¡Somebody DO Something!

I don’t have unlimited time.

Please put meat on this.

For one applicable example, I am (have been for a while) trying to flesh out which kind of distortion/distinction to label all of these, some of which overlap:

cognitive distortions & wholeness
logical fallacies & laws
ego defense mechanisms
resistances to contact
heuristics & algorithms
advertising/abuse/persuasion tactics
coping skills versus overcorrections

Think along with:

  1. ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … n#p2923062
  2. ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 2#p2912122
  3. ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 9#p2881049

Lots of other threads/fields are relevant, but enough bombardment for now.
C4BA5322-05B2-4D71-BFD5-5BF7DBCED91C.jpeg


D8F2894D-9DB3-42B8-9AD4-4E5D74DD53C6.jpeg

I just feel like tossing this one in here for extra.
B84AF372-2B8A-4312-9161-0AC4EB15F988.jpeg

See Harmonic Triads:
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … s#p2921545

Also this:
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 2#p2914292

(1) NOISE distortion/destruction (privation) or
(2) TRUE correct (golden) or
(3) ALIAS overcorrection/reification (excess)

1 & 3 are different senses of nihil. 2 is existentia (esse posse, or however one would word that).

1 & 3 impact reality like food impacts our digestive system, but they are contingent/subsumed in unchanging active existed essence.

Jesus didn’t correct Moses so much as he said that Moses allowed for the fact that humans were not ready for the correct situation. This is true in issues of marriage, divorce, and slavery. The law is not for the correct situation, but corrects an incorrect situation—as far as is possible/doable. Mercy is built in to self=other. Against the correct situation (perfect self=other mercy, and its rainbow of virtues) there is no law. Self=other mercy triumphs over judgment—that’s why the merciless are judged more harshly. They won’t accept true mercy.

It can really be asked “according to what existentially important, constant standard of (change) measure” is this change either a destruction/distortion, a false creation/reification, or a true creation/fractalization, because without that unchanging constant, all change creates/destroys nothing — there is no “way things are supposed to be”. To maintain ideas like creation/destruction (as did Nietzsche) while thinking you’ve surpassed the constant WILL break your mind. It’s like throwing a metaphysical monkey wrench into the gears of your consciousness.

If mind is irreducibly complex (ordered) venn diagram thingy… then order precedes our (contingent mind) grasping it (we have to exist before we can grasp anything, and our existence is irreducibly complex) and we don’t necessarily impose order on reality by the grasping. (Especially not if you take the timeline as a whole…which only Being who exists essence does/is. And such Being does not impose order, but is it.)

Where I am at with this part:
docs.google.com/document/d/18BM … KP2OI/edit

Where I am at with this sheet:
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ … oUNA4/edit

Each needs to integrate and correct the other, as well as being organized and corrected per the OP.

Ishthus,

I KNOW, what that integration is, or think I think I know.

Jumping right in, the various ‘keys’ to the kingdom have or purport not to have a bicameral mind, which can or can not slice it,

That is the doubly edged blade, where of such speeds only a tap , as in a diamond in the rough, to break it in half, and wherein, or from emerges the brilliance the final product can reflect, (and:or the opposite, a black diamond that visually handicaps any and all light.

So, can in either case , or in any case, such duality suggest a prefecture, as if it was a new cut, which may become a shade among 7 shades of grey?

You would , or could say, there really is not much difference, for depending on the distance from the pointillistic points/pockets of observation, all 7 wonders can become as to synthesize , or, they could account for a much wider context of dispersing colors.

Dispersion of an unseen black diamond can not be spoken of, , and can not be conceived, nor can it conceive where no light comes through.

However, the wider all embracing spectrum containing all colors, does appear as white, whereas the minor archaic (archanic) flow can not contain what’s not, or can’t contain it’s self, whereas the all containing one, can contain the minor, black and white continuum.

The integration ‘is’ before the discernment, the ‘differentiation.

At least that is my singular interpretation of what you think.

<><><>

In addition thinking of Leibnitz to and through Shopenhauer’s vanity of existence, the vanity is a pre-tension, a tensive , tensile, pre tended through time, pre tending the ego, coming ‘before time-in a pre- ordinate sequence; whereas Nietzche pretended Other-Wise, that the architecture, the archeological remnants pre determined that vanity by use of functional hubris.
(( Rousseau/)?

At any rate, both entangled, knotted(Laing) into minor-major arcana, contexts, as if the re-flexion came before or after the absorption. ?

At any rate, Nietzche’s pre-tension as is Shopenhauer’s misses the mark of visibility (the visible and the invisible) as the black&white film appeared to preceded color.

But received color comes before black&white, -excepting cats?

Isn’t it funny how “bi” can mean many & “few” can mean three?

Fricken knee slapper!

Maybe it was an intended or not comic relief for the sake of a new trajectory, but not necessarily one of strategy.

Just want to reiterate that you are creepy.

1 Like

In preferably a good way though…

meaning, it’s all karmic…retribution?/recompense??

or, something else ?!?

(bbbbut, whatever could it be?

Got theories for what, but very convoluted here is an outline:

()

Redundancy upwards is enriched toward a need to let the ball drop, o so that everything is lost but one segment of sliced reality, by a thread, enough thou, for someone to recover it and go back into the chaos of containment to find that needle in all but one haystack.

Into the end zone which allows for a time out, to reconsider that strategic move so that the a new direction could be encompassed , but let that sink in for a while and give some measure of assurance, to gain valuable time while other(s) can gain points through more gained distance. (bunch of crap? Not certain yet at least that move upwards has gained time to reconsider, ) for it have been a fateful move, toward the goal line; that is the move away from saturated deconstruction toward maddening reconstruction. MAD, not MADD.

The morphic element.

Morpheus :upside_down_face: the subliminal unconscious manifestation, wherein not Jung and Sartre gaze open the deconstructed phenomenal helpless futility though give respit through illuminated reflection.; shaded by lapse, of memory. and so stimulated to recover a revision of simulated bits that can be recovered reflexively.

But then, getting back to the theme, what can be done other then short cut , rather than develop a simulated version that could process more quickly, by a more convincing simulation that’s prone to accede to revision.

To act as is doing it, by example on basis of modeling, rather than structurally indicating the direct way.