blue: process/event ontology is like duty theory (deontology) (conduct)
yellow: object-oriented ontology is like virtue theory (character) (I would not confuse that with virtue epistemology just yet)
red: value ontology is like teleology (or consequentialism if you don’t understand goals/purpose precede existing them in action…for beings subject to time)
***
Before you can truly/authentically say your unseen and inaccessible-to-others character is of a certain quality, you have to demonstrate it *consistently* in your actions (and by that it is not meant by rote habit, religiously, like a Sunday morning church pew zombie going through motions without vibing with the meaning… unless you want to be de-programmed… or mistaken for camouflage).
Sometimes you gotta break character to build character.
***
I have been listening to the “partially examined life” podcast regarding Graham Harman’s object oriented ontology.
I purchased that book they were discussing, as well as his newest one. I think I’m gonna be geeking out on that for a while.