If you’ve been banned (from online philosophy forums) for your Opinions, then you will empathize with this man and regard him as a fellow political Dissident…! @apaosha especially
1 Like
2 Likes
I’ve listened to a few of his podcasts recently, they’re alright, but as usual you republicans and conservatives never distance yourselves away from economic capitalism. That is why ultimately I cannot commit to either taking them seriously.
[That and because I find Christianity severely lacking.]
eyeroll
Capitalism did not come from Jesus. The only time he ever talked about things like he was a capitalist was about the eternal treasure — and it ain’t money or real estate or anything else capitalists find valuable, unless they are the sort that keeps greed in check and makes sure every person who contributes to society as far as they are able …is able to thrive in it. But most capitalists call that socialism. The only time they like throwing the people’s resources at actual people is when those people are already wealthy. Or for a tax write off. Or to distract them from the fact that Epstein didn’t kill himself.
Ohhh you got me started.
1 Like
Imagine every time some greedy person said “oh you just want an imaginary utopia, you need to think more practically, I appreciate your passion” … the reasonable people responded, “oh you just want a practical dystopia, you need to think more compassionately, I appreciate your accountability.”
1 Like
I prefer Capitalism because it mimics Competition. Communist/Marxist economies are anti-competition of the Individual. Thus they almost always fail (except in stringently Homogeneous societies like East Asia).
The failure of Capitalism, however, is Monopolization and Corporatism, Corporations being yet another form of sub-societies. Societies within Societies. I’m not opposed to some socialism within Corporations. Because at least they give a purpose to their workers.
1 Like
Correct, Jesus was very much not a capitalist and he wasn’t a Zionist either. He referred to Israelis as lost sheep.
1 Like
yes. No competition is boring and also leads to inferior slop products. I told Mr. A this before.
The failure of Capitalism, however, is Monopolization and Corporatism
Even good ol fashioned capitalism, without corporate monopoly, still is incompatible with modernization, technology, global trade, and overpopulation.
1 Like
Banned from an online platform? Sweetheart, Nick’s a great guy but he’s small fish. You’re asking a life time registered sex offender if he can sympathize with someone who gets kicked off a MySpace site.
1 Like
The ideal of communism is national cooperation of all society with people working together.
There’s still a system of merit or competition in that certain jobs and occupations require a certain level of education.
The difference at least in my system of communism is that there are no homeless people and nobody goes hungry. In my system access to higher education or on the job training is provided for everybody along with healthcare. Nobody has to go without government assistance, it is always there for people of a national government that cares about its citizens.
We eliminate the type of inequalities you see in capitalist economies.
.
I’ve never heard anyone spout so much waffle as that guy..
.
..the blonde’s cute, though. 
2 Likes
That’s not true at all. Indie Games are destroying the so-called “Triple-A” Gaming industry, because goy-slop games are trash and can’t compete now with studios comprising just a few game developers that work for beans.
1 Like
When you get your credit card taken away by the Banks, let me know… I’ll give your Marxism a listen to for the hundred and one-th time.
It’s one thing to go to jail. It’s another to have all the banks in the country shut their doors to you.
1 Like
I think you read what I said wrong. I said NO COMPETION = BORING.
And you read it as “no, competition is boring”.
Anyway, both Indie and AAA are trash. AAA is trash because it uses Unreal 5 graphics which look like uncanny valley garbage and has TAA garbage also. Gamers also seem to mix up the purpose of Gaming and VR. The purpose of gaming is Art, not Photorealism. Photorealism is geared toward VR applications. If Gamers were about the VR then VR would be more popular, but they are about Gaming but do not understand what Gaming is supposed to be about. Gaming is not about Photorealism. When you look at board games, do you see a bunch of Photorealism?
Also, Unreal5 isn’t even photorealistic and has a bunch of garbage screen-space effects that cause temporal incoherence.
Indie games are garbage also, and its a lot of garbage indie spam and asset flips or “baby’s first game” type games. I was browsing for games on Black Friday and there was simply too games, its market oversaturation. Even an AI or ASI would be overwhelmed by the amount of games, its provable because even AI will get some information wrong or missing some data about it because the amount of games is incomprehensibly vast. And the market is oversaturated because of overpopulation of 8 billion and Globalism where you are bombarded with every country in the world’s games trying to compete with every other country. The very concept of “International Patent” is absurd which leads to Japanese companies patent-spamming people and trying to ruin the industry and creativity, and Japanese are the greediest race. The very truth that Western business must abide by aggressive Japanese patents is an absurdity.
Gamers, generally speaking are deranged degenerates because they only care about ‘graphics graphics graphics’ and maybe some audio, dulling their senses and warping their minds, prioritizing value to the most masculine senses and very little to their feminine faculties, very little resources given and very few teams assigned to touch and haptics R&D or olfactory technologies.
1 Like