Some reflections on the ethical 'big picture'

The first priority of the normal brain is to survive. Yet we don’t want merely to survive, we want a high quality life, we want to flourish. We want to optimize personal well-being. This is built into our very biology. The question then becomes: How best to do it?

The answer: Let science, the arts, and the other humanities be our guide. Science is a humanistic enterprise; as Polyani has shown it is guided by beauty. Scientists select projects to work on because they find them beautiful, and intriguingly interesting! They love the symmetries they find … the parity, and fractal shapes, the swirls of the nebulii,the elusiveness of the boson, etc. Science won’t explain everything. It never claimed it could. There will thus always remain some Mystery.

If we let science be our guide, the odds are that some marvelous technologies will follow. It has been demonstrated that engineering, and designing, are arts; they are applied science. Every art is either applied science or is employing some science in the creation of the art. [size=85][Maybe story-telling and the oral transmission of folklore is an exception …and there may be others.][/size]

What science would best guide our Ethical life?

Why, a science of Ethics, of course !!! {It doesn’t even have to be named that, as long as it fosters harmony and cooperation, lessens violence, and gross, egregious immorality.}

The universal aim of ethics is to give us a quality life, and a science of The Moral Sense, or a science of effective self-development would be the road to achieving the aim. Such an endeavor is neuro-axiology, otherwise known as Axiogenics. - See: amindforsucces.com – It has trained over ten thousand people - but is aiming for one billion - a critical mass. When enough are trained, a tipping point is reached. The liquid crystallizes; a lynchpin opens. The wold changes for the better as those coached in the new habits are now value-generating individuals. This is achievable. This is why you should pay attention. We ‘lost travelers’ let the science give us a sense of direction. We let it serve as a guide. Each individual then has freer choices, more autonomy, more individuality, more personal liberty. Each is self-regulating and does everything in an effective manner. Each one gets worthwhile things done. Each is caring and people-oriented.

He/she is liberated from corruption, slavery to temptation, greed, gluttony, and other deadly sins. He lives a full, rich life. He celebrates it. He is filled with gratitude and overflows with thanksgiving. His days are filled with beauty, love, and kindness.

As the people at Jean’s Gift Co. have noted:

"Legends say that hummingbirds float free of time,
carrying our hopes for love, joy, and celebration.
The hummingbird’s delicate grace reminds us that life is rich, beauty is everywhere, every personal connection has meaning, and that laughter is life’s greatest creation.
"

.

If you were to reduce ethics and values to their deepest root, what would that be?

Greetings, Dan

Thanks for some good questions :exclamation:

As you know, I have some 197 other posts here at this Forum. You may want to take a look at some of them. Start, perhaps with this one:
http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=182658

Then go to this one: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=182148 which, at the end of the original post, suggests three other threads you should look up.

How? by clicking on the post-author’s name, in this case: thinkdr when it will glow in red. This takes you to a profile page where you click on “User’s posts”. Then scroll down and do the search for those thread titles.

Study especially the 7th paragraph in this one to clarify understanding on the topic of values: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=182204&p=2387918#p2387918 for I believe you somehow got the wrong idea about my using a car as an illustration. That business with the auto is only an example, not a proof of anything. I sensed some confusion on your part. I bring the example up again here and maybe phrase it better. Let me know.

When you talk about “the deepest root” I am not sure what would satisfy you. The first three chapters of Katz - ETHICS A COLLEGE COURSE goes pretty deep but not too many enjoy reading symbolic logic. Maybe you, with your good mind, would immediately grasp how suitable, fitting, and reasonable the argument is. What other philosophical discussion do you know of that pushes it back to the very original assumption? It’s very rare. I push it back to Hartman’s definition of “value” plus the Frankel-Zermelo Theory of Sets. Also discussed is the structure of a “concept.” Every concept has a designator, an intension and an extension.; or, to say it another way: a name, a meaning, and and application. From thaat the Axiom of Value is derived. From the Axiom, plus set theory, the Dimension of Value are defined. They form a spectrum - akin to the Electromagnetic Spectrum (which includes Ultraviolet light, Visible light, and Infra-Red.) In a like manner, the values spectrum includes Systemic Value - which is finite (yet elastic) in meaning; Extrinsic Value (the meaning of which is denumerable (countable); and Intrinsic Value, the meaning of which is uncountable, or nondenumerable. These dimensions serve as tools of analysis, and have many uses.

You may also find that reading ETHICAL EXPLORATIONS, a link to which is located in the signature below, is easier going. Tell me what you think about that essay? Did you ever give the paper, LIVING THE GOOD LIFE a perusal?