I see the point. The triad, ontologically dialectically derived, has changed the cut off parts, of what has appeared to be an analytical problem; and it became understood as analogical, but not before, it was turned into a harmonic triad. The harmony does have a calculated-mathematical basis, and it presents an elemental self description of an identifiable synthetic pre-ontological negative trace to the Greek sourced formally described dialectical anagram? I don’t know even if I can use that word, but it jumps out at me.
As functional analysis is later a more descriptive way to represent dialectical synthesis, the triads and the gaps between it’s trig. features approach a return to an analogous state, as if, informing it’s ‘prior’ state of it’s change .
Feels much like a conscious state’s efforts to recreate an ‘unconscious’ simulation in retrospect, as if in line with the produced construction of certain refined structural phenomena, out of the basic uncertainty below.
So there is no real contradiction to what You are implying, in terms of this process because it appears as one shadows the other.
Just musing but it’s late…and not to bore You.
The dialectic between material and spirit, is developing less contrasting features with which to be able to perceive the start contrast between foreground and background, with the object changing relative meaning , between a transcending Vanishing or an enhancing signifier.
That this calculus of sense-sensation begets the notion that the epiphenominal perception of a political dialectic caused, a vacuum of significance, indicates the shadow world, with which the spiritual, cross, of the former grounded dialectic is similarly in relationship with.
This is why, I feel Your comment not grounded sufficiently, and offers merely an anti-thethic commentary to the underlying harmonic calculus.
All the quoted sources indicate mere searches to some material supporting the issue.(s)
Just in case. Searching for the safety is easier said then done.
