Introduction
The Female intellect would say “Put this topic in Pyschology and Mind”. The Male intellect, being more neutral and less easily agitated, would give it a read, and create connections and say, OK I can see how this can be interpreted to belong in the Philosophy subforum.
Male intellect grasps at what is not there, female intellect grasps at what is already there.
Male instinct is to move, female instinct is to linger. These are proven facts actually, estrogen is put in sleeping pills for this purpose. So, if males are in a room, they will want to explore. Females will soak up ambience, until a stimuli (boredom or neuron depletion) acts upon them causing them to enter the masculine mode and move. Females are not complete and utter retards, females have masculine qualities and males have feminine qualities. Both are useful in certain ways. There is no such thing as good or bad, unless it causes pain, then it is bad. It’s that simple. From there you draw superiority heirarchies in a way to determine which things cause less bad than others.
Differences
Male creative genius draws at what is not there. The masculine is to create something from nothing, the feminine is to remix, rebuild, create something from something. Now noone can truly create something from nothing, all males are female compared to the upper limit of the universe, the Absolute. Males seek for higher and higher truths but once they reach the limit that is all the material they can work with. So, scientists, are still masculine, but feminine in the sense that sometimes they cannot push any further. But science is in of itself boundary pushing, and thus masculine.
Like I said earlier, feminine and masculine are useful. Feminine genius can construct nice things out of rearranging old stock things. While the masculine will be searching for new and bizzarre instruments, trying to compete and push the boundary, the feminine will just be remixing and recycling old stock instruments and putting them together in beautiful arrangement. Therefore dwelling in the feminine is good, but dwelling in the masculine can also be good. Therefore hermaphrodism is good.
Masculinity and femininity is almost absolute fundamentals to the universe. It’s much more than just penis and vag. The desire to push to the boundary happens to be aligned with testosterone, and the desire to soak up ambience is aligned with estrogen. But this is the most probable configuration, because the shape of the vagina must be still, and passive, while the penis enters it. Males are male, because that is how we defined the word. The cosmos is feminine, unconscious, black, dark, Life is masculine, becoming stronger, more alive, more conscious, so it can one day be large enough to have sex with the cosmos. Masculinity and feminity are almost absolute truths, mathematical concepts, even electricity has them. Next time Smears brings up how trivial masculinity and feminity are hit him with this. Masculinity and Femininty are absolutes and like I said we have no ability to go higher than the absolutes, there fore we are all femine compared to the concept of the absolutes. Dwelling on dated topics is very feminine, but if you dwell on absolutes and use that as your data for creation how can that be said to be feminine, except in relation to the absolutes? It is certainly not feminine in relation to each other. And like I said before, feminine and masculine can both be good.
The reason Kelly Jones seems hell-bent on proclaiming the inferiority of feminity is as a reaction and juxposition to feminism. Equal and opposite reaction, force begots force. For every Anita Sarkissian there is a Kelly Jones propped up to defeat her. Seeing a bunch of circle jerking hipsters is infact a harrowing sight. The hipsters think “ooh, im’ so kewl, sexits r DUMB” “sexits are backwater redneck DUMB rasists! SEXICISM IS EVUL!!!”
“I am so kewl cuz I am not a DUMB STOOPID SEXIST!!!” “EVERYONE IS EQUULL…no matter how retarded, we are all the same, no such thing as masculinity or feminite, males n females are all gods creaturrz. all sperm is sacred, all DNA is equal, we are all 1 species, united under 1 flag.”
Now Kelly freaks out when she hears this because all’s she’s thinking, is that the world is going to shit, going to be populated full of Anita Sarkisians and hipsters with 170 IQ’s who are sooo smart because they no rape culture, the evil patriarchy, and battle against sexcisum! They are civilized, any non liberal is a dumb redneck out in the woods. (Except in real life, there are rednecks who do rocket science and make youtube videos about it.)
Now thats not to say females are 100 percent dumb, like Anita Sarkeesian, all of them. Kelly Jones is (presumably) female. But estrogen is kind of a lethargic and cowardly trait. Estrogen chemically causes lethargy (this is a proven fact of science) and fear of new things. Estrogen causes fear of new things because it causes emotional fragility and oversensitivity. Now, fear of new things is not condusive to learning and intelligience. So women are fighting a losing battle, partially because number 1. they have innate desire for rape culture in their DNA and 2. They have innately higher ignorance and lethargy chemicals in their DNA. That’s not to say that femininty doesnt have it’s place. I actually propose a hermaphrodite culture, because, I believe the fight (fight against and mastery of one’s own chemicals) actually makes one stronger. So I do not promote a race of men, but a race of hermaphrodites, as I said before female creative genius has its place, the two complement each other. But on the other hand, a completely femininized race, has a high probability of devolution, on the cosmic scale, which is why people like Kelly and Satyr become concerned.