While a single article doesn’t prove Darwinian evolution, here are five examples of scientific journal articles that contribute to the understanding and support of this theory:
: This paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), explores the concept of “design without a designer,” arguing that natural selection, as explained by Darwin, can lead to complex biological structures and adaptations without the need for an intelligent creator.
: This article, also published in PNAS, focuses on the dynamic nature of Darwinian evolution, highlighting the importance of coexistence, environment histories, and the division of labor in understanding biological adaptations.
: This book, cited in a National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) article, explores how Darwinian principles can help us understand the evolution of diseases and the development of medical conditions.
: This book by Paul Ewald, another work cited in the NIH article, examines the evolutionary pressures that shape the spread and adaptation of infectious diseases.
: This article in the journal Origins of Life and Evolution of Biosphere, delves into the origins of life and how Darwin’s ideas influenced the understanding of the transition from non-living matter to the first forms of life.
These articles, while diverse in their focus, all contribute to a deeper understanding of Darwinian evolution and its mechanisms, providing evidence for its validity and relevance in understanding the natural world.
Your so-called counter arguments are nothing but unsupported denial + silliness. Talk about hand waving— what else have you done? And now you’re going to dismiss Christianity? 
Who am I dancing for? Prove you’re not a pseudo muslim sent by the devil to defame Allah’s name. Oh yes and while your at it, produce five peer reviewed scientific journal articles debunking the modern evolutionary synthesis.