Well, in all honesty, it seems you are somewhat preoccupied with projecting this image [here in ILP] as a sophisticated, worldly dude…the one who gets all the hot chicks [bitches?] because there is just a sort of swagger about you they can’t resist. But why would someone find it necessary to do this if, on some level, it was not a defense mechanism of some sort.
I figured at first you were just being ironic. Playing the part in order to expose the immaturity of those who really do think of women as, well, hos or chicks or bitches.
Besides, the bouncing boobs…that’s just Kid stuff, right?
Iambig, I’m not portraying a character. I’m here talking about what I did today, and what I think of different issues that are discussed on the boards here. I don’t know why success is always met with the canned criticism or “must be a defense mechanism” or “must be coping for something”. I don’t know how or why you choose to see me as you do, but it’s your prerogative to do so. I don’t think people would consider me to be particularly sophisticated. I do have a great deal of luck in several things that are a part of my day to day life. I don’t know what else to tell you.
Then again, scoring highly on a small part of a person’s character. If a person is ‘intelligent’, it does not mean that he is trustworthy, diligent, careful, skillful, cooperative, etc.
And statistics only identify trends. The attractive individual, who you are looking at, may be a complete moron.
Okay, fine. You stick to your version and I’ll stick to mine. All I can do [if you are not being ironic] is to read what you post and react to it. But since I can only react to it from within the parameters of my dilemma [as dasein], it can only reflect my particular political prejudices.
But [alas] they are anything but “simple” I can assure you.
The article says 'hostile attitude towards women and/or objectification of women'. Consider that what counts as a hostile attitude towards women and what counts as objectifaction is a just whatever suits the political ends of whatever feminist happens to be man-hating from one moment to the next, I don't see how this study could possibly demonstrate anything. It's not as though they are saying women who prefer large breasts are more likely to beat their wives or rape women- they're simply saying these group is more likely to express opinions and attitudes feminists don't like.
I’m not sure this has anything to do with women. What we have here is all about the reaction to what is seen as less about the object being seen.
The GIF is about how easily a man can be mesmerised by the contemplation of the usually unseen parts of a woman that are mostly revealed in the lead up to a sexual encounter.
But the reaction is variable. At a moment of sexual repleteness, the image is absurd and ridiculous; at a moment when the libido has a need to be satisfied the image takes on a new meaning.
It’s only ever about the observer. The observed in this case is anonymous now clothed and has no interest or connection with the curated and infinitely reproduced object, she has moved on.
Women aren’t nearly as self-conscious about their vaginas as men are about their penises.
Hence the “whatever”…
You’d have better luck making fun of her moskito bite titties.
Rather the reverse. Women who, when objectified, are rejected as undesirable objects, fear objectification, and resist it by appealing to morality and ‘inner beauty’ – though it seems to me that inner beauty would never deny the value of outer beauty.
Girls with pretty bodies often don’t seem to mind being objectified in this day and age.
They do no longer scorn nature or her gifts.