The Epistemic Communication Dilemma Why Infinite Consequences Require Perfect Communication My Personal Argument

How did I use your logical fallacy incorrectly?

Okay. you introduced a ‘red herring’ instead.

If this is what you really want to believe is true, then okay.

Again, if this is what you really want to believe is true here, then okay.

Really?

If yes, then how do you address the question about ‘space’ and how you claim it ‘just ends’, exactly?

Once more, how could ‘space’ ‘just end’ without ‘physical object/s’, exactly?

I could also suggest you look up a few words here, but I will not.

  1. Well, this fits with your preexisting belief ‘perfectly,’ right?

  2. Do you read through all posts before you respond?

It would not matter how many times I showed and proved otherwise, while this one was believing what it is here, it would not be able to recognise and see the actual Truth.

So, this one follows the, ‘Do as i say, not as i do’, advice.

Where and when did I say, “I struggle with communication”, exactly?

Three times you have used the ‘struggle’ word, as though I used it.

Says the one who cannot envision, at all, and does not have the ability, at all, to understand the concept that ‘space’ does not and can not end. Unless, of course, it meets a physical object.

you really do make me laugh sometimes, “acltalls”.

If only you knew “acltalls”. If only you knew.

Is there any possibility at all that it is you who has deluded “yourself” into thinking and/or even believing that ‘my statements’ are ‘entirely unjustified’, and that ‘your statements’ are ‘justified’ and/or ‘entirely justified’?

Or, is this not a possibility in “acltalls” world?