Arguments against the existence of dog

There are people who have dogs

I have seen there are people that hold that the dog is a chihuahua

Others, that it’s a german shepherd

Others, that they have lots of dogs.

There are people that have no dog whatsoever.

Certainly, the true dog cannot be neither of those, because what qualities do they share? Is it an abstraction of four legs, a head, a tail and a cute nose? That seems quite like a man-made idea to me.

People have said that dog is all-loving yet we see dogs bite and kill time and time again.

I therefore conclude: there is no dog

2 Likes

I agree. So-called ‘dogs’ are man-made, designed by humans to exacting specifications depending on what their intended use is.

What are you saying, that dog should be a forbidden subject?

So as not to anger those whose disbelief in it seems to be tied in with some fragile part of their emotional economy?

Can I say “what up, dog?”

To whom it may concern:

The dog form/program has been canceled.

Any evidence of dog is actually evidence of something else completely natural. Probably global warming.

dawwwwwwww

1 Like

He’s arguing the nominalist position, no universals.

Though he keeps referring to

There are no people, because person refers to so many different body types and personalities.

He also uses

which can mean all sorts of things. What is this ‘having’? They are near each other, often. You can have covid. I hear people say my neighbor ‘has’ a dog. But he keeps it outside all the time. I have a dog in my arms but legally it belongs to my sister. The dog has legs. Does that mean I don’t have all of the dog, just the non-leg parts? Wait, it also has a head. I have an idea. Do I have to feed it dogfood. Do I own it? Is it a disease? (sometimes it is, I think).

What’s this ‘man’? What’s this ‘idea’?

Damn Wittgenstein and his family relationships.

People have dogs. You might as well say glympgh clogina fralp. Those categories don’t exist. Gibberish. Have doesn’t even seem to be a verb often, except grammatically.

Wait, ‘verb’. Now ‘I’ ‘have’ ‘added’ ‘to’ ‘the’ ‘muck’.

Oh, my God ‘to’ is a nightmare. Quarter to two. Train to Washington. Talk to me.

I have to eat soon.

claudhnoaposu.

The existence of dog is all a ruse by pet shops in order to sell things to offer to your dog.

Some dog-lovers are saying that you should not use word in vain. I disagree!

We can say the same thing about dog, but it turns out that dog body types and personalities are seen by dog-lovers as mere masks put up by dog in order to exist. With no mask there would be no perception of dog, yet the mask is not the true dog.

… and here we have someone speaking in tongues, a clear sign of a dog-lover. They say it’s channelling what the dog in you wants. It is gibberish and what the dog wants. OH my dog

Haha you in the habit of using words vainly, are you?

1 Like

I see people with make-up and beards. Some have no legs. Many colors. The behavior variation!!!

“If a lion could speak, we could not understand him.” — Ludwig Wittgenstein

That is quite a weird name for a lion

Weird is a subjective term.

Or you just think of death and suffering as a sin against you, while a dog would view it as a requirement for this reality to exist.

There is also the idea that dog needs to be kind to you.
It most certainly doesnt, and it’s kindness is in no shape or form connected to whether or not it exists.

1 Like

…for a lion :lion:

I know, since I have perfected a translator of lion to human. They tell me that weird is subjective but only for them. Dog, on the other hand, is impossible to be translated. It’s impossible to put into words properly what dog means. The profound experience of talking directly to dog can only be described in roundabout ways

I recently said ‘No.’ when my dog started to chew my shoe. He looked sheepish (:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes: ) and left my shoe alone. Might be a coincidence but easy to describe. Of course, one always leaves out details.

1 Like

For some dog-lovers you could be considered a messiah

for many dogs I am a messiah. Jesus produced fish and bread nearly ex nihilo. Not only can I produce treats ex nihilo, I can open doors and with the big metal noisy thing transport them anywhere. I am father and son.

1 Like

What do you have against the existence of dogs man?

:clown_face:

That’s AI. AI dogs are not the real dog, even when AI dogs do answer your every call. That is blasphemous and will not be tolerated in this open minded thread

Dog simply doesn’t exist, there are no proofs nor ever will be. You can only provide AI dogs

Let’s not just assume that stuff dogmatically

1 Like

@pseudoai

No, that’s an actual oil painting long before A.I. ever existed.

:clown_face:

Yes, it is Actual Illustration.

Please do bring forth the actual dog, not a drawing of it nor a particular instance… or is it that dog doesn’t exist?

1 Like

I’m not sure what you are referring to so I can’t say whether they exist or not.