*****Updated:
The Limits of Analysis
1. There is what occurs; there is occurence; “there is”: occurence
2. The analysis of what occurs is dependent upon the occurence.
3. The analysis occurs of what occurs.
4. Both the analysis and the occurrence form a relationship that occurs.
5. There is nested occurence, the analysis proceeds as that which derives further occurrences from what occurs.
6. The analysis (F:) derives occurrence in accords to context applied, thus derivation of one occurrence to another (Z1 → Z2) is within the context applied by the analysis (A), F: A(Z1 → Z2).
7. The change of context results in differences of derivation F: B(Z1 → Z1.1).
8. The derived occurrences in turn are subject to further analysis.
9. To apply context, through analysis, is to determined what is and is not derived; context shapes the derived outcome.
10. Analysis is the reduction of one emergence into another by means of context, this reduction is derived by the limits of the context itself.
11. Analyzed occurrences are but the expression of context, reduction is but the limits of the context itself where what occurs has occurrences within the occurrence removed.
12. There is no law as to what context is or is not applied; what remains as the context, by all means, is equivalent to an emergence of definition.
13. The limits of the analysis is the limits of context, analysis is reduction in accordance to context.
14. This is an analysis of analysis, to analyze analysis is to apply context to it; the context of the analysis is the analysis itself.
15. Analysis is an occurrence, to analyze is to reduce an occurrence, to reduce analysis is to observe the fundamental occurrence of what an analysis is and is not.
16. What an analysis is is an occurrence, what it is not is another occurrence, what is it and its another is subject to occurrence.
17. The same nature of what is analyzed, occurrence, is the same nature as the analysis itself, occurence.
18. Occurrence is reduced to occurrence by means of itself thus what is is transformation; analysis is reduced to that which it reduces thus analysis is transformation.
19. Analysis is the transformation of occurrence, to reduce one occurrence to another is but to transform occurrence; analysis is process of occurence reduction by pattern context; analysis is a patterned process
20. The reduction of an occurrence to another effectively inverts what the occurrence is reduced to to a general state by which what is reduced occurs under the specific context, ie what occurs occurs if what it is reduced to occurs, what is the reduced occurrence exists if what it is reduced from occurs;
F: A(Z1 → Z2) results in:
F: (A(Z1 ↔ Z2) ↔ A(Z1 ← Z2)).
21. The reduced occurrence results in what is reduced; context is a rationalized set of occurrences within it: F: A(Z1, Z2).
22. To analyze is to result in the context as a set or container of occurrences; this set is an occurrence.
23. The analysis of analysis is but a self contained set by degree of becoming self embedded: F: A(A1, A2)
24. Analysis becomes self-embedding occurrences, with each occurrence being the relative context for another analysis:
F: A(A1,A2) →
(A1(A1.1 → A1.2), A2 (A2.1 → A2.2))
25. There is only the self-embedding of occurrence as the limits of analysis, self embedding is the limit thus analysis does not derive truth or falsity, as these are distinctions subject to being occurrences, but rather patterns as the set of occurrences themselves self.
26. To analysize occurence itself would requires the occurence of both context and the analysis itself thus resulting in the same self-embedding but from a different degree in accordance to the context.
27. Analysis is function in accordance to context with context deriving further context thus analysis is embedded within itself, a function within a function, in these respects the function becomes a linearly expressed sequence of fractal like functions and the simplified pattern is that of a fixed point scale invariant function:
F: A(F: A1(A1.1->A1.2)-> F: A2(A2.1->A2.2))