The Collapse of Shared Reality in Policy

You even manage to reverse Tolkien’s allegory: the Ring symbolises corrupting, centralized power that seduces through promises of control and unity, not the flawed pursuit of broader freedoms as in liberalism.

In The Lord of the Rings, the One Ring grants dominion over others, twisting even noble intentions into tyranny, like how Boromir seeks it for the “greater good” of Gondor, while Isildur seeks it for his heritage. Sauron forges it to achieve absolute rule, mirroring the kind of unconstrained might that devours the wielder and weakens foes by causing division. The concept of globalism as a ring fits if it centralises unaccountable power (for example, if supranational elites override sovereignty), but attributing this to liberalism is a misrepresentation: liberalism, at its core, resists such rings by diffusing authority via rights, the rule of law, and consent.

Political liberalism emerged in opposition to divine-right kings and empires, Locke versus absolutism, Mill’s harm principle curbing the power of the majority, not as a means of establishing a singular power. Its pitfalls, such as regulatory overreach and cultural homogenisation, arise when it drifts towards statism. However, equating it wholesale to the Ring ignores antagonists such as feudal lords or modern autocrats, who embody raw Sauronism far more directly. The true peril lies in any ideology grasping for power, whether it be nationalist fervour or cosmopolitan bureaucracy.

1 Like

I would say that this problem of breaking through the eternal cycles of suffering is one that is as old as humanity, and taken figuratively, each day we are called to overcome the karmic rebound and find better ways to lead our lives. Who amongst us never had the feeling as children that something unpleasant was always recurring, and it was only when we paid attention to it that we found a way to break through, and that unpleasantness stopped happening?

This repeats itself during our lifetime, and we discover bad habits and even addictive behaviour that we need to overcome to get better outcomes. This is what I interpret the Buddha as saying. It may be easier in a monastic community where we are not continually bombarded with influences trying to win us over to certain behaviours, especially if it sells a product. But lacking a Buddhist sangha, perhaps we can develop a lifestyle that enables introspection and change without austerity. Simplicity seems to be an important aspect, and the eightfold path is essentially a guide to living a cautious, skilful, and anticipatory life.

Right view discerns ads’ illusions; right intention fosters non-grasping choices; right speech counters divisive rhetoric. Simplicity aligns with wu wei echoes from Taoism: fewer possessions mean less distraction, freeing energy for right effort (cultivating wholesomeness) and mindfulness (pausing before impulse). Right livelihood shuns exploitative jobs; right concentration builds resilient focus sans austerity.

Without a formal community, craft one through ritual: daily reflection journals to spot rebounds, walking meditation amid commutes, or “simplicity audits” culling consumerist pulls. Cooperative circles, like Quaker-style meetings, mirror sangha support, fostering accountability without dogma. This prudent life anticipates pitfalls, turning existence into skilful navigation: cautious not from fear, but sagacity, yielding better outcomes as habits realign with harmony.

Therefore, a shared reality requires the participation of as many people as possible, trying to live a principled life and breaking through the self-destructive habits that halt our progress.

2 Likes

Western Liberals are destroying Western nations by mass importing turd-world illegal immigrants, to “win” democratic elections. The reason you do this, is because you can no longer convince the Political Center using reason and logic. You’ve lost the middle, which is why your side needs illegal maneuvers to gain power.

Your side represents Sauron and Saruman flooding the First World with orcs, trolls, and evil men, traitors.

The Hobbits are protected by the Divine Right of Kings (aka. Strider, Aragorn), who has been blocked from the Rites of his crown, by demoralization from the Left (Steward of Gondor). Without the Human King protecting them and the Shire, they will fall easily. Hobbits depend upon “Fascism” and “Authoritarianism” to live, because they cannot defend themselves, and are not in control of their Ignorance / Bliss / Peace.

2 Likes

Oh, have you emerged from the slop again?

There seems to be one influence destroying Western nations, and that is the oligarchy and despotic elite who have found their saviour in Trump, who is single-handedly destroying the rules-based order that the UN tried to implement. Since you are clearly not one of those, you must be a human limpet sucking up to appear to be part of the elite that despise you. Sadly, you are not, and you look pitiful in your pretence.

2 Likes

Simple petulant Ad Homs, thanks for proving my points.

How old are you again, Bobby Boy? And still you’re a novice at Philosophy, at best… pathetic.

1 Like

I think not, but you wouldn’t reply to the following because it’s true.

1 Like

Simpleton,

Trump is mass deporting these turd worlders back to the shit holes they belong. He is leading the Rohirrim pushing your foul army of Sauron back to Mordor… and hopefully you with them.

1 Like

Bro you realize deportation isn’t new right? You ad trump’s name like a fan boy thinking he’s the one who invented it.

Something tells me your just excited to see a bunch of violence being committed. I’m sorry you have a sour black heart but I’m more apologetic that we all have to live in the world with people like you.. please tell me more about how much trump is doing for the country. Have you seen the new hats? “America is back” …. Did you pre order yours along with your T1? Are you excited to get your golden phone? Trump is putting his name on everything maybe you can get a trump tramp stamp… Something tells me you already have one.

turd-world," “orcs/trolls” to describe humans Is textbook dehumanization. You’re morally corrupt.

…. Got trump’s tiny orange dick in your mouth you fucking knob gobbler.

While Aragorn is a king by bloodline, Tolkien’s “Return of the King” is generally seen as the restoration of legitimate, moral authority, not “Fascism.” Aragorn is famous for his humility and service, which is the antithesis of the “Authoritarianism” the post claims the Hobbits need.

In the books, the Hobbits actually “Scour the Shire” themselves. They don’t depend on a Fascist protector to save them from Saruman at the end; they stand up and reclaim their own land.

Denethor (the Steward) wasn’t “demoralized by the Left”—he was driven to despair by looking into a Palantír and seeing Sauron’s overwhelming power. He was an elitist traditionalist, not a symbol of modern liberalism.

1 Like

Yea man. I agree. The realization of The self is in my opinion the key to this. People misunderstand what the self (the “I”) they believe they are is. We take this identifier as solid. Something that has its own eternal foundation. And deserves its own individual rights but more so its desires to be met no matter the cost. I’ve made a post about what I think about existence. To sum that up here I understand the self as agency and nothing more but a “costume” existence is wearing to explore its own being. I believe that what “we” believe to be as reality external to “ourselves” is actually us as one separated into everything thing and no-thing observed through the vantage point of “I.” What I’m saying is like this…. I am Vince but take my body/mind form perception consciousness and awareness away and there’s just being and you and every human experience is that. It’s being in human form… a human being. This is why I’ve said when you can see yourself in others including those you hate you see how ignorance (the self) really works.

In Luke 17:21, Jesus states that the “Kingdom of God” is not an external political entity or a physical place you can point to, but is located “within you”

One of Buddha’s last teachings: Be lamps unto yourselves. Be a refuge unto yourselves. Seek no external refuge. Hold fast to the Truth as a lamp

Realization of the truth of the self is key to understanding first hand these teachings. Once this has been seen by direct experience then the real healing can begin. The loop is real. We are constantly caught in the cycle of reincarnation moment by moment.Authoritarianism the Critic craves is just another “addictive behavior” or “bad habit” used to avoid looking inward.

The only way out is in.

1 Like

You know what I don’t get about people that talk shit about the government and “liberals?”

being able to criticize the government is a fundamental political liberty and a cornerstone of modern democracy. In a liberal society, the government’s legitimacy depends on the consent of the governed, which inherently includes the right to voice dissent and demand accountability.

It is a massive logical contradiction to claim you want to protect a society while simultaneously trying to strip away the very liberties—like the right to dissent—that define that society’s success.

By calling someone a “Liberal” as an insult while living in a Western nation, the trump loving asshat is effectively biting the hand that feeds him.

The ignorance can be seen using the liberty to speak and the liberty to participate in a forum to argue that people shouldn’t have liberties.

If you truly got the “Authoritarianism” you claim to want, your own voice would be the first to be silenced the moment you disagreed with the “True King.” Your beloved papa trump.

Fucking ignorant…

1 Like

@Bob

I know how liberals like to see themselves as global liberators and saviors but ultimately the most insidious kinds of power are the ones that are the most seductive or tantalizing.

I know you liberals will never agree with that.

:clown_face:

Still in the us vs them rhetoric. That’s why you and people like you will never understand the truth of reality. Your to busy looking at everything using a single view. Thank god for the liberal society you live in and detest so much.

1 Like

@Vince

Yes, the liberal society that on one hand speaks of freedom and liberation while on the other condemns its fellow man into poverty, homelessness, or annihilation.

It is that kind of liberal hypocrisy as to why I became a communist in the first place.

Liberal bourgeois making all of these promises and empty hollow platitudes while people were suffering or dying every single day.

:clown_face:

I don’t make any promises. Other than knowing what I’ve experienced is a comfort to me. I’m not afraid to die, be homeless, give unconditionally, support a fellow human especially when they can’t see past their own ignorance and more. You can keep the labels and the emojis I’ll keep doing the work. If your ideology requires you to hate the person standing right in front of you, it’s just another form of the power you claim to despise. Continue being a perfect example to the title of this thread.

1 Like

Yes already another ignorant response. It’s all for the sake of arguing with no real resolution.

1 Like

@Vince

I don’t hate anybody and I don’t think anybody is the lesser or superior, none of that nonsense. More than anything I would like to see world peace and harmony between all people.

I do however believe humanity is very tribalist and that in the west or the United States without taking that into account is a huge mistake.

I also believe white identity is something that is real and cannot be ignored or trivialized.

Rather than have adult conversations about these things the liberals on the forum would rather go around hysterically calling people racists. Those kinds of displays solve nothing ultimately and just further inflame tensions.

:clown_face:

1 Like

You say

That’s hilarious… because that’s not you at all right? You’re the sound mediator and you would never label another person as anything other than a human nor would you critique someone’s rhetoric with a label. Yes you are the adult in the room full of ignorant children. Good for you for identifying the ignorance at hand and it not being owned by you but everyone else.

1 Like

I have no idea who you are talking about. The term “liberal” means nothing anymore.

3 Likes

Oh, wow, BRO, I never thought of that… WOW! You’re SOOOO smart!!

I’m detecting a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome…

You’re projecting here. I am driven by a sense of Justice. Since I’ve witnessed what your side did to Charlie Kirk–I now want the same done to you. Violence for violence. Fire for fire. Blood for blood. That’s the only thing your side understands. You killed the peace keeper and mediator of the American Rightwing …no, you CHEERED his death on. So, yeah, I’m done with any sympathy for your side.

No more emotional manipulations or pretenses… America is entering a second Civil War, and when it comes, I want the traitorous side ANNIHILATED. I don’t want to share a country with a people who revels in death, misery, and fear. I don’t want to share a country with the likes of you.

Retard, Leftists, your side, are the ones who call Monarchy and Aristocracy as “Fascism”. And Aragorn crowned King is the epitome of Authoritarianism. Monarchy = Authority, dipshit.

Read the book dipshit:

AI response:
In J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Return of the King book, yes, the Shire is scoured, but it is primarily by human “ruffians” and collaborators acting under Saruman (acting as “Sharkey”), rather than a direct army of orcs. Although some orcs may have been among the ruffians, the occupation was a, mostly, man-led, industrial, and oppressive takeover, culminating in the Battle of Bywater where the hobbits reclaim their home.

Retard, you proved my point then. Sauron, representing George Soros, or Karl Marx, wielding the power of Mordor is precisely what DEMORALIZED the Steward of Gondor.

Get back to me AFTER you learn to read, ESL dipshit.

I hope ICE deports the rest of your family too.

lol deport the rest if my family where? Back to America? Yea man let me tell you something… your ignorant words are going to end up doing you in. All that talk about violence and hate that filled your mind will blind you from the very thing that comes for you. Don’t worry if shit really got bad here I wouldn’t stay to defend anything or anyone. I did my time for the red white and blue. I’d rather dip and let people like you kill each other and then come back when it’s all done… if I’d ever come back. Good luck bud.

Calls for a Second American Civil War have become a persistent theme among extreme factions aligned with Donald Trump, particularly within the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

These individuals frequently evoke the imagery of 1861, imagining a new conflict that they believe would pit Red states against Blue states in a battle for the nation’s future.

However, their comparison to the first Civil War is historically and structurally flawed. A modern American civil war would not resemble the geographic simplicity of North versus South. Instead, it would be a fragmented, chaotic, and deeply internalized conflict that would devastate communities from within.

The Civil War of 1861 was primarily a conflict between organized state governments. Eleven Southern states seceded from the Union to create the Confederate States of America with a unified military and political leadership.

Battle lines were clearly drawn along state boundaries, and while divided loyalties existed within some regions, the basic conflict remained territorial. The Confederate and Union forces fought pitched battles, occupied territory, and maintained formal governmental structures throughout the war.

In contrast, the political and cultural divisions of 2025 are not cleanly separated by state borders. Every state, no matter how strongly Republican or Democratic, contains significant populations of both pro-Trump and anti-Trump citizens.

Rural areas often trend conservative, while urban centers trend liberal, even within the same state. In many cases, counties are more politically polarized than states. This reality would make a Second American Civil War a far messier and more localized phenomenon, without the neat divisions or state-based allegiances seen in the 19th century.

MAGA and the extreme Right’s fixation on repeating the Civil War ignores these realities. Their vision of clean secession, orderly battle lines, and traditional military glory is a fantasy that fails to account for the granular political geography of the United States today.

Rather than states lining up behind opposing flags, any modern conflict would pit neighbors against each other, fracture law enforcement and military units, and cause widespread humanitarian catastrophe with no clear end.

A Second American Civil War would be shaped by several defining characteristics, none of which resemble the clean break of 1861. Each of these factors would dramatically transform the nature of any internal conflict in the United States.

These include the absence of front lines, localized urban-rural conflict, fragmented allegiances, the prevalence of guerrilla warfare, mass civilian displacement, an intense media and propaganda battle, international interference, and economic collapse.

NO CLEAN FRONT LINES

Modern America is politically interwoven. Red counties and blue cities are often located within the same states, creating a patchwork of political enclaves. For example, Wisconsin, a quintessential swing state, encompasses liberal urban centers like Madison and Milwaukee alongside conservative rural regions. Similarly, even California, often perceived as a liberal bastion, has strongly conservative inland areas. Fighting would not occur across clear state lines but within states, cities, and even neighborhoods. Battles for control would focus on transportation hubs, critical infrastructure, and communications networks rather than traditional territorial conquest.

LOCALIZED URBAN-RURAL CONFLICT WOULD DOMINATE

Urban centers, where anti-Trump sentiment is strongest, would find themselves surrounded by rural areas that overwhelmingly support the criminally convicted autocrat. These tensions would likely erupt into violent confrontations over governance, supply chains, and access to resources. Rural militias could blockade roads leading into cities, while urban governments might attempt to maintain control over critical infrastructure with local police and hastily formed defense units. The result would be a series of localized, overlapping conflicts, each with its own dynamics and players.

ALLEGIANCES WOULD FRAGMENT RAPIDLY

Unlike in 1861, when states formally declared their loyalties, individuals and institutions today would make ad hoc decisions based on personal beliefs, local conditions, and opportunism. Police departments, National Guard units, and even elements of the military could fracture along political lines. Some forces might remain loyal to the Trump regime, while others would resist under state or local authority. Loyalties could shift repeatedly as factions rise and fall, making sustained governance extremely difficult and sowing widespread chaos.

GUERRILLA AND INSURGENCY WARFARE WOULD DOMINATE

Traditional battlefield engagements would be rare. Instead, small, mobile units would engage in sabotage, ambushes, targeted assassinations, and cyberattacks. Infrastructure would become a prime target, including power grids, water supplies, and internet communications. Urban centers would be particularly vulnerable to disruption, while rural areas might see a proliferation of loosely organized militias operating with little oversight or accountability.

MASS CIVILIAN DISPLACEMENT AND A HUMANITARIAN CRISIS

Millions of Americans would become internal refugees, fleeing areas controlled by hostile factions or escaping cities under siege. Interstate highways could become clogged with desperate civilians, overwhelming already strained emergency services. Makeshift refugee camps could spring up around safer zones, straining resources and increasing the risk of disease, malnutrition, and violence. The disruption of food distribution networks would exacerbate these problems, leading to widespread hunger and instability.

You see that last part? That’s me fleeing… you want America and you want a civil war? Have one guy. I’ll be out of here before having to be a part of it… and one more thing… all of you on here with your leftie liberal bullshit don’t realize how many people like me that have served and don’t care to choose a side will be gone. The people that have experience in fighting will leave you to it because people like me who have seen what that shit is first hand don’t want any part of it. I want to live in peace and you obviously don’t so no I won’t be here to fight for a lost cause. When the economy falls apart and the country becomes a war zone and you live in fear of the people like me that did stay because they missed putting bullets in people I’ll be on a beach far away from here or in the mountains again… far away from here remembering you and I’ll laugh a little… because keyboard warriors are huge pussies. You’ll end up holding someone’s pocket just to keep your teeth in your mouth. You’ve already incriminated yourself in this thread hopefully the “left” doesn’t find it and trace your IP.

Enjoy bad bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show bitch I’m going to loudly and proudly.

1 Like