I heard someone say we have already entered Dvapara Yuga.
Apparently Kali Yuga is relatively short, and started with Homeros.
1 Like
How did this happen?
The most widely accepted evidence-based paleoanthropological model for how and where humans evolved proposes that Homo sapiens aka modern humans evolved from an earlier species, Homo heidelbergensis in Africa around 300,000 years ago.
1 Like
evidence-based? Please share.
and where did this earlier species originate?
Beyond the 300,000 years.
The very beginning.
The great statue had five parts, each made of different metals. Beginning at the statueâs head, each piece represented world kingdoms in chronological order down to our time.
The head of gold represents the Babylonian Empire, as Daniel told Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 2:37â38).
The chest and arms of silver
The next part of the statue was its chest and arms of silver. They represent the Medo-Persian Empire, which conquered Babylon in 539 B.C. and lasted until 331 B.CâŚ
The waist and thighs of bronze
The bronze waist and thighs in the statue represent Greece (331â168 B.C.), the third kingdom to conquer the Middle East.
The legs of iron
The Roman Empire (168 B.C-A.D 476) was well-deserving of its spot as the fourth kingdom of the statue. Its nickname, the âiron monarchy,â validates Danielâs statement that characterizes Rome âas strong as iron, inasmuch as iron breaks in pieces and shatters everything; and like iron that crushes, that kingdom will break in pieces and crush all the othersâ (Daniel 2:40, NKJV).
The feet of iron and clay
The feet of Nebuchadnezzarâs statue were a strange mixture of iron and clay, representing the modern nations of Europe. Iron and clay donât mix well. And neither would the nations of Europe, which arose from the fragments of Rome and the barbarian tribes of Europeâthe iron and clay.
They would try, though. Many times, different European countries schemed together to build unbreakable bonds, such as through royal intermarriage. Daniel mentions this:
âAs you saw the iron mixed with soft clay, so they will mix with one another in marriage, but they will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with clayâ (Daniel 2:43, ESV).
The stone
The stone was âcut out by no human handâ and shattered the statueâs feet and body, sweeping it away like chaff (Daniel 2:34, ESV)
We seem to believe that mankind is being elevated, that we have become more intelligent, that we have such great scientific capacity and when we look at ancient civilizations we think that they were primitive and that now we have sophisticated environments, yet the Ancients were far more sophisticated than we should ever believe.
The archeology, the history of what they had, the artifacts that they had, shows there is evidence of vastly superior civilizations than we could ever imagine, so are we really improving or are we degenerating? We only have pockets of sophistication on this planet. The vast majority of the people on this planet live in abject poverty in slums in conditions which not only rival but far surpass those of the Middle Ages. Humanity as a whole is degenerating.
Take language for example, Shakespeare used 27,000 words in his literature, but todayâs people speak between three and five thousand words, we just do not have the capacity to understand these words anymore. We have actually deteriorated to the point where the capacity that we had is dwarfed compared to what it was and even more dwarfed compared to what it can become.
The bible says âthe earth wears out like a garment and the inhabitants die like fliesâ,
Your Jewish supremacism sucks and the Bible, especially the Old Testament, but not just the Old Testament, is one of the most savage beastly books ever written, apart from the Talmud, and should be banned and publicly burned. Iâve never said that, and never shall say that, about any other books. Your towering arrogance offends more than the average internet user in that you have literally nothing to offer as security against it. Just rehashing of âWell, Muslims are bad, and l am good, we are good, i have love, so why are they so bad? After all, they are badâ. I find it hard enough to be moral in daily life. How can you possibly be better than me? Ergo your life must surely be filled with horrors unknown to others. Iâm not saying your are BTK, that slot is taken by @Ichthus77 who has the exact same tone and churched social setting as him, more like you are the opportunistic psychopath type, the type that fooled himself into thinking he wasnât one, but then the opportunity just arose and he was EOL anyway so he went and did it. Argue back.
Is this directed at me?
ALL history has elements of myth, and so too does Greek myth.
As the Greeks emerged out of the disruption from the Bronze Age to Iron Age transition the Dark age people lived under the shadow of collossal architecture which they had forgotten who or what made them. These âgiantsâ thought to have build the palaces if Mycenae, such as the Lion Gate were shoulded in mystery. but the notion that the world had been a better place in the past was assumed.
The Homeric Epics also have much historical truths in them and they energed from the oral traditions of the Dark age following the Bronze Age economic colllapse.
Myth is part of history, even in the modern world.
Eg. Of the Boston Tea Party⌠most Americans think that the British were trying to impose a tax on tea: FALSE.
Most Americans think that Lincoln was a friend to blacks and welcomed emancipation. The truth is that emancipation was political expediency and he actually wanted to ship all the black back to Africa.
But try telling that to back people today!
Palaeoanthropology is 10% evidence, 90% speculation.
When I studied it we used the term hominid, not hominin. It was widely understood that the candidates for the thread of evolution that led to homo sapiens was contestable.
Homo erectus, homo habilis heidelbergensis, even neanderthal were all possibles.
GIven the lack of reliable genetic evidence the speculation is mostly about osteology. And so it still is.
We do not have a complete genome for any of our possible ancestors, though what we do have confirms homonid status.
It is my view that the pressure on grant awards forces and over ripe interpretation on human origins.
DO not get me wrong. The basic truth that humans energed from Africa is irrefutatble. Itâs the details that cannot really ever be known since we are talking about dozens of fragmentary examples, Such small sample sizes is great for generalised statements, but the role of Heidleberensis is and should continue to be the source of much debate.
You never know when yet another branch of homonids is dug up.
This is the crime of the century and hopefully things will go back in the right direction so that we can look back on this period with utter shame.
UK, US and EU are complicit in genocide.
One can only imagine the power of zionists working behind the scenes.
I do not hol with conspiracy theories, but seriously, in the US or UK you cannot exercise free speech on this matter without ending up in gaol.
One can understand the overwrought sensitivities in Germany , but the latest news in the UK is that a Quakers meeting was raided by police because 6 women met to talk about the genocide.
1 Like
Suffice it to say I accept the prevailing scientific theory of evolution, known as evolution by natural selection, which posits that species change over time through mechanisms like genetic variation, heritability, and differential survival and reproduction, leading to adaptation and diversification.
I heard about the Quakers incident. Literal Quietists. Itâs hard to be more inoffensive than people sitting in a circle saying nothing.
By the way, my Bible-burning speech was me speaking as a secularist. There can be no criticism of any other religion until it is illegal to be caught in possession of a Bible / Talmud.
My religious side is completely permissive l think. Our Prophet never banned other Abrahamic texts and our holy book the Qurâan forbids attacking other faiths.
Secularism and modern LAW demand the urgent banning of the Bible and Talmud.
Natural selection produces no new genes. Nothing new under the sun. Thatâs basic, basic logic. Evolution depends on novel genes arising. Oddly, Darwin was right at the beginning, that natural selection is a thing. But it doesnât cause new species.
We didnât evolve until after emergence.
Unless you just want to ignore my explanation of the Genesis unfolding of reality, and stick with evolution.
I put these things on here to offer some coherent insights, but your all caught up in your own utterances.
1 Like
Im just a victim of muslim terror and an islamic death sentence. For saying the wrong thing. Your people may be a victim of zionist terror. But I bet you are personally quite safe.
What Jewish supremacy? What in gods name are you blathering about?
I can at least admit that there is zionist terror. You cant even believe a muslim would talk to a girl the wrong way (even though there are plenty of muslims online that defend fucking 13 year olds because they have their periods) let alone that there is muslim terror. All muslims are innocent. Yes sure, a very innocent faith. No violent or oppressive habits at all. All muslims are saints, and to deny this makes me a psychopath.
Very typical brainwashing symptoms. Youâre so afraid to look in the mirror itâs surreal. And yet⌠typical.
Plebius Sealionus Maximus Walru When a muslim slaughtered a dutch filmmaker (lies! lies! no muslim has ever slaughtered anyone! oh wait he admitted it and is proud of it)
I made this film.
That is how tolerant I was of your religion, that is what a psychopath I am.
Will we ever see a muslim show similar generosity and open heart to another creed?
1 Like
What ⌠? You steamed into that thread, which got trashed because it was predicated on bogus storytelling and trolling (from what l can tell) and reflected badly on the site. You steamed in declaring it to be 100% true when it was evidently 100% fake and the troll that made it could not tell a straight lie and she dissolved into goo under the spotlight.
In the same instant you declared me to be a crafty representative of an evil religion, when we hadnât even spoken before.
Then, you declared that the Palestine massacres were kind of justified because the locals didnât protest enough (to your liking) against their government (as if you can just protest against Hamas and not be killed - they are an evil force imposed on the helpless Palestinians and you can research Haaretz - even Haaretz - to find out who financed them with tens of billions of dollars). This is callous and a telltale sign of psychopathy Imagine someone telling you the Jews had the Holocaust coming because they didnât speak out against Zionists riling up the Fuhrer in the 1930s. There is zero justificiation.
Then, no irony, you began declaring love as your reason to live on another thread l was responding to, regarding a proposed debate l wanted.
Then you began attacking Islam again over some obscure conclusion drawn from some obscure tract by Al Ghazali. I too think Islamic civilisation took a wrong turn with Ghazali but l nonetheless would be unfit to shake the manâs hand. You have no concept of the ideas around him, you just have to post against Islam somehow, the moment it is mentioned.
Therefore l would be jusified in pointing out:
My further point being that this is the correct Secular and modern Lawful reaction to the Bible and Talmud. You doubtless are secular too, and Atheist. So you should be more concerned that the Bible and Talmud are still legal to own.
I would further say, and did further say, that to even begin criticising another faith, you need to first exhaustively trash the Bible and Talmud, which are the archetypes of nasty literature.
I would further say, and did further say, that as a Muslim - the religion you clearly despise above all else because it triggers your evil nature - as a Muslim, l would have to leave the Bible and Talmud in peace as my religion forbids the mockery and banning of other faiths and specifically enjoins Muslims to tolerate the meanness of Christians and Jews. Howâs that for an evil religion?
Also, please donât tell me itâs wrinkles you want. If you and guys like you, were so repulsed by the pre-industrial practice of marrying young, rather than solo acts - all civilisations married young before the industrial revolution - if you are so repulsed at this, then what about people eating faeces? Yep thatâs prescribed as a medicine in the Talmud and also some liberated fetishists do it in modern society. Why donât you turn all fiery and hateful over that? Answer: BECAUSE YOU DONâT WANT TO EAT FAECES SO YOU DONâT CARE. As for these younger females that suppposedly repulse you, you are over-concerned with that. I put it to you itâs because if you could only get your hands on one, if only ⌠then you would leave nothing but dental records.
This is not the insult it seems. It is a portrait of the Islamophobic hypocrite mindset. I see this a lot. You manifest all the tropes. Holler back but make it worth while.
I have extensively thrashed the Bible on this site long before you were a member. It is safe to do so because no one will come and kill me. Not so with your book.
â'I put it to you itâs because if you could only get your hands on one, if only ⌠then you would leave nothing but dental records.â
This shows what you are, at heart. You are truly, a deeply monstrous man.
Okay.
@Plebius Sealionus Maximus Walrus
You might make some sensible points here and there, and you write well, but this thing about dental records⌠the fact that the image of that kind of interaction with a female occurs to you at all, that it exists in your mind â that betrays something about you that is so vile, so far more dangerous than anything I could have suspected about you before â you project this demonic nature on people that dislike/ feel threatened by your religion, but it is clearly your own shadow.
âget your hands onââŚ
Christ.
All that is far beyond incel pain. The level of frustration and alienation from women communicated is other-worldly.