Lol! If you believe rocks know stuff, the joke is clearly on you!
I’m sorry, could you explain to me again how believing that rocks have spirits is any less ridiculous than something a Christian might believe?
Silhouette
June 21, 2020, 10:15pm
384
Ecmandu:
Silhouettes argument is that a perfect being must have a perfect argument for its existence (100%)…
That’s a really damning argument. God is not some human fucking court John. It’s god you’re talking about!
Silhouette never said this but implied it: if anyone disagrees with your argument, then you (declaring yourself god or gods bitch), proves your argument false that god has such a perfect argument for gods existence that no being in existence could or could want to disagree.
That’s Silhouette’s argument. Perfect. More perfect than your sky fairy!
And then there are my arguments!
That’s only one of my many arguments so far, and it’s not even that good because it only proves John has fallen short of an argument worthy of this “God” he’s presenting, defining, and failing to prove. It does nothing to say he can’t offer the many flawed arguments that he’s supplied. He can do that all day, they’re just not worthy of the God that he’s professing - they’re only worthy of “some human fucking court” as you say, which is apparently admissible to his standards even if it isn’t admissible to “His” standards.
I covered way better arguments than this that detail his fallacies and disprove God 100%, which he won’t even dare address. He literally just avoids and evades - it’s standard internet behaviour. There’s a thread on this forum about the purpose of this forum, and clearly for some it’s just a place to unaccountably vent all your frustrations and deny anything that gets in your way. I picked up the bad faith behind John’s arguments pages ago. He wants to define “omnipotent” like Brian Fantana in the movie “Anchorman” when he boasts about his cologne “Sex Panther” that “60% of the time it works every time”, which just means “omnipotent” can mean anything you want that’s less than 100%, so long as it’s 100% of some proportion that’s less than 100%.
I dunno if that’s “too verbose” as you seem to find me, but it’s clear to me that this guy is a waste of time.
Rocks don’t have brains to think. Cut one in half and look for yourself.
Silhouette:
Ecmandu:
Silhouettes argument is that a perfect being must have a perfect argument for its existence (100%)…
That’s a really damning argument. God is not some human fucking court John. It’s god you’re talking about!
Silhouette never said this but implied it: if anyone disagrees with your argument, then you (declaring yourself god or gods bitch), proves your argument false that god has such a perfect argument for gods existence that no being in existence could or could want to disagree.
That’s Silhouette’s argument. Perfect. More perfect than your sky fairy!
And then there are my arguments!
That’s only one of my many arguments so far, and it’s not even that good because it only proves John has fallen short of an argument worthy of this “God” he’s presenting, defining, and failing to prove. It does nothing to say he can’t offer the many flawed arguments that he’s supplied. He can do that all day, they’re just not worthy of the God that he’s professing - they’re only worthy of “some human fucking court” as you say, which is apparently admissible to his standards even if it isn’t admissible to “His” standards.
I covered way better arguments than this that detail his fallacies and disprove God 100%, which he won’t even dare address. He literally just avoids and evades - it’s standard internet behaviour. There’s a thread on this forum about the purpose of this forum, and clearly for some it’s just a place to unaccountably vent all your frustrations and deny anything that gets in your way. I picked up the bad faith behind John’s arguments pages ago. He wants to define “omnipotent” like Brian Fantana in the movie “Anchorman” when he boasts about his cologne “Sex Panther” that “60% of the time it works every time”, which just means “omnipotent” can mean anything you want that’s less than 100%, so long as it’s 100% of some proportion that’s less than 100%.
I dunno if that’s “too verbose” as you seem to find me, but it’s clear to me that this guy is a waste of time.
You didn’t address my argument.
Ecmandu
June 21, 2020, 10:23pm
387
A Christian believes that having everyone’s consent being violated for ever is the work of a good god. A rock spirit, ( compared to that ) is a joke.
Shamans use rock spirits all the time in sweat lodges to bring out the spirit of the rock. This is an extended discussion, but factually true.
It’s not even remotely as unbelievable as a god who is good who violates the consent of every being forever.!
Are you allowed to step on rocks? Is a rock autopsy possible or bad form? Do rocks die? How do you know if a rock is dead?
Lol!
Tell this one it doesn’t have a brain. I triple dog dare you.
Ecmandu
June 21, 2020, 10:29pm
390
John, you believe in god as the supreme being because that’s what you’d want to be if you were god.
You’re doing simple projection! You’re a dictator at heart.
John, every rock cut in half has a new spirit. The universe is much stranger than “god-did-it” and much more mysterious. You not only have a false argument, you have the laziest argument. You quit thinking. You gave up.
Silhouette
June 21, 2020, 10:30pm
392
Aside from the fact that addressing your arguments is all I’ve been doing, you’ve not addressed my arguments.
We’re done here.
Ecmandu
June 21, 2020, 10:34pm
393
Silhouette:
Ecmandu:
Silhouettes argument is that a perfect being must have a perfect argument for its existence (100%)…
That’s a really damning argument. God is not some human fucking court John. It’s god you’re talking about!
Silhouette never said this but implied it: if anyone disagrees with your argument, then you (declaring yourself god or gods bitch), proves your argument false that god has such a perfect argument for gods existence that no being in existence could or could want to disagree.
That’s Silhouette’s argument. Perfect. More perfect than your sky fairy!
And then there are my arguments!
That’s only one of my many arguments so far, and it’s not even that good because it only proves John has fallen short of an argument worthy of this “God” he’s presenting, defining, and failing to prove. It does nothing to say he can’t offer the many flawed arguments that he’s supplied. He can do that all day, they’re just not worthy of the God that he’s professing - they’re only worthy of “some human fucking court” as you say, which is apparently admissible to his standards even if it isn’t admissible to “His” standards.
I covered way better arguments than this that detail his fallacies and disprove God 100%, which he won’t even dare address. He literally just avoids and evades - it’s standard internet behaviour. There’s a thread on this forum about the purpose of this forum, and clearly for some it’s just a place to unaccountably vent all your frustrations and deny anything that gets in your way. I picked up the bad faith behind John’s arguments pages ago. He wants to define “omnipotent” like Brian Fantana in the movie “Anchorman” when he boasts about his cologne “Sex Panther” that “60% of the time it works every time”, which just means “omnipotent” can mean anything you want that’s less than 100%, so long as it’s 100% of some proportion that’s less than 100%.
I dunno if that’s “too verbose” as you seem to find me, but it’s clear to me that this guy is a waste of time.
Your pedantic nature gets in the way of conciseness …
This post was perfectly concise.
Ecmandu
June 21, 2020, 10:41pm
394
JohnJBannan:
Lol!
John dude, the joke is on you. Rocks are sentient beings.
I know deep down that hurts you, it’s too much for you to know right now. Rocks suffer tremendously. That’s not a joke.
Rocks are not sentient. Rocks do not have brains.
Ecmandu
June 21, 2020, 10:51pm
397
Jelly fish don’t even have a detectable neuro-system (no brains, no spinal cords) but they still react!
Here’s the deal John, your understanding of existence relative to me is extremely small.
Everything is spirit!
This is only a dictatorship if you want it to be! Life is so much greater than that John!
iambiguous
June 21, 2020, 10:52pm
398
youtu.be/HpPghmWhY-g
Why two of them? Well, God works in mysterious ways.
Or, if you count this…
youtu.be/JKlSVNxLB-A
Three of them.
Ecmandu:
Jelly fish don’t even have a detectable neuro-system (no brains, no spinal cords) but they still react!
Here’s the deal John, your understanding of existence relative to me is extremely small.
Everything is spirit!
This is only a dictatorship if you want it to be! Life is so much greater than that John!
I guess you have rocks in your head?
Ecmandu
June 21, 2020, 11:35pm
400
Do I have you in my head? Do you have me in your head? But you think god has everyone in his head! That speaks everything about what you’d do with god powers if you were hypothetically “god”.
John, as this thread goes on you become more desperate.
