The distinction of void is the paradox by which all distinctions occur.
Discuss.
1 Like
Only in the mind. What is void?
Going to need more context.
void is nothingness, and distinction is when you say ânotâ so are you saying like nothing making itself nothing is the paradox that creates everything with nots?
The point of awareness as void and the void of one thing as the absence of anotherâŚare they the same void?
If there is the recursion of absence, ie a void as the absence of a thing, is that a context?
1 Like
Is void a distinction by being distinct from something?
Sometimes it is possible to get trapped in language.
Try focusing on the meaning and reality behind words, what is meant to be referred to by language.
When discussing nothingness very few times is there an actual void, much of the time it is human beings talking about things they donât understand. An unknown thatâs categorized as an empty void of nothingness.
We have all these different words or relations describing unknowns because a lack of certainty frightens us.
2 Likes
Looks like an IQ problem?
1 Like
Isnât just about everything?
1 Like
Is using language to say âlanguage is a trapâ is a trap of language?
If uncertainty frightens people, and they are certain that this uncertainty is frightening then why are they so certain about uncertainty being frightening?
Is the distinction of âthe unknownâ unknown if it is a distinction?
1 Like
I honestly, and I am saying this with absolute sincerity, cannot even imagine being that dumb.
There is no voidâŚvoid is a human construct.
What it refers to is existence where the human senses lack the acuity to perceiveâŚthat which lacks an energy pattern to convert into an abstraction called âthing.â.
So, no-thingness.
All is energyâŚmeaning there is no state that is void of energy.
That which lacks patterns or where energies are too subtle to be percived by human senses, the brain interprets as black, or empty, or âŚvoid.
In fact, there is no absolute zero temperatureâŚevery part of existence has a measurable temperatureâŚ
Sometimes they call ti background radiationâŚsometimes dark matterâŚ
The concept of a static, indivisible singularity - not a black hole - or the concept of a emptiness, void, is fabricated by inverting experienced existence.
Brains can do thatâŚergo brains are Platonic caves where Ideals existâŚ
1 Like
the three impossible nihilisms
saying *source* of being (rather than Being) makes it a fourth thing (the nothing)âbut it *does* make sense to say the necessary source of contingent being
saying the source of meaning (rather than Logos) makes it a fourth thing (the nothing)âbut it *does* make sense to say the necessary source of contingent meaning
saying the source of action (rather than Spirit) makes it a fourth thing (the nothing)âbut it *does* make sense to say the necessary source of contingent action
The resolution is panentheism, is it not?
Necessity is where the work is done, the work is Action, necessity is rest mass, everything outside is in relation with/to everything else that has rest mass. All of it happens within the source of contingent being which is necessary being. None of it would happen without Logos (the meaningful reason why).
well, nothing would be distinct from something right? like the opposite of it.
nothing is distinct from something is like saying something hasnât got a distinction,
if something hasnât got a distinction, then wouldnât that be like saying it isnât different to itself, meaning it is the same as itself
Xcjsjfncjczjsjnnn
It can be an opposite but for the sake of precision:
To assert ânothingnessâ is to assert a distinction as nothingness is distinct from something while being distinct as ânothingnessâ itself.
In shorter terms: ânothingnessâ is subject to being a distinction.
To assert âpure nothingnessâ is to assert a distinction thus âpure nothingnessâ is a distinction that arises as a paradox as âpure nothingnessâ cannot be distinct as there is nothing to be distinct within it, accurately worded there is not even an âitâ with pure nothingness.
The distinction of âpure nothingnessâ is a paradox by which distinction arises as it becomes it opposite by the presence of distinction and in these terms the original distinction of all distinctions, ie pure nothingness, originate distinction as paradoxical by nature as the inverse of pure nothingness is the presence of pure distinction, as pure somethingness.
In these respects pure somethingness, arises as the distinction of pure nothingness where the pure nothing is effectively the potential for a distinction of itself to observe. Because its potential is pure distinction, by default pure distinction must emerge. The distinction of pure nothingness is distinction as pure emergent process conducive to pure somethingness.
Relative nothingness is less paradoxical, in this respect, as a relative nothingness is a relative absence of a thing, where another thing is present, thus is a relative distinction by default.
If something is indistinct, that indistinction is distinct from distinction thus is a distinction within distinction as the limits by which distinction arise. A distinction distinct from distinction is a distinction contrasting against itself thus containing its opposite as embedded.
To be more precise, the distinction distinct from distinction is indistinction and this indistinction is embedded within distinction distinct from itself as the indistinction thus distinction self-contrasts so to be distinct as distinction.
This is a spiral and fractal affect . You will want to read this post a minimum of four times to start to grasp it.
1 Like