The Paradox of Void (Discussion)

the three impossible nihilisms

saying *source* of being (rather than Being) makes it a fourth thing (the nothing)—but it *does* make sense to say the necessary source of contingent being

saying the source of meaning (rather than Logos) makes it a fourth thing (the nothing)—but it *does* make sense to say the necessary source of contingent meaning

saying the source of action (rather than Spirit) makes it a fourth thing (the nothing)—but it *does* make sense to say the necessary source of contingent action

The resolution is panentheism, is it not?

Necessity is where the work is done, the work is Action, necessity is rest mass, everything outside is in relation with/to everything else that has rest mass. All of it happens within the source of contingent being which is necessary being. None of it would happen without Logos (the meaningful reason why).