For those in the U.K. , the Guardian is today focusing on a new issue it has created: ‘nutrition recession’. The problem they are trying to outline is that food prices are rising in a way that makes eating junk food much cheaper than eating fresh, healthy food. As a result, they argue, the poor are ending up malnourished.
guardian.co.uk/society/2012/ … -austerity
I have no doubt about their conclusion. Many hard up families in Britain have terrible diets, and I’m sure people in other western countries have noticed the same thing. But their reasoning is all faulty. Although their is an abundance of cheap, unhealthy food, this isn’t the real cause of the problem. The real cause of the problem is a mixture of lack of education, an unhelpful food culture and, dare I say it, laziness.
Lets starts with the second point there: an unhelpful food culture. TV chefs are everywhere in the UK, they are now among our top celebrities. TV shows have, for the last 8 years or so, taken over a large proportion of prime time TV. But the message they often send out is that ‘good’ food is all organic, complicated recipes which are vastly expensive to cook. People seem fixated on the need to cook something completely different every night, a habit which rises the cost of cooking considerably. The use of vast arrays of herbs and spices, cupboard ingredients, meat and vegetables are encouraged. All of this makes cooking look like its something for only rich people. As an example, look at this list of ingredients for a stew from a recipe on - wait for it - the Guardian food website itself:
The assembly of all these ingredients would cost more than I commonly spend on cooking every week.
Lack of education? It’s simple - people don’t know how to cook simple, easy and cheap dishes. In many countries, people commonly learn to cook from their family - passing on a tradition of family based cooking which is economically prudent. In most Western countries, however, people are increasingly looking to mass media as a source of cooking education. This may be great if you want to be the next masterchef, but at its heart it lacks the prudence of traditional family cooking.
And then there’s laziness, which I honestly think is a factor. By laziness I don’t entirely mean the lack of will to spend time cooking (although that’s part of it), I also mean the lack of self discipline necessary to keep to eating food which is healthy, but not quite as tasty. A little pork stir fried with whatever veg is cheapest at the market with a large serving of rice takes little time to prepare and is perfectly good to eat. It’s also dirt cheap, as long as you go easy on the meat. The thing is, a lot of people simply don’t want to eat this kind of thing every night. They only want to eat high fat foods with lots of salt, because its easier and tastier.
When ‘healthy eating’ is billed as meaning eating on fresh leaf salads with feta cheese and black olives drizzled in extra virgin, no wonder everyone thinks they can’t afford to eat healthily. As an ESL teacher, I have visited the houses of many immigrants into both the UK and Australia who eat large, healthy meals on food budgets which are probably far less than the average hard-up British family’s diet of frozen fast food. The guardian has this one completely wrong: its got nothing to do with prices and everything to do with attitude and approach.