Should A Christian Arrest A Judge?

Should A Christian Arrest A Judge? Well, they are all crooked so. . . .“Yes”

			Did You Know You Can Arrest A Judge?

Minnesota Statute 629.37 When a Private Person May Make An Arrest.
A private person may arrest another:
(1) for a public offense committed or attempted in the arresting person’s presence;
(2) when the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in the arresting person’s presence; or
(3) when a felony has in fact been committed, and the arresting person has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it.

Minnesota Statute 629.38 Requiring A Private Person to Disclose Cause of Arrest.
Before making an arrest a private person shall inform the person to be arrested of the cause of the arrest and require the person to submit. The warning required by this section need not be given if the person is arrested while committing the offense or when the person is arrested on pursuit immediately after committing the offense. If a person has committed a felony, a private person may break open an outer or inner door or window of a dwelling house to make the arrest if, before entering, the private person informs the person to be arrested of the intent to make the arrest and the private person is then refused admittance.

Minnesota Statute 629.39 Requiring Private Person Making Arrest To Deliver Arrestee To Judge Or Peace Officer.
A private person who arrests another for a public offense shall take the arrested person before a judge or to a peace officer without unnecessary delay. If a person arrested escapes, the person from whose custody the person has escaped may immediately pursue and retake the escapee, at any time and in any place in the state. For that purpose, the pursuer informs the escapee of the intent to arrest the escapee and the pursuer is refused admittance.
Isn’t a dishonest judge committing the crime of Obstruction of Justice?

			Why Should You Arrest A Judge?

Well, if the judge wants you to be an “honest and law abiding citizen”, then the judge had better practice what he is preaching. If the hypocritical judge is not honest nor law abiding, it is your duty as an “honest and law abiding citizen” to place the dishonest judge under arrest. Did you know there is also a religious duty to place a dishonest judge under arrest? Did you know that Jesus Christ commanded His followers to judge with righteous judgment? [Do not judge by appearance, but judge with righteous judgment. John 7:24]. Righteous judgment and the consequences to society by failing to judge with righteous judgment are discussed in the

following verses: Deut. 1:16; Matt. 7:1:2; Job 29: 1-25; 1 Kings 3:16-28; Job 34:17; Proverbs 29: 1,4,7,12,14,16,24,26,27; Isaiah 1: 16-23; Ezekiel 22:23-31; Mich 3:1-3; Amos 5: 7,10,15; 1 John 2:4, Rev 22:14; Amos 6:12; Mich 7:3. So if the judge claims to be “Christian”, demand that he judges righteous judgment (a real Christian will have no problem with obeying the commands of Christ) [“Teaching them to observe ALL THINGS that I have commanded you…”, Matthew 28:20].

If the “Christian” judge fails to practice righteous judgment from the bench he is a lawless sinner since he has disobeyed the commands of Christ to judge righteous judgment [“And then I will declare to them I never knew you; Depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!” Matthew 7:23; “I tell you I do not know or where you are from. Depart from me, all you workers of iniquity (sin).” Luke 13:27; “But why do you call Me “Lord, Lord” and do not the things I say?” Luke 6:46]

What Happens When A Dishonest Judge Is Rendering Judgment upon you?

The answer is found in Habakkuk 1:4, “Therefore the law is powerless, and justice never goes forth. For the wicked surround the righteous; therefore perverse judgment proceeds.” So it is in your best interest, for multiple reasons, to arrest a dishonest, unrighteous, and lawbreaking judge.

How Can You Tell If The Judge Is Honest (righteous) Or Dishonest (unrighteous)?

1.Ask him if he is honest (righteous) or dishonest (unrighteous). If the judge is honest
he will have no problem clearly stating on the official court transcript that he is honest (righteous). In fact, a Christian is to proclaim he is an honest judge to “everyone who asks” about his faith. [But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear.” 1 Peter 3:15]. If he is a dishonest judge (or a false Christian/a wolf in sheep’s clothing), he will refuse to answer you “yes” or “no”, but instead will try to change the subject [for everyone practicing evil hates the light, lest his deeds should be exposed”, John 3:20].
2.Ask the judge if he is also called “Justitia”. If he says “yes” you are dealing with a dishonest and unrighteous judge. He is a member of a religious cult who worship Justitia, the Roman pagan goddess who was the personification of justice…”. “Personification: A virtue or abstract quality represented a deity.” …”Many of the personifications were regarded as deities and had a recognizable cult. The personified virtues included … Iustitia (Justice) …”. Adkins, Lesly and Adkins, Roy A. “Dictionary of Roman Religion” (New York:1996), Page 110, 178. [Note: the letter “J” was not invented until the 14th Century. The Roman letter “I” is now represented by the letter “J”. So “Iustitia is now spelled “Justitia”. You may recognize her depicted as a woman with a blindfold holding scales; also known as “Lady Justice”]. Justitia: Latin Justice. A jurisdiction or office of a judge. Black’s Law Dictionary 5th addition, page 778. So if the judge says he is called “Justitia”, you are dealing with a member of a pagan religious cult – a sure sign of an unrighteous and dishonest judge. Remember the cult doesn’t want Jesus or the 10 commandments in their pagan courts. “Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.” 1 John 5:21
3.Is he wearing a black robe? Did you know that is his public declaration that the judge is unrighteous and dishonest? Why would an honest (righteous) judge wear black when black is symbolic of evil? White is symbolic of honesty and righteousness. [Around the throne were twenty-four thrones, and on the thrones I saw twenty-four elders sitting, clothed in white robes; and they had crowns of gold on their heads. Revelation 4:4].
4.Ask him if a percentage of all the fines go into his retirement fund? Did you know black robed judges have this arrangement “legally”? It is called an “institutionalized bribe”. He makes more of a profit the larger the fines. So the judge has an interest in making sure he hands out many fines. [“Here I am. Witness against me before the Lord and before His anointed; whose ox have I taken, or whose donkey have I taken, or whom have I cheated? Whom have I oppressed, or from whose hand have I received any bribe with which to blind my eyes? I will restore it to you.” 1 Sam. 12:3]
5.Have you noticed multiple lies in the police report (fabrication of evidence – obstruction of justice)? Have you noticed the prosecuting attorney using these lies to convict you (conspiracy to obstruct justice)? Have you noticed your public “defender” (public pretender) or your private attorney trying to keep you quiet about the lies (tampering with a witness or intimidation of a witness-obstruction of justice)? If the judge allows liars to submit lies as evidence to convict you, when you object to the lies, you are a victim of a dishonest (unrighteous) judge. [If a ruler pays attention to lies, all his servants become wicked. Proverbs 29:12]

	What Are The Benefits Of Arresting A Dishonest Judge?

1.People will learn to desire righteous judgment. [With my soul I have desired You in the night, yes, by my spirit within me I will seek You early; for when Your judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness. Isaiah 26:9] (See also 1 Kings 3:16-28; Proverbs 29:26
2.Did you know that an arrested judge can never hear another case against you? Do you know he will have to recuse himself from any further cases with you?
3.Did you know if enough people arrest a dishonest judge (or file complaints against or sues the dishonest judge) he cannot be a judge anymore? He would have failed to maintain the integrity of the judiciary. [“Those things he says will be done, and he will have whatever he says.” Mark 11:23]. By the way, a Christian should not hire an attorney. What a Christian should do in court is outlined in Luke 21:12-15; Luke 12: 11-12; Matthew 10:16-20; and Mark 12:9-11. Remember, justice come from Jesus, the Son of God (Proverbs 29:26).

		Do you need to file a complaint against a Judge?

Judicial Standards Board
2025 Centre Point Blvd.
Mendota Heights, MN 55120

		Do you need to file a complaint against an Attorney? 

Lawyer’s Professional Responsibility Board
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter St.
St. Paul, MN 55102

		Remember it is your duty to file a complaint!

	Copy And Pass To Your Fellow Victims Of Unrighteous Judges!!!

		        Real Christians Don't Hire Attorneys! 
		The Spirit of Christ Speaks For Them In Court!

Black is not the color of evil and so what if a judge belongs to a cult and does not care for christianity? Christianity is not the Law in the USA. A dishonest person is one who judges others by such ridiculous things in order to promote only their religion. You would have all non christians become second class citizens? Sorry, can’t have that without a fight.

A religion or clothes do not make a person dishonest, it is what is with in that does that. Alot of “christians” are fairly evil by my standards. Should I say all christians are murderous thieving god whores?

On this planet it is. Maybe you are from another dimension?

Oh but a religious court is against the law in America. Something about separation of church/state. The court of Jusitita is a religious court. Which is why you must honor justitia when he/she comes in by rising or face the wrath of justitia.

And Ezra opened the book in the sight of all the people; (for he was above all the people;) and when he opened it, all the people stood up: Nehemiah 8:5

Too late your cult courts already do that. All Christians are treated as second-class.

Yeah that must be from your dimension as the Absolute Truth says worship of Satan or the world is evil. But hey thanks for your unsubstantiated opinions.

What about assassination? Arresting a judge sounds a little hypocritical to me.

That kind of talk can/will get you arrested in Amerika! Even thrown in prison. You can arrest a judge have nothing happen to you.

Arresting a judge would get one put into a mental asylum. If you could even; I could see the bailiff shooting you. But Shamgar; my present view on matters such as these are that taking out a judge is futile; you’ve got to take out the culture and the majority of people who support the judges, otherwise, for each one you arrest or assassinate another will just come and take his place.

Ahh, I see so any that do not follow the christian bible automatically worship Satan? My opinions are unsubstantiated? Yours are just ignorant and filled with bigoted fear. You have given them substance by misinterpreting fragments of a religious text. Its fearful christians like you that pervert all the good works that jesus really could have done for humanity.
Get over your superstitions and try to be a little less fearful of those that think and see things differently. A color is not a sign of evil. Jeez do you avoid walking under ladders too? or run screaming from a black cat?

Funny, this doesn’t look like a mental institution from where I am sitting. Oh silly me, you have an unsubstantiated opinion. Whereas, I speak from experience. See experience verses specualtion.

Too many mind altering drugs on your part?

Here let Ellul explain why. . .

The judicial apparatus is also utilized.(7) Of course, a trial can be an admirable springboard of propaganda for the accused, who can spread his ideas in his defense and exert influence by the ways he suffers his punishment. This holds true in the democracies. But the situation is reversed where a totalitarian state makes propaganda. During a trial there, the judge is forced to demonstrate a lesson for the education of the public: verdicts are educational. And, we know the the importance of confessions in the great show trials (e.g. The Reichstag fire, the Moscow trials of 1936, the Nuremberg trials, and the innumerable trials in the People’s Democracies after 1945). (7) In France, an example is the trial of Jeanson network (September 1960), which aided the propaganda against insubordination and aid to the F.L.N. It is interesting to find this same idea of “education” trails in Goebbel and Soviet jurists. The law itself in the U.S.S.R. is an instrument of propaganda intended to make people like the Soviet order. The tribunal is a means of preaching to the public. Finally, Mao has shown how the army can become a most effective propaganda instrument for those who are in it and for the occupied peoples. The French army tried to do the same in Algeria, but with less success. It is evident that information itself becomes propaganda, or rather wherever propaganda appears, there follows an inextricable confusion between propaganda and information. Amusements, distractions, or games can be instruments of propaganda, as well as films for children (in the U.S.S.R) and the games used in American social group work.

Jaques Ellul, “Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes” (New York: 1973) Page 13-14.

. . . And now let Christ explain it to you:

Luke 12: 11 And when they bring you into the synagogues, and to rulers and authorities, take no thought as to how or what thing you shall answer, or what you shall say. 12 For the Holy Spirit shall teach you in the same hour what you ought to say.

Luke 21: 12 But before all these, they shall lay their hands on you and persecute you , delivering you up to the synagogues and prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for My name’s sake. 13 And it shall return to you for a testimony. 14 Therefore settle it in your hearts not to meditate beforehand what you shall answer. 15 For I will give you a mouth and wisdom which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.

Matthew 10: 16 Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves. Therefore be as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves. 17 But beware of men, for they will deliver you up to the sanhedrins, and they will scourge you in their synagogues. 18 And you shall be brought before governors and kings for My sake, for a testimony against them and the nations. 19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what you shall speak; for it shall be given you in that same hour what you shall speak. 20 For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.

. . . .so what if they keep bringing up judges? That is not the point. Who is in control? Does anyone want you to know you have power? Can a slave be held in chains if he knows he has the power to escape? So if you chose to be a slave that is certainly your right - but don’t complain about the chains.

How ironic, the xenophobe is showing his intolerance to my beliefs. . .which of course have been around since the beginning of time. . . so sad he is so bigoted and filled with hate. . .

James 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. 5 Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy?

John 7: 7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.

John 15:18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. 19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20 Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.

Throwing aspersions at the only person yet in your threads here to take any interest or sympathy in you views is helpful to your cause in what way?

I can find only one case in the American news of an incident of citizen’s arrests against a judge; so unless you provide a news link I will be forced to conclude that you are full of hot air.

well, thank you for proving what I wrote, so kind of you. You really did not have to do that. Although it is a bit off topic.

Funny, your aspersions that I was insane were supposed to be interpreted by me as “terms of endearment?”

So why didn’t you post it? And you can conclude that I am insane after I post the link so it is a “Lose/Lose” situation either way.

Hey the bigot is justifying himself. . . no surprise. . .

Sorry. I did not mean you by “Arresting a judge would get one put into a mental asylum.” Which is why I used “one” and not “you.”

I heard a line like this in a pub about ten years ago from a dwarf with a lazy eye (not joking), “Since I became a reader of lofty books, I have become a defender of lop-sided causes.” The lazy-eyed dwarf said it was from Voltaire, but years of searching have never turned up this line; but that is neither here nor there. It inspired me for the longest time.

wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43347 Me thinks you are not Bo Gritz.
bogritz.jpg

What makes you think I am a man, that is a pretty bigoted assumption. I am not the one all paranoid over an innocent cult or a color then finding little phrases to justify the paranoia. I have no bigotry against Christians in general just the bigoted paranoid ones that wish to harm more than help.

U.S. Constitution: Article 6

You know you can spout your propaganda all you like. . . . the reality is the court is a religious court. . . they are prejudiced to start with since the courts are all kangaroo courts. . . they have arbitrary application of the law. . .they are political courts. . . a sham. . . a joke. . . and you are stupid enough to believe they are about “justice”. . .

DeLay Judge Removed AUSTIN, Texas, Nov. 1, 2005
cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/ … 9627.shtml

AP) The judge in Rep. Tom DeLay’s conspiracy case was removed at the congressman’s request Tuesday because of his donations to Democratic candidates and causes. A new judge will be appointed to preside over the case, a judge who came out of retirement to hear the dispute ruled. The ruling came after a hearing in which attorneys for the former House Republican leader argued that state District Judge Bob Perkins’ political donations called his impartiality into question. Perkins, a Democrat, has contributed to candidates such as John Kerry and the liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org.

“The public perception of Judge Perkins’ activities shows him to be on opposite sides of the political fence than Tom DeLay,” defense attorney Dick DeGuerin told Judge C.W. Duncan, who was called out of retirement to decide the matter. Perkins had declined to withdraw from the case, and prosecutor Rick Reed argued at the hearing that DeLay must prove that a member of the public would have a “reasonable doubt that the judge is impartial” before Perkins could be removed. “Judges are presumed to be impartial,” Reed said.

Judges are elected in Texas and are free to contribute to candidates and political parties. DeGuerin said no one contends Perkins did anything wrong, but “to protect the integrity” of the judicial system, he should not preside over a trial for someone to whom he is opposed politically. The issue has come up for Perkins before. He voluntarily stepped aside in a 1994 case against Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. Perkins had made a $300 contribution to Hutchison’s political opponent. Hutchison, also represented by DeGuerin, was ultimately acquitted of misconduct charges.

DeLay was forced to step down as House majority leader after being charged with funneling corporate campaign contributions to Republican candidates for the Texas Legislature. Texas law forbids the direct use of corporate money for campaigning. Delay’s lawyers cited 34 contributions Perkins has made to Democrats since 2000, including donations to Kerry and to MoveOn.org, a group that has waged a campaign against DeLay. Perkins has said that his contributions to MoveOn.org were made before it launched its anti-DeLay campaign. Prosecutors also argued that six of the contributions were wrongly counted twice by DeLay’s attorneys. DeLay’s attorneys subpoenaed Perkins to testify, but Duncan said he would not have to take the stand. Perkins argued that his participation would threaten the public’s confidence in the judiciary.

A defendant was asked if he wanted a bench trial or a jury trial. ‘Jury trial,’ he replied. Do you understand the difference?’ the judge asked. ‘Sure,’ replied the defendant. ‘That’s where twelve ignorant people decide my fate instead of one.’ Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 124.

How do you save a drowning lawyer? Take your foot off his head. Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 26.

Jury: A collection of people banded together for the purpose of deciding which side has hired the better lawyer. Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 31.

A priest settled into a chair in a lawyer’s office. ‘Is it true,’ said thepries, 'that your firm does not charge members of the clergy? ‘I’m afraid you’re misinformed,’ stated the lawyer. 'People in your profession can look forward to a reward in the next world, but we lawyers have to take ours in this one.
Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 56.

‘You seem to have more than the average share of intelligence for a man of your background,’ sneered the lawyer at a witness on the stand. ‘If I wasn’t under oath, I’d return the compliment,’ replied the witness.
Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 83.

A housewife, an accountant and a lawyer were asked ‘How much is two plus two?’ The housewife replied: ‘Four!’ The accountant said: ‘I think it’s either three or four. Let me run those figures through my spreadsheet one more time.’ The lawyer drew the curtains and asked in a hushed voice, ‘How much do you want it to be?’
Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 90.

A plaintiff lawyer had a jury trial in a very difficult business case. The client who had attended the trial was out of town when the jury came back with its decision. Verdict for the Plaintiff! The lawyer immediately sent a telegram to his client, reading ‘Justice has triumphed!’ The client immediately wired back, ‘Appeal at once!’
Crombie, David, ‘The World’s Stupidest Laws.’ (London: 2005) page 114.

Wow, the only thing in my post was a passage from the U.S. constitution, and from that you managed to attribute 5 different beliefs to me, and spring that into a diatribe about DeLay. You’re fun.

adherents.com/adh_sc.html

Religious Affiliation of All U.S. Supreme Court Justices

First Column: Number of Justices
Second Column: Percentage of all Justices
Third Column: Percentage of Population

Episcopalian 35 32.4% 1.7%
Presbyterian 19 17.6% 2.8%
Catholic 11 10.2% 24.5%
Unitarian 10 9.3% 0.2%
Jewish 7 6.4% 1.5%
Methodist 5 4.6% 8.0%
Baptist 3 2.7% 18.0%
Congregationalist 2 1.9% 0.6%
Disciples of Christ 2 1.9% 0.3%
Lutheran 1 0.9% 5.2%
Quaker 1 0.9% 0.1%
Huguenot 1 0.9%
“Protestant” not further defined 13 12.0% * 9.7%
Not a member of any church 1 0.9%
Total 108 100.0% 74.4%

What’s that? Every one has been Christian or Jewish, with 98.5% being Christian.

Yeah but your broad paint brush includes me. . .

Yeah isn’t it amazing how how garbage people pass of as someone “quotes” or “truth” which turn out to be non-existent - fantasy. . . like “innocent until proven guilty”. . . propaganda. . .

Yeah you are correct. I am not. You should look up a guy called Juan Reynaldo Ochoa. He was charged with aggravated robbery. He admitted to simple robbery but they wouldn’t allow the lower charges. His public pretender said no problem two years probation with simple robbery. The female victim said Juan had stuck knife in her throat, but for some strange reason the husband standing right next to her didn’t see a knife. They threatened 21 years in prison. They later said the would drop the plea to 88 months on one offer and then 36 on another but refuse to drop the aggravated robbery.

Then Juan heard about some “crazy” guy. He believed the “crazy” guy’s “crazy” story. The “crazy” guy taught Juan something “crazy.” Juan did something “crazy”. And then something “crazy” happen. The head Public pretender came the day before the trial, with Juan’s former public pretender and offered they offered him his simple robbery. Which is exactly what the “crazy” guy said would happen. Obviously, the prostituting attorney didn’t want Juan doing something “crazy” during the trial which might crush the simple minded beliefs of the incompetents in the jury or in the audience. The judges and attorneys all laughed at the “crazy”
guy when he first arrested a judge. However, they stopped laughing when the “crazy” guy taught someone else how to do it. They were definitiely were not amused when the “crazy” guy arrested the second judge. That time they didn’t put the “crazy” guy’s picture on the front page of the newspaper .

Why? The “crazy” used the “damning” publicity to his advantage. . . it was his evidence and built up his reputation.