Honesty & Openness

[greenfuse]

@anew1

@greenfuse

What a truly irrelevant way to defend using ad homs, condescension, blanket negative judgments of people now, pretend-mindreading, insults and accusations.

If this is what you really want to believe here, then okay

Ah, he who allows hath spoken. The King without a country. The cult leader without a cult. So, his ‘response’ falls to the ground like the proclamations of the Three Christs of Ypisilanti.

We who are blessed with this regal acceptance, feel the appropriate level of gratitude.

@3PEudiamonia

The core objective of these designs is to protect paradigm innovation from being suppressed by conservative forces—a goal that stands independently of the acceptability of the Three Principles themselves. The theoretical tools employed draw upon the principles to provide a normative framework. Even if readers do not yet accept the principles, specific institutional claims such as “argument evaluation over textual provenance” and “protection of paradigm innovation” can still be justified through their internal logic.

@anew1

If you say and believe so, then okay.

@anew1

@Acltalls

I asked a rhetorical question and then provided an answer to demonstrate something.

anew: If this is what you really want to believe is true, then okay.

All three in a 12 hour period of such royal tolerance.