Clothing was invented for two purposes: 1) to hide human sexual genitalia and 2) to protect the human body from cold weather.
Even in the oldest tribes and cultures on the planet, the Hadzabe tribe in Africa, among others, every human society on the planet dons clothing to hide their “ass-ets”? Why is that? There is no reason for them to do this considering that clothing is not needed by them to maintain their body heat. The rest of their body is naked and deals with insects and disease, so why are the genitals covered?
It’s rather simple. Because my statements are true and people cannot respond to them reasonably, this purpose of clothing comes down to cock-size. Yes, it’s all about cock-size yet again. The reason that cock-size needs to be hidden is to hide the dominant traits of specific men over other men, the less-endowed. If clothing were not regulated into every human society, then there would be non-stop inter-violence in tribes and groups of men. The largest cocks would attract all the women naturally and the other men would rebel violently to cull women to them. As long as the largest cock is exposed, then there shall be male-violence until all cocks are severed or hidden.
This is the reason why clothing was invented by the human specie, before written-recorded history and before clothing was used to protect the body against the elements.
That theory is completely illogical. Clothing isn’t inherently useful for any said purpose, and has been used for countless things.
Large thing-a-ma-jigs are a turn off for me, medium is preferable. That’s ridiculous. Why would I want to be jabbed by a montrous intrusion and stretched open to a gaping hole?
Places in Africa are far from the American’s idea of status and beauty. Tell an African woman that men find breasts attractive and she will laugh hysterically, I’ve seen it. They tend to celebrate their sexuality in unison with the tribe as one rather than compete with them. Silly American douches are about greed, and know nothing of fertility and its depth.
You just used to stand in the locker room and challenge your buddies after a football game.
Actually, no, I don’t know what the hell you are implying. Regardless, the point of this matter is, out of sight, out of mind. The human mentality is so base on average, so stupid, comparable to the intellect of a mite, that clothing the human genitalia is enough to make them forget about their natural lusts. Clothing is primarily used, and was originally invented, to hide the sexual desires of men and women from men and women. This device became a necessity to tribal societies as infighting was naturally dramatic. How could men and women live with one another without extreme competition for sexual rights out of a group of 12-100 people??? The only way to progress past this infighting was to control the conceptual process of human individuals.
Clothing hid their cocks and cunts, out of sight, out of mind. We can work together now.
Just don’t remember that it’s all about sex otherwise you’re fucked.
Freud might have said it was, and admittedly it’s the strongest of all survival skills, but this still doesn’t account for your fallacy.
You cannot say that clothing on the genitalia is specifically, and only for the purpose of suppressing sexual activity. For the number of tribes that do; there are a number that don’t. Aside from even this, where you go wrong is setting intrinsic value to loin cloths. It doesn’t follow no matter how many tribes you can speculate add such a value to it.
You can’t say it’s primary, that’s adding your own subjective value.
3 examples? I’ve seen the footage on National Geographic!! I don’t look up any fucking tribes to know this shit.
“You can’t say it’s primary, that’s adding your own subjective value.”
“Clothing was invented for two purposes: 1) to hide human sexual genitalia and 2) to protect the human body from cold weather.”
There, I said it. It’s primary, nice attempt to put words into my mouth though.
“3 examples? I’ve seen the footage on National Geographic!! I don’t look up any fucking tribes to know this shit.”
Congratulations, your knowledge of ancient human tribes based on National Geographic is complete!!! That’s right, you don’t need to look up anything in order to know shit. Is that all you know?
So you’re saying visual footage of real African tribes completely nude are imaginary and unreliable to proof that African tribes do not all cover their genitalia?
Case and point.
Actually, I have yet to see a tribe completely buck-naked from head-to-toe with no adornments on their skin whatsoever. I am talking about animal-naked here, nothing at all. I have yet to see a tribe with men who do not wear these:
“Brought up in an environment of Victorian and puritanical notions, they condemned these entrancing figures of Egyptian history because they discovered that not only the Pharaoh and his wife but also their children and officials went around with too few clothes (transparent at that!) or no clothes at all, that they practiced nudity in the royal palace, in the royal gardens and swimming pool, that they loved physical beauty, valued good food and wine, and led a frankly joyful existence.”
Look, I’m tired of being taken off-topic of my points around here…
If anybody wants to provide for counter-information to my assertion, that clothing was invented for the purpose of covering human genitalia due to sexual socialization, then make your claims or do not speak. There is nothing else to be said. I’ve already said it all. The rest is circumstantial clarification.
Take my points or leave them.
P.S. If you can’t define “nude”, then don’t respond.
I know that the burden of proof is on me to prove my points and assertions. I believe that I have done what is needed for now. To say that my points aren’t circumstantial, or to imply otherwise, like what Echo has done, is ludicrous. Everything is circumstantial. Everything is relative. I never stated otherwise.
So far, nobody has offered me a good counterpoint to defend myself against. What is nude?
Does anybody, other than me, even know? I am doubting the fact…
Nude means someone is not wearing any article of clothing made of some kind of cloth, animal skin, or vegetable matter.
Nude means that the human body is completely uncovered and is presented in all of its glory.
That said, if everything comes down to penis size, why do women cover their genitals? Couldn’t the women still go nude and it not go against your clothing for cock-size theory?
Men needed to cover their cocks in order to prevent male-violence through infighting.
Women needed to cover their cunts in order to prevent male-desire from spiking randomly.
Essentially, when the genitals are uncovered, and naked, then they beckon the natural urges of competition between male and female animals. This is why they become inflamed in differing mammalian species when females begin ovulating. If this occurred in early human societies, in ancient cultures and tribes of people, then sexual violence would be out of control. Methods were needed and eventually became developed to disrupt and redirect these sexual desires through sexual repression. Women couldn’t expose their vaginas just like men couldn’t expose their penises. These social tactics made social cohesion possible and allowed for new forms of human social interaction, based on ancient civilization models. There were lead men and lead women, based on a hierarchy of strength and power. The wisest were at the top and the weaker were at the bottom. All of this was after clothing as invented and developed.
For the idiots who cannot comprehend this fact, Echo, nudity is complete nakedness, your birthday-suit. It means no piercings, no tattoos, no paintings, no penis sheaths, nothing at all. I have never seen or heard of a tribe of human people who go about completely naked, and since this fact is so blatantly apparent, nobody is going to provide me with a disproof that should be relatively easy to expose. No human tribe on Earth, right now, socializes a hierarchy or any kind of society without some form of clothing.