The Rise of the Democratic Police State

Love and caring also encompass the ability to say no. Support and love don’t mean they get what they want. In your example, the world was stupid to believe that because Hitler said, “Aohh, just give me Czechoslovakia, because it was ours in the first place, and I’ll go play with it for awhile” doesn’t mean you do it. If your child can sucker you that easy, then its not really being supportive. You also have to support both sides. Not just the one talking. Your kid walks up and says, “Give me 10 bucks and I’ll never ask for any more money”, are you gonna believe that? Probably not.

My utopian ideas aren’t going to happen tomorrow (although wouldn’t it be cool). We’ve got a long way to go, but we have to aim at it if we’re ever going to see it. Love and support can also be found in discipline, as such things become necessary occasionally. We do have to “enforce the peace” every once in a while, but not the way we do now. And hopefully we won’t need to go through the violence we do now to attempt this. It doesn’t mean no rules, you just have to know what the rules are.

What I meant by that is that as long as humans have been around there has always been a belligerant warlord or somekind of dictator to persuade other people into believing that they wont commit another atrocitity and five minutes later he’s signing the order to continue his plans. And this usually works because 90% of politicians are easly dooped into the lie or don’t have the back-bone to enforce what they have just agreed to.

Really if you think about you could know all the rules in the world but that doesn’t matter; what does matter is wether or not you respect or abide by the rules. I mean I could recite to you every law you could think of but it doesn’t mean crap if I dont follow them.

The funny thing about this thread is that it begins from the starting proposition that there has been a state other than a “police state”.

I would submit that every state relies on policing and maintaining discipline with force and threat when indoctrination, coercion and bribery fail.

What alters is that when a population becomes accustomed to a certain level of policing it becomes comfortable with it, it fades into the background and each individual lives in the supposition that he is at liberty to say and do as he likes, when he cannot. Then the level is heightened, either due to internal strife and a growing dissidence or due to an external threat and a growing competition or, usually, both simultaneously since one effects the other.

Then the heightened security measurers focus the mind of every citizen on the ever present Big Brother and he mistakenly believes this is a nascent policing state when it is simply a previous normality raised into consciousness.

When flying in an airplane, for example, the ear is first made uncomfortable and then grows accustomed to the background noise of the engines.
If this noise is suddenly made louder it perceives this alteration in comparison to the previous environment as being noisy, when it was noisy all along.

I’m getting the idea that the thread is about nations that police other nations not nations that police themselves.

“how can humanity become whole”, that i think is the single most significant question that’s addressed here. unfortunately myself has a pretty gloomy solution to that issue, which i tragecally reckon as the sole solution - interbreeding en mass. sorry if this insight struck you all a bit, but i really don’t see another way. you want homosapiens unite? you’ll gona have to unite all the gene pools - see? literally speaking, interbreeding is still the way

Funny you should mention that. Visited this yet?
ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/vi … p?t=145364
Personally, I’m hoping that mass interbreeding wouldn’t be necessary, but I do see the rationale there. It’s unfortunate that human beings are constantly seeking to outdo, take advantage of, and manipulate each other in horrible ways.

Mixing all the races of the world doesn’t matter because lets face it there can be a black person who acts as white as the whitest white person and vice versa. what I’m getting at is that race doesn’t matter what does matter is culture, which will never happen for one main reason which is.
there are so many beliefs that contradict each other and are rooted so deeply that no will budge an inch on there beliefs to conform into a super society. Examples of contradictary pairs.
1-Christians and Muslims
2-an oil tycoon and a tree hugging hippie named Flower
3-a Historian and people who are trying to erase the past, some people are trying to say the Holaucost never happened.
4-Israelis and Palistianians

that’s why we can’t rely on cultures to mix all by themselves, muslim won’t just come up to christians and say hey pal, let’s write a korabible and pray together. we need more tigher woods kind of guys, we need more americans, not white type of americans but the darker types

This idea of mixing up our blood really isn’t very practical. It’s not a real solution. We, human beings are attracted to who we are attracted to. It’s not so much culture as it is tribal. We have affinities with certain people and - ah it’s a complex reason - we move in certain circles. I have demonstrated this time and again. I travel a lot, I have lived in quite a few places in my life. It seems at this stage that the people that I encounter, my ‘network’ are all from the same ‘tribe’. People that I’ve gathered from my whole life. I have a core group of friends. These friends seem to move in and out of the two main countries that I do. Friends of friends, someone I have met in say Thailand who knows someone that I know from Japan. Six degrees of separation. Increasingly I meet people that I swear I have met before. (There are a million and one reasons for this - not least reincarnation and karma).

No we can’t say from now on we will mix up cultures. No, the real issue is not making us all the same but recognising that we ARE already the same!

There is nothing wrong with each of us as we are. A flower doesn’t want to be a tree, yet a flower and a tree live in harmony together, each fulfilling their individual role. An oak tree doesn’t want to be a palm tree, but they can live side by side in perfect harmony.

There is something inherent in all human beings which makes us the same! PEACE IS NOT A DECISION, IT’S A REALISATION!

So, how do we go about realising our inherent sameness?

A

but what i said all along is that the only practical way to unite humans completely is to unite what’s fundamental - the physical - the genes. plenty of educated people realise that the biological diference measured in terms of geno variation is less than 0.1% for all ethic groups. but that scientific fact has no importance in society. what’s significant to people is how they look, what they wear, how they talk, how they behave, their belief, their culture… talking about “uniting humanity” is talking about this issue on the broadest level, and what matters most at this level is cultural difference. now we are back to the essence of the previous couple of posts:

so basically what i’m saying is that as long as culture is what seperates us, the only practical way to eliminate the culture difference is to mix the genes up, thereby in a broad sense “unite all people”. of course this takes great time, but america is THE example, especially between the white americans, as we don’t hear similar clashes like european cultural clashes happen over there - because white americans are really, really mixed up
[/quote]

Becoming whole again… It will happen the day we accept each other as ourselves. When there are no others, just us. It is an internal realization, not an external methodology, not interbreeding, not reaching out, but reaching within…

JT

[.quote]Wow, I am so sorry! Were your relatives reimbursed the small pittance allowed.
[/quote]
Solution??? Who is the enemy? Who is the one who will poison our water, our food or set-off a dirty bomb? Are they easily i.d.'d? Atta was legally here and looked very western. So what do we do?

Fight Fear, yes, I am not afraid and not willing to go down the appeasement road as it does not work. Again, we were attacked and suffered the greatest loss from an foreign power, and I do blame the many despots in the Middle-East, since PH. Ideas, solutions? Remember, I do not agree with appeasement.

How about other governments educating their own instead of brainwashing them?

Sorry, but I am cynical and do not believe that a solution is possible without total pacification. Read the Middle-Eastern polls, read the violence, and racism they promote. You are included as a U.S. citizen.

:sunglasses: FYI: Most scientists agree that there are not races. There are different cultures.

Carrying body and soul and embracing the one, can you avoid separation?
Attending fully and becoming supple, can you be as a newborn babe?
Washing and cleansing the primal vision, can you be without stain?
Loving all men and ruling the country, can you be without cleverness?
Opening and closing the gates of heaven, can you play the role of woman?
Understanding and being open to all things, are you able to do nothing?
Giving birth and nourishing, bearing but not possessing, working yet not taking credit, leading yet not dominating, this is the Primal Virtue.

  • Tao Te Ching, Chapter 10

A

There is no easy solution. I wish there was. I have thought for a long time trying to think of something. We face a much larger problem here. We face hatred based on skin color, religious denominations, and politics. Lifestyles and cultures. We have to examine why the differences in these things make so much difference. I don’t have an easy answer. But, I believe that we must look for a long term solution to the problem. The band-aid theory hasn’t served us well in the past, and history is there for us to learn from . Experiences build the future.

Appeasement, no. We don’t give them what they want. But, we don’t do the same thing to them either. Hate breeds hate. They commited a foul act against us. One I do not condone. But, if we do it to them, we’re playing by their rules. We’ve gone to schoolyard level of dealing with problems. We must treat the cause not the symptom. Like I said, not an easy solution. But, we must educate people that these are no reasons to kill other people. Both our side and theirs. We treat the rest of the world with a certain amount of disdain, this much is true. Other countries don’t get a chance to talk to all of us and know how many Americans disagree with what’s being portrayed by us. We are not separate from them. This is the key difference. We are all part of the human race and should treat each other like it.

If this could be done, it might have already. I agree that there must be some responsibility there, but America doesn’t portray the image that we do this either. We as a nation may say we promote equality and fairness in the world, but we don’t walk the walk to match the talk. We are all to blame for the things that happen. It’s a long hard solution, which I don’t foresee happening like that, but its a goal. Do I believe it’ll happen in my lifetime, most likely not. But again, its something we should strike for.

They believe what they believe in part due to us. I may be a US citizen, but we are all world citizens. We have a long way to go. We cannot even treat animals, trees and other parts of the planet like they are a part of this planet, how do we expect to treat other people like it too? It’s a problem we must start facing now, so that down the line we actually can do it. Again, there is no easy solution. We can’t give into them, but we must not retaliate in such a way as to keep that sentiment that they have now going. The cycle must be broken. We all need to band together or this will never work.

Chuckle, do you realize that it is allowed to lie to one’s enemy in Islam? Many Muslims will say, "Oh, this must means if some asks you if you enjoy the dinner they served, you say yes even though you hated it. But the quote is to lie to one’s enemy.

Do you really expect the terrorists to be disciplined like unruly children. Do you really believe you can be rational with them. If we play by the rules, they will use our rules to destroy us, and they have often made this claim.

Addendum for Skydaemon: the only thing people must do is die. Also, most people do not want to be considered brethren to terrorists or people living in mud hut who stone others to death and vice versa with our cleanliness and our lethal injections.

I doubt if humanity will ever be a whole anytime soon. We are better now than 50 years ago, a 100 years ago, but we have a long road ahead of us.

Nope, read too much, have seen too much and know better. Utopian ideals which leads many sheep to the slaughter.

Chuckle, so we sit back and take it on the chops. The only reason we went through WWII is because Germans did not believe they were totally defeated. It was only after WWII and total pacification that they are now more peaceful. Ditto for Japan. Terrorists honor strength, and the victors is battles, not spineless negotiators.

But many Middle-Eastern government and religious leaders do

This is the only response they will respect. They make be starving, living in rags, but they will have an expensive daggar and rifle. You probably do not even own a gun and are not starving.

Okay, I’ll play, what is the sympton? U.S. supporting Israel, our ally. I have far more respect for Israel than any other nation in the Middle-East. And please to not throw the race card. The Middle-East expelled far more Jews in the early 1950’s than Israel expelled Arabs. Israel allows free worship, most of the Middle-East does not, especially Saudi Arabia. Any of those practising another faith have to pay taxes.

You talk, but provide no solutions.

We have a right to kill any possible threats.

You really believe that they want to be part of the human race and abide by other’s laws. No, all must submit to Sharia Law according to terrorists.
Geez, do you even read what they claim? I doubt it. Read MEMRI, and I can provide many other sites as well.

They behead unarmed civilians and you want to rationalize with these animals.

Only because of our pressure and the fact the Middle-Eastern governments are currently threatened by terrorists as well.

In a time of war this would be suicide.

Like supporting our allies. We are to blame for what we do, not what terrorists do. We are not responsible for the beheadings of innocent civilians.

I am so tired of individuals on this site claiming “We should” “You must” “We must” there are no absolutes.

Yes, they do whine and blame everyone else for their backwardness and poverty instead of looking at their Medieval mind-set. Thay are responsible for what they do and do not do, period.

Chuckle, convince the terrorists of this.

Ever used paper? Ever eat meat. Ever wear leather? If so, please do not be a hypocrit.

Oh, please, the liberal whine all over again. They will only allow us to live in peace if we kick their asses and keep kicking their asses.

THANK YOU LOGO!! VOICE OF REASON!!

I’ve never read bigger lies in my life!

July 22, 2005 Friday
3 EDITION

SECTION: MAIN; Pg. A19

LENGTH: 741 words

HEADLINE: FIGHTING WORDS MUST BE EXPOSED

BYLINE: By THOMAS FRIEDMAN

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/friedman/