No. (1.) I would not go so far and speak of a “split”, and (2.) there was not only an English or, as you say, an Anglo empirism but also a German or, as you say, a Continental empirism. The Berliner Kreis (Berlinese Circle, a.k.a. Berliner Gesellschaft für empirische Philosophie) and the Wiener Kreis (Vienese Circle) founded the Neupositivismus (Neopositivism), also known as Logischer Empirismus (Logical Empirism).
The term “immediately findable total content” means that the total content of the spiritual and emotional experience can be immediately found and, for example, communicated to others. Not all content is always present. Forgotten content, for example, is not present anymore, and some parts of the forgotten content come back sometimes, … and so on.
I did not say “is found” but “can be found” or “is immediately findable”, namely by the owner of the consciousness, philosophically said: by the subject. This is important, because the owner of the consciousness does not always immediately find the spiritual and emotional content.
Biologically and especially neurologically said, the consciousness is part of the brain.
The conscious parts of the brain can be found in the reason brain (light blue => 4), in the emotion brain (red => 3), and in the Kleinhirn (cerebellum [pink => 2]).
But because of the fact that we are talking about this more philosophically, we have to talk about the owner of the consciousness: the subject.
“The owner” and “the soul” are pretty much the same terms and don’t really tell us much of anything. Are you certain that the consciousness is not “the owner”? If not, who/what is “the owner”? Precisely what is it that is potentially finding that emotional content? What is it doing when not finding it?
One can also say that the consciousness itself is the owner - it depends on the so-called “point of view”. This was the exact reason why I opened a thread dealing with a “superconsciousness”. Do you remember?
A thought, the vast memory of the soul has no emotional context due to a conflict with the soul’s primary function to process emotions, the pinnacle of experiences.
What if emotions are the source of consciousness? What type of being or machine could convert an emotion into an electric energy signal?
Stop derailing this thread, Maniacal. Personal attacks are not needed here. And if you really want to be in the mood for your own shenanigans, then do it in another thread - not in my thread.