Well, no, not quite that; I meant it then becomes clear (to me) that the question is whether Mozart’s music is objectively good (whatever that means—a parenthesis I already added in my first reply).
I suppose you’re right. In any case, stay tuned.
Well, I disagree. I mean, sure, killing a healthy baby could be good for some (things) but not for others. But good or bad must always be for some (one and/or thing(s)). If it’s good as a means, then the question is "to what end?"; and if it’s good as an end, then the question is “whose end?”
The reason I said the answer must be “I don’t know” is that the question seems to be whether Mozart’s music is good for the whole or the all (what you’ve called “the universe”). And now you seem to be supporting that by pointing to this other thread of yours: