The Epistemic Communication Dilemma Why Infinite Consequences Require Perfect Communication My Personal Argument

If you’re going to say that I am using a logical fallacy, at least use it correctly haha. I did not create a weak argument to easily attack, which would be a strawman. I asked a rhetorical question and then provided an answer to demonstrate something. This is also not a red herring because I am not bringing up something irrelevant to the conversation to distract from the main point. I am literally still directly addressing space. Look up a definition for fallacies before you use them unless you don’t believe in them because you are so enlightened.

You asking this question when I give the answer on the very next line, demonstrates to me that you cannot engage with an entire argument and that you do not read through all that I say first before responding. So you literally cannot engage with my arguments because you do not respond to them in their entirety. Your question is pointless when it us literally answered in the next sentence. Read the whole post first before responding.

You say this:

How can you claim such a thing when you have already said that you struggle with communication and are learning to communicate better. In what world do you who struggles to communicate somehow understand better what other’s are saying than someone who does not struggle to communicate. I literally have a degree in communication studies, whereas you can not even think abstractly. Your statements are entirely unjustified and you have deluded yourself into thinking otherwise.