The Mechanics of Creativity, Insight, Genius, Revelation; Human Ingenuity as Conceptual Shuffling
The standard argument or assertion of a sect, be it religious/philosophical/political/etc. is by degree a recursive engine by degree of cycles, shuffling, using assumed disparate texts/concepts that have common denominators among themselves, as repeating, variables to create a new text/concept.
At a practical, or empirical, level
In the observer there is a series of disparate texts/concepts in mind and memory.
This series contains the common denominator of the observer which acts as a fixed point from which the text/concepts emerge and dissolve.
Each text/concept contains a distinction that mirrors another text/concept containing a similar distinction.
This repetition of distinctions, across disparate texts/concepts, is a cycle or recursion by degree of said repetition where the repetitive distinctions effectively are a symmetry amidst what is assumed as disparate.
A new text/concept occurs via the overlapping distinctions that close disparency of multiple texts/concepts by degree of the repeated distinction contained within disparate texts/concepts. In synonymous terms the repeated distinctions act as a unifier or bridge between what is rather contrasting by degree of otherwise assymetry.
Creativity, insight, revelation, etc are thus results of a mechanical nature where the fundamental operation is synthesis via the acknowledgement of recursion of meta-distinctions within otherwise assymetric distinctions.
This can be observed, in part, as:
T1 contains X
T2 contains X
Therefore T1 and T2 are connected as T(1,2)
The process repeats at several levels resulting in
T(1,2) T(3,4) T(5,6)
Where each contains Y
So now you have
TY((T(1,2) T(3,4) T(5,6))
And the process goes on indefinitely as a self-layering cycle.
Average consensus may call this creativity/insight/genius/revelation, but effectively is is repeated distinctions, cycles, that overlap to create new distinctions as new cycles where the repetition of meta-distinctions amidst assymetrically oriented ones reveals a synthesis in observation, by the emergence of the pattern, but effectively was always present from another dimension of perception.
Thus what remains is the observer as a focal point observing the resulting synthesis with the synthesis being a collapse of disparate distinctions by degree of the unity of meta-distinctions they contain. Synthesis thus is the act of observation and requires recursion of meta-distinctions, and underlying cycle that becomes present within observation.
In these respects creativity/insight/genius/revelation
are byproducts of recursion of common distinctions where disparate distinctions are revealed as but scales as the meta-distinction is a relative fixed point that scales itself across various expression.