Shame/Pride

I set myself up as the satanic accuser, a demonic spirit of retribution, trying to dig-out nobility from those who lived in shame; wanting to manipulate what preachers and rabbis had turned into guilt to agitate the labouring spirit.
Then, I discovered how shameless the world was, using shame only to escape its audacity, and realized how alien to nobility the average man remains, and how words, for such as them, are but a means of detachment from themselves, and their shameless existence.


Never let the shameless ones burden you with their shame.


“Earning” is the sacrifice that bestows sacredness.


Shame & Guilt were not invented by Abrahamism, or any ideology, or spiritual dogma; they were weaponized, used as a tool to manipulate and exploit, honed on the whetstone of lies. Christians, in particular, used a hypothetical primordial event to shame and seed guilt among its minions. Just as it promoted a false and duplicitous conception of free-will, they manipulated a natural emerging insecurity – produced by an emerging self-awareness – offering the recompense of a possible relief through total submission and a symbolic sacrificing of oneself.
Shame – in the Pagan sense – denotes a holding oneself accountable, not to an external will but to one’s own principles, one’s own ancestors, values, ideals.
One does not feel guilty about some event that occurred without his participation, nor his consent, but one feels guilty when he fails to live-up to his own standards, or when he actively disappoints his own conception of himself.


In the Biblical allegory of Adam & Eve we can find the roots of what later developed into a nihilistic psychosis, now being manipulated by a parasitical meme.[size=60] [ MANifesto: Word Wars – Diagnosis – Virus-Meme – Parasite-Meme][/size]
‘Adam & Eve’s awakening to their own nakedness’ is a metaphorical way of saying that they became self-conscious.
Self-Consciousness is where nihilistic psychosis germinates and develops its defensive ideologies.
Animals do not feel self-conscious because they are only conscious of otherness, of an external world, so they cannot feel ashamed. Only a species that can perceive itself in relation to world – and to the degree that it can do so – can feel vulnerability (insecurity), and the pangs of guilt and shame. Let’s keep in mind that all value-judgements are juxtapositions; animals are trapped in their subjectivity. To become conscious of oneself presupposes the ability to noetically juxtapose this growing self-awareness with that of an awareness of world, which precedes it, or of another consciousness, from the vantage point of a third.
Man can now judge himself in relation to another, and feel small, weak, and not good enough, by the objective comparison.
We’ve already described that the simplest form of empathizing – the most primitive form is sympathy, viz., mind simply projecting into another its awareness and its own understanding of itself, or what it knows of itself. Subsequently, such a consciousness presumes that another is itself in a given circumstance. It’s a very simplistic method and that is why it evolves first. This method, of projection, developed into the simplest, most primitive form of spirituality, i.e., man projecting into world, even into inanimate things – into what he found mysterious and incomprehensible – his own understanding and knowledge of himself; he projected into the unknown what is intimately known to him. Man sees, in all things, himself reflected back – Deism – gradually modifying this projection into a refined, idealized, conception of himself – a singular idea – i.e., one-god.


Shame is the first reaction of man discovering himself among others in a shared world. He evaluates himself in relation to another – particularly of his own kind – and he begins to feel insecure.
How does he cope with this insecurity? He returns to what he knows the best – himself; he returns to his past, to his infancy, a period when a parent was present to comfort him, and guide him, enveloping him and taking care of him; he reverts to a state of ignorant innocence, i.e., forgetfulness {[size=80]Λήθη[/size]}.


Shame is the passion of nihilism – shamelessness evolving into a reactionary coping mechanism.


When personal judgements are usurped by another’s judgements, shame is experienced – self-consciousness feeling vulnerable under the gaze of another; when the judgement of an-other is usurped by personal judgement, pride is felt – self-consciousness either denying the validity of another’s judgement, or having reached a level of self-awareness that exceeds that of the other, feeling secure in his judgemental gaze.
Both can be the wellsprings of contentment and/or discontentment.


Do not fight untested arrogance. Let it take you to its inevitable humiliation.


Where shame & guilt is low there is little hope for dignity to flourish.


Pride is maligned these days. It is included within the vices all men should try to quell within themselves. But pride is really a benefit to the individual – a product of honesty and balance.


To be in control of all emotions and sensations affecting the brain, is to be willful and rational, totally engaged in the world.
Pride prevents the ego from overstepping a self-imposed limit towards actions that threaten to shame it. Without this self-imposed limit egoism loses itself in self-aggrandizing solipsism, unable to guard against those things that may soil its integrity and injure its sense of self-worth.

To be proud is not to be arrogant and pretentious; this is a form of pride which is out of control, compensating for a secret self-doubt.
To truly know yourself – to be self-aware – is to acknowledge the negatives aspects of oneself, in relation to another. To be proud is to desire to correct these negatives; to strive to surpass and to improve oneself.


Shame emerges as an automatic reaction to an inconsistency between mind and body.


Shame is the product of a mind being contradicted by the body’s automated reactions, i.e., meme/gene dissonance. [ MANifesto: Word Wars – Meme & Gene Dynamics]


Their one-god converted shame to guilt, and with his death, shamelessness has become the updated worship of an absence, fulfilled by man’s ego.


A man can fall beneath an animal when he exaggerates his attempt to overcome shame, becoming accustomed to the rewarding relief of shamelessness. Through this loss, some discover the only kind of pride left to them.


Where there is no shame there is no possibility for self-correction, for self-control… for dignity, and nobility. Shame is the judgement of another taken to heart. Shamelessness is indifference, disrespect, for all others – a beneficial escape with a postponed cost.


With no shame, integrity has no hope.

The only unshakable egoism is the one that has passed through the tempering fires of humility. The end result is like a flexible, unbreakable, blade.
Those that have only experienced the end-result, and not the process of making steel, will think that it was never soft and malleable; those that experience an ego that has gone through the purifying furnaces will insist on imposing upon it a new round of smelting to make it soft and hot, something they can reshape.


Maybe the quintessential expression of nihilistic inversion is humility. A normal reaction to a threat is fear, but with humility, self-pity enters the scene to beg for redemption from an indifferent world.


All men are humbled at some point in their lives – if not by other men then by existence itself, by time. The level of arrogance, and disconnection from reality, determines how this humbling will be experienced.


Modern men would rather live in lies than face a moment of harsh, indifferent, reality. They prefer platitudes and counterfeited interests concerning anything that might lurk in the depths of the soul. Their highest achievement can be surmised as being nothing besides a quick and painless passing through a world they find deplorable, all the while tanked-up on the profligacy their surrender offers.


Modernity’s most despicable characters are the ones who feign modesty when in their heart they consider this a sign of their ascendency above a world they have grown to despise.


Humiliation imposes humility before the crowd, when humility before individuals would have averted the spectacle.


Lowering oneself before another allows them to feel equal or to experience empowering pity.
Pity evokes a sense of inferiority, and the sense of equality evokes an ambition to surpass, therefore humility invites abuse, exposing pretences.
At the same time it promotes positive emotions in others so as to create and enhance relationships by reducing competitiveness and conflict.
Reciprocity is possible – the open sharing of personal vulnerabilities invites a sharing of commonalities.

When a rule has been intentionally transgressed, socialized man feels guilt, accepting responsibility and the costs that follow.


As with anxiety, guilt is the temporal extension of an emotion – in this case, shame. Fear still peaks from beneath the complexities of the particular, showing us that fear – far from being just another sensation – is the primary; a primary/primal reaction to an unknown, chaotic, world.


When a Jew quotes a Hellene, another human is drowned in guilt, to be reborn a Christian.


Abrahamism, made secular humanist, i.e., nihilistic – absolving itself of shame by adopting guilt; then absolving itself of guilt by accusing another.
Neurosis is shame that cannot be expunged by an admission of guilt, nor by unloading it upon another.


When the Jews set-up their Holy Kingdom on earth they sought a method by which every member of the tribe would monitor and keep in-line, with their collective rules, every other member. God became the eye-in-the-sky but more was needed to peer into those dark places where no eye, divine or otherwise, could ever see.
Guilt became the perfect scrying tool; a crystal ball polished by the hidden fear of being discovered in the darkest of all dark corners; an anxiety that one day, somehow, somewhere, someone, would know of a personal transgression.


A noble spirit holds itself accountable to itself, before others.


Guilt is the sensation of holding oneself accountable to an external and/or an internal standard. The former can be escaped, through excuses, but the latter is inescapable. Conscience cannot be tricked, nor silenced; it is the mind recognizing liability before its own stated principles.


No guilt touches the mind if it feels no shame.


Christianity’s “primordial sin” is an attempt to impose upon man the inheritance of collective guilt, meant to cultivate collectivized shame.
The penalty is a lifetime of contrition, and self-abnegation.
Shame indicates the acceptance of this guilty inheritance.


Shame we feel in private; guilt we feel before others.


The circumcised psychologist reminds us of the association of sin with guilt, as an awakening of one’s own culpability in existential suffering. Heaven lost is the loss of innocence, associated with ignorance. To know is to become aware of your own participation in the suffering of another, and in one’s own suffering. It is a ‘burden’ one had to unload upon the metaphorical concept of Satan, i.e., a horned scapegoat, associated with the circumcised psychologist’s superego, where god/devil reside in every man.
The path towards neurosis is revealed when an individual, adopting Abrahamic ethics, realizes his very existence necessitates contradicting his own egocentric values – for how could one continue to believe in his own innocence when his own participation in the suffering of others has been revealed, i.e., loss of his ignorance negates his innocence.
The heathen call to know thyself – compelling a movement towards objectivity, away from the manimal state of subjectivity, i.e., ignorant bliss – becomes a tempting devilish call to take another bite from the ‘tree of knowledge’ and descend further down into the pits of reality’s hell.
Denial of ‘free-will’ is a denial of the very possibility of being an agency that can choose either way; an attempt to regain entrance back into the Garden of Eden, i.e., forgetfulness; crossing the river Lethe while still alive, and becoming one of the living dead; a furtive desire to return back to the Platonic cave of subjective ideals.
The nihilistic, binary concept of absolute good, necessitating absolute evil, is the mental source of this conundrum. When you’ve ethically defined morality outside existence, your desire to live-up to this supernatural, unrealistic, standard, necessitates further self-deceptions.
A foundational error in judgement, requires further adjustments to preserve the original error; schizophrenia is essential to ensure the survival of a debilitating ensuing mind/body dissonance, leading to compartmentalized semiotic detachments, attempting to protect an individual’s ego from dire consequences. Transgenderism is the final end of this ‘logic’ remaining true to its own irrational premises: neurosis follows, to square a circle with chemicals and continuous sharing, unloading the burden upon a collective that is forced to share the guilt.

“Guilt is merely the first form of knowledge; and pride, not even the first.”

Pride is the denial of life if on certain criteria are maintained.

Pride is a refusal to submit to lies and degeneracy, because the majority is doing so.
Pride is holding yourself to a standard - an ideal, outside yourself.