The Collapse of Civilization

Most basically, the left is for equality whereas the right is for stratification. The most basic stratification is between the haves and the have-nots. And the most basic thing to have is precisely the delusion of having something, of being something.—Is it better to be than not to be? Yes, but it’s equally worse.

Pilate: “Why do you not speak, when I hold your life in my hands? How can you stay quiet? I don’t believe you understand!”
Christ: “You have nothing in your hands… Any power you have comes to you from far beyond… Everything is fixed, and you can’t change it!”

It appears that such absolute construction could not have demonstrated the harrowing demonstration of resignation, as if that could raise a unitary path that crosses each with the other, therefore how could such demonstration signal the movement of multiple resignations indicative of many and varied applications in a changing, rather then a changeless world?

The manifold double crosses which can be repeated over, digitally , to produce even countless analogies, born of every pair, the paradox intrinsic between deceit and true heroism?

How can such silence but be a forerunner of other self invalidation, as a warning to those to whom such can only become a period piece? The self starvation of de-constitutive anti imperialism, the de-colonial rise of of democratic principles , the trade off of the horizontal certifies from the vertical axis of depth? Dies not spell the intrinsic punishment in self scourging, as to resemble the thief that appears in the night to steal the being, held in the highest regard for the sake of mere existence? To be can never be counterfeited by the apparent but not existent negation of it, as do darkness in it’self would have a real presence , and not indicate merely an absence of light.

This perpendicular therefore has to naturally extend its self into the artificiality attributed to it.

Therefore to those ultimate critiques the phrase : ‘If God did not exist, He had to be created’ should be rephrased by a recreation. In fact for some god has function of a recreation.

This last phrase indicates an anti-heroic self effacement that has gotten increasing utility.

That Christ probably used this sign, as a form of self validation knowin full its direct perpendicular sign of profundity.

Enough pretty words about weak men. Get to facts old man.

In 1950, a reasonable approximation for the beginning of America’s claim to global hegemony, global per capita GDP was ~$4000, similar to the per capita GDP of sub-saharan Africa today. US per capita GDP in 1950 was below the global average today ~$15k vs ~$17k. I know you don’t care about the Great Satan, so to bring it home: Greece went from ~$3k to ~$25k.

I’m saying that a likely outcome of the collapse of the global order we have now is to return to a world with something like the global order we had prior to this one, and that part of that would be making Greece less materially well-off than Nigeria is today.

And I’m saying that’s a bad thing.

Which part do you disagree with?

I don’t deal in bad or good…and Greece’s plight will follow the fate of her alliance with a dying empire.
All western Europe, in fact, will suffer the fate all vassal nations suffer when the cathedral declines.

America’s GDP was based on exploiting the natural and human resources of other nations…and that’s why currently they are scrambling to find ‘brains’ to replenish what is being lost to miscegenation, dumbing-down, and their immigration shift.
Populations are not replaceable because race is not a social construct, young man.
No matter the mental acrobatics you’ve learned to perform, this doesn’t change reality.
One of the causes of decline is this lie Americanized brainwashed naive perpetual adolescents, like you, do not dare to question.
Weak men create hard times…and hard times are on the way for the US and its empire.
Unfortunately, that incudes me.

When the Empire is powerful, the provinces enjoy the benefits of trickle down wealth… but when the Empire is in decline the first to suffer are the provinces, the vassal states, like western Europe, including Greece.

What’s interesting about Greece, youngster, is that the US didn’t much care about Greece until Turkey started sensing weakness and began to pull away from the Empire.
See Cyprus and how the US supported Turkey’s invasion.
Now that Turkey is beginning to side with BRICS, sensing America’s decline, the US is showing more interest in preserving Greece’s alliance.
The US was double-stadards about nations invading other nations.
Israel is always on the right…because Israel parasitically controls the US.
Not only through its control of US media and Hollywood but they’ve bought America’s congress.
and dumb Americans are only now waking up to this fact…when in the past they dismissed it as another anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.
Now it is becoming so obvious even mid-wits, like you, have difficulty dismissing it.
Difficult mental acrobatics routine you must perform, young man.
See the ethnic Israeli cleansing in Palestine you, and those like you, methodically ignore and justify.
All you know is the holocaust…and those evil Nazis, Hollywood has force-fed you for decades
Are you spineless enough to retain your flexibility?

It may very well that the justifiers of the validity of myths, may be opportunistic, to take the view that the collapse of civilization primarily is due to the Semitic will to power , so that to bind into a circular ring of metafore, that yes, liberals posing as a silent majority, are, really at heart a minority out to control the whole world.

Number one, and no although I do have some Jewish blood, the whole structural edifice of former slaves under Arab slavery and exploitation, not to form a generically linked alliance, and after the fact use it as a deontological ‘facet’ is as misguided as it is to contradict Nietzhe’s real motive, as later to be known , as an existential defensive construct, made to order to stave off an equally a-posteriors construct to avoid extermination?.

Nietzhe’s ethical moral dilemma has the footprints of ambiguity in the desert sand, as much as unsuspecting how doubtfully improper it would become to lay down and dismiss the romantic notion of vanity, and end with charges of ruining young men’s morally justified picture of themselves as holders of purity oh poor young Werher!

No, would they sacrifice their most pure, to instill in the blameless majority this paradoxical double, which by no means can be morally sliced one way or the other with a double edged blade?

Nietzhe merely described poetically the coming of the victimhood of the heroic last man, he did not intend to lay an altar upon which to sacrifice the purveyors of Capital!

The imminent and growing conspiracy may yet be seen as the nakedness of an emperor only children can see.

Phenomenal justifications. as shallow digs’thoughtfully constructed exaggerations, may find faithful fallen followers, to make a real film out of a politically sewn together series of set apart myths, for Hollywood to release as it’s later block buster, albeit neglecting to see the dramatic flair with which Wagner brought to the stage through the cycles of rings, echoing their equally shallow plots down through the ages of de facto slavery.

Bringing political expediency down to the level of deontological truth , consisting of the pleasure to suppress an antithesis of retribution, to mire in the magic of a mystiquelly participated obsession, does not undermine a dialectical necessity!

For those, to him this confusing era that’s playing out presently, that the apparent anthropomorphic duality ( in both senses of the word) tries to cut through all the redundant immateriality, that sustains the thought that Capital just arose out of nowhere, the modern version of it, then it is more factual that is began in medieval Germany, I believe, this whole present scene is obviously spun out as did in a story from Grimm brothers for the same sheeple like children.

The mythic displays factors that perceive some correspondence between Heidegger’s turn, that is attributable with the Viennese grown positive localism, but at the same time, finding primacy between the politics (of experience) and the mythological reduced secondary effects may actually are reversable. This almost ‘magical’ reversibility underlies mythically indebted relationships of the social/psychological varience attributed between the Greek and Roman mythological symbolism, that later were interchanged with those involved between the Byzantine and the Roman versions of post imperial Christian values. (These hypothetical socially determined relationships during the Classical era, extend to modern and post modern postulates toward the growing apprehension manifested between the mythic symbolic formation of identifiable social traits, and those that are involved in the reformation of the modern ego. This process, beyond the secondary, above mentioned, give rise too increasing uncertainty and resultant instability, manifesting near unlimited stress and gloom. For reasons of the above that a direct vertical axis of ‘artificial’ communication naturally has to occur, as a consequence.

‘ How did capitalism originate? ‘Where did capitalism come from?’ argues that although capitalist production made its first fully developed appearance in Britain, key capitalist institutions actually emerged elsewhere in Europe. Indeed, capital, labour, and entrepreneurs moved within a European network. Why did capitalism emerge first in Europe? Independent cities, a multi-state structure, and the Protestant ethic provided a favourable socio-economic environment within which capitalism could develop. The other side of this question is to ask why capitalism did not originate elsewhere. In other advanced civilizations cohesive elites were able to use bureaucratic rather than economic means of scooping off the surplus from producers but in Europe this was not possible after the collapse of the Roman empire.’

Oxford Academic

america collapses… strong possibility of:

russia taking over europe. Now the world is forced to go to church and spread Abrahamism.

china takes over the entire planet and you have no rights.

then (if we’re lucky) a heroic band of american and european made robots restores freedom to the west, but at the price of obedience to the bots.

ive watched a lot of jake tran videos, anybody who’s never watched 1 video doesn’t deserve the right to vote (imo)

and humans seem to behave as troglodytes, in the old testament there were lots of wars. Humans always warring with each other for resources and territory. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is no different and he also uses fake news as propaganda as well. A world where Russia has more power will not be a better world or a different world.

America does do some good too, such as providing a Navy for protecting shipping and trade

what you call America is not really america, its just some international bond 007 villian capitalists controlling everything. Presidential debate is nothing more than a rigged circus idiocracy and “total drama island” for the public. Ukraine is just profits to them. While Israel is suspicious, something odd is that they don’t have any gun rights there. So no defenses against the bots. But maybe the bots are so powerful the guns aren’t of much use.

My personal theory, space aliens, that is my faith. Their modus operandi, keep the humans under control, either through religion or an oppressive state. Canada and Australians have less rights than Americans. America collapses you’ll see more Trudeaus and Kim Juns running wild everywhere. At least America preaches freedom on paper, even if it doesn’t always practice it. No other country seems to even value freedom as a concept

Use of the word Abrahamism noted. Slippin.

Russia doesn’t like missionary work.

You believe in us? We believe in you, too.

Greetings, futureone.

We’ll spare you.

That happened under Obama. Where you been?

can you tell me more about the alien lore? I only know bits and pieces

We come from France.

1 Like

Yes , insecurities are growing and you have nicely put this phenomenon in to the words . But from individual insecurities you have jumped to collapse of Civilization, little too early or in haste . What are the all pervading human insecurities in increasing order they are : food security, financial security, housing issues ( popularly known as Roti, Kapada, Makan in India ). Then comes education, job, job security, political uncertainty and finally religious freedom and national and international conflicts. Yes there are several fault lines on every front I have mentioned . Aspiration from the life, love, determination and resolves push forward the march of civilization. My dear the party has just begun , collapse is far away

The Internal factors you have mentioned are more the forms of experimentation rather than they are here for staying permanently . The popular politics, rise of authoritarian ‘ Right ‘ etc are results of reactions to past only . This also shall be a thing of past soon.

The brevity of an individual lifetime makes it next to impossible to be objective about this. In America, a tradition of optimism has been eclipsed by apocalypticism. There are evangelical Christians, who wish for Armageddon the final battle between good and evil because that will bring back Christ to usher in the kingdom of God. Others see this age as the Kali Yuga—the last age before this cycle of ages starts over. Satyr’s thinking seems to be influenced by the decline of the west by Spengler, a pessimist who applied Goethe’s morphological theory to civilizations—seen as organisms with built in life spans. And the rapidity of change today makes it impossible to predict what life will look like a decade from now. So, again, the claim of ability to read history as if we are looking at it from a God’s eye view is always doubtful, even when the view is one’s own.

1 Like

At this point and proclaiming with others not merely the death knoll of civilization , but those attributes suggesting the demise of all essential foundations, including time, history, and in fact philosophy for it’s own sake, a practice more ontologically oriented than ontic per se.

Social psychology was twisted out of the two reigning paths to an objective world. Jew, that’s archiologically post scribed and freely revised on the way, but it boiled down between the Eastern and the Western traditions , particularly as those opusses that forged the way between Freud and Jung.

That below that mode of deconstruction bode the types and characteristics intrinsic within this yet unformed paradigm, belies tokens of rewards , or punishments that violate rules of aesthetic appreciation.

Goethe yes, appreciates the sadness of Spengler and most Western futurists, who know little of what the Bible tumpers think the originators of religion had in mind, they assume what began to be written , assembled along thousands of years was really the thing.

So religion can be credited to opium, literally in China, and more figuratively in the ‘West.

So who was right ? Freud literally affronted the struggle to ‘Civilisation and it’s discontent’s, after all does not a disappointed lover snap back with a disguised tone, saying: well she was not my type anyway? And when it comes to types, do not Jung’s archetypes aggrandize the momentum and significance of hallucinations of descent into building rationale why Eros, remains a fixed impression in the imagination, the image of which is usually a young, naive, yet beautiful figure, ready to strike the heart against those not believing in the triumph of such simulation over those who rather tear down ancient architecture, and build a new world, out of the rubbish of recollectable useable parts.

Finally what point is there to these desperate attempts to recollect those parts, if the puzzle it’self has lost it’s objective look, the jig may be up some say, it has become an example of busy work, appearing to do something worthwhile.

Try to explain this to young’ones, see how the general decline will affect them, how they will be defaced by them.

The archetypes ofwhat remains of the Holy Roman Empire, the last Holy German Emperror, to have given up on the Greek Ideal remains

Apocalypticism or waiting for doomsday is the common psychology across the globe or countries. This is on metaphysical front , the thought process is mostly according to religious / spiritual teachings one inherits or imbibed on him . There is nothing wrong in such type of thinking as after little bit of initial discomfort or unease these thought later become enjoyable, assuring, stabilizing as they lead towards Salvation or Moksha as per one’s belief . Such fears on normal physical or social front have different connotations depending upon circumstances in which you live.

Waiting for the apocalypse is one thing. Taking active steps to bring it about as another. Jesus is far from the only Messianic claimant and more than a few, have tried to end the age through violence. So far, the many who have claimed the end was coming in their generation or soon after have been wrong. Not a good track record. Of course, they only have to get it right once. Astrophysics tells us there will be an end to life on this planet eventually. But is a prediction that’s been wrong for millennia justifiable as an incentive for salvation or moksha? Fear is the motivating factor. And there’s a long history of men using it to manipulate people for their own gain.

There have been Christian fanatics who have plotted to blow up the mosque on the temple mount in Jerusalem in order to fulfill prophecies so that Jesus can return. So no apocalypticism is not always benign.

Except at critical times, supposing there have been many phenomena that has been ascribed as such, but

This time around, the criticalities zero summed have configured an unprecedented progression of unsettling phenomena, which in sum total have descended to the smallest imaginable particle : The God particle, which are searched for, in neutral Switzerland at similarly phenomenal cost; making this search either an absolute end point into the realms of matter , that matters, or somewhat of an idle yet exorbitant folly.

If, a choice can be made, as it appears it does, it must be made very soon until 2035, says Kurtzwell.

The age of intelligent machines is upon us, not the age of spiritual machines or even conscious ones. AIs simulate consciousness by manipulating language algorithmically. They don’t produce it. And the end of civilization as we know it is not the end of civilization. It’s safe to predict that civilization will become unlike anything we have ever known.

But such have been variously and plentifully been imagined, and prior to such images being filmed-too many to mentioned-some have echoed through the,void!?!

Has 1984 been filed , per se? Let’s see

(Skips to research a film library)

()

Here I found it, will watch whole film, looking for relevant connections with the above

()()

PS: I really didn’t know it was made into a film