Western, Abrahamic, Capitalist, Authoritarian norms. What women want biologically is a good looking man who listens and is good in bed. Beta bux alpha fux.

1 Like
7

@futureone

All matriarchal societies either collapse internally or get conquered historically.

:clown_face:

8

yes thats true. there needs to be a based female warrior society that has tech. But most females are cucks that wont do that and will be conquered by barbarian warlord males.

image
image1223Ă—1600 314 KB

Now you see why i believe in futarani. Mathematically no other way.

1 Like
9

@futureone

Even all of the ancient Greek Amazonians were slain overtime, matriarchies never last for long.

:clown_face:

10

The Greek male empire fell too, what’s your point?

I just said I computed that Futarani is the only way for Matriarchy since most females are cucks and averse to military might.

1 Like
11

In essence, it has the opposite effect. By leaving something to the imagination, an individual can become more sexually appealing by encouraging a potential partner to idealize them,

12

The point of a hijab and burka is to desexualize women, and to make life more tolerable for males.

Same reason males and females were segregated publicly, why there are mens and womens restrooms, men and women separated at the workplace.

Mainly because women are paranoid and afraid of men, and also to benefit men so they don’t get all horny and getting a oneitus, and feelings of unrequited lust.

Women aren’t afraid of lesbians like they are afraid of men. And men are less bothered by a homosexual in the workplace, than they are by sexual tension and sexual frustration from being near a woman that doesn’t feel the same way.

Of course the modern “woke” paradigm says that burkas are bad, hijabs are bad, segregation is bad, and that we dare not disagree. Even though “woke” also says all religions and cultures are valid, and therefore “woke” implicitly declares that burkas and hijabs are good…

In essence, it has the opposite effect. By leaving something to the imagination, an individual can become more sexually appealing by encouraging a potential partner to idealize them,

That’s true to some extent. But the problem with not embracing burkas and hijabs is when there’s a woman that’s really hot, men get uncontrollable lust and feelings of unrequited lust. This is basically women sexually molesting men without their consent. If a woman dresses in such a way to purposefully sexually arouse someone, how is that not sexual molestation? Its mass sexual molestation of thousands of men.

Society has an anti-male bias though so they don’t realize the ethical problems of this. For example women are allowed to abort a man’s child against his consent. They don’t even view women and men as a couple in a relationship.

If a man physically molests one women, society is outraged. But if a woman molests thousands of men by not touching them physically with atoms, but instead touches them with physical photons only, society views it as fine. One could just write off society as “primitive apes” and be done with it.

13

“but instead touches them with physical photons only, society views it as fine”

This is patently false. I’ve not only touched females with photons only but have even done so unwittingly and am still serving a life sentence of complete social alienation, career difficulty, housing difficulty, travel difficulty, local movement restriction, and revoked constitutional rights… and this is all after doing six years in prison and jails.

1 Like
14

Hmm I see there is indeed a flaw in my post… how would you re-word it?

15

I am asking the following question in a very profound sense, so as to bring this thread to a deeply phenomenological level.

Would anybody like to view erotic images of me, a transgender boy->girl? I’ve taken them over the course of much of the last decade. When I was previously hanging out on the UF campus (which I haven’t done for quite some time, due to the frigid nature of the campus socio-political climate), a female student actually confided in me that she used them as an aid for masturbation.

I already tried posting some pictures to the official “post a picture thread”, but the system wouldn’t let me… I guess I don’t have enough “rep” here with this brand new account (I’ve had several previous accounts). So I’m glad to be forced to actually spell out my full intentions to you all beforehand.

2 Likes
16

I would suggest not posting them in a public thread… you seem like an interesting character and I would hate to see you banned so suddenly. You can send me them privately if you want :heart_eyes:

17

Ha, this is funny!!! 67!!!