I believe it is this, Gender and Sex, 2.5 dimensional.
Authoritarian deep down I believe you have brains and are above average IQ. What I mean by this is your brain physically and genetically has more intelligence capacity in it than a normie. That is to say I believe you are limiting yourself with this Culture-war bullshit and outdated views on gender.
I believe Gender and Sex are 2.5 dimensional and I can prove this is a superior model to the Steven Crowder model.
As you can see this is purely scientific, looking at gender from a scientific lens rather than pop-culture perspectives and emotions. The only emotions are the emotions of an engineer building a masterpiece, the emotions of seeing machines functioning smoothly and logic being flawless.
If you can improve this model, or point out any flaws of this model LMK.
.
Notes:
The Futa pic was too large to fit in the center that is why its offset like that.
It is 2.5 dimensional not 2 dimensional, for example there is a “Female-Woman” category.
True futa would have both genitals, making them in the middle of both categories.
True full futa would have both genitals and able to homosexually reproduce.
True full and total futa would have both genitals, able to homosexually reproduce and self-reproduce.
My Futa society is not a true futa, but are just futa-looking males.. true futa might have genetic problems of not enough biodiversity.
I don’t use the term “reproduce asexually” because it is overridden by the word “asexual” which doesn’t mean the same thing.
I have a bit of a dilemma. I don’t believe that biological males should be in personal female spaces. I don’t think it is fair on females at all.
But.. take one of my favourite YouTubers, Fran Blanche:
I just can’t think of her as a man at all, I remember being surprised when I found out she wasn’t biologically a woman. If Fran was to enter a female space, I doubt that she would cause any upset or act creepy, and she would probably go completely unnoticed.
Looks like a man with long hair, which is what he is. Maybe HE isn’t creepy to YOU. So what? If men are allowed into women-only spaces then it means there are no women-only spaces. Women would legally have no right to object. Why are you putting your two cents worth in anyway? How does it affect you, as a man? How are women supposed to know who’s creepy and who isn’t? ANY man in womanface who wants to use women’s toilets and changing rooms is a creep by default.
And your friend there comes across as pretty creepy to me. No one is going to stop these men from going into women’s toilets etc. The POINT is that if they can do it freely then every man can and all that does is embolden the perverts.
People just don’t get it. No woman is going to stop ANY man. How could she?
It’s women’s business and no one else’s. If women want their own places separate from men then they have every right to fight for that. If men can LEGALLY call themselves women then the word ‘woman’ has no meaning.
But did you watch any of the video Vic? Hear her talk? If someone like that came into the ladies, I seriously don’t think you would notice.
I’m just raising the point, in what I believe to be the correct topic, you’re right, it doesn’t affect me, but I’m not stating anything one way or the other, I’m just asking a question..
Yes, I did, for as long as I needed to. That’s not a woman’s voice, and have you also heard of filters? They can change the voice as well as the face. You should see what many of these people look like in reality versus the profile photos Plus you can’t tell from a video. In person you would see all kinds of maleness. They have different EVERYTHING. Hands, feet, shape, adam’s apple, hairline, almost universally taller, more muscular….
Yes, I noticed Mr Brown and Beige’s hands and wrists and he looks like he has the propensity to early baldness.
There is a serious lack of an understanding of womanhood on this Forum.
Disturbing.
So now you believe in the Talmud? It’s so obviously a modern manipulation of what was written. I don’t even need to bother researching it. You only need to look at the wording
‘‘Identified female at birth but later developing male characteristics through human intervention’’???
Right. That REALLY sounds like the way they would have spoken thousands of years ago. For Fuck Sake!
So you want quotes, tenzin. I thought you didn’t believe in the Talmud? Do you think there are eight sexes? Really?
‘‘The claim that the Talmud recognizes eight distinct “genders” is considered a significant misinterpretation or deliberate rebranding of Talmudic terminology by many traditional scholars and critics. While progressive scholars sometimes highlight these terms to promote gender diversity in Judaism, traditional interpretations hold that the Talmudic discussions focus on biological, physical, and legal statuses—not gender identity.
The Talmudic terms often cited (Zachar, Nekevah, Androgynos, Tumtum, Aylonit, Saris) refer to biological sexual characteristics, not cultural or self-identified gender.
Androgynos: A person with both male and female genital characteristics.
Tumtum: A person with indeterminate or hidden sexual characteristics (often due to a membrane covering the genitals).
Aylonit/Saris: These refer to individuals born with female or male anatomy who do not develop secondary sex characteristics (e.g., puberty) or are infertile, often due to natural causes or injury. ‘‘
They weren’t blind. They were obviously talking about sexual anomalies, dickhead.
3 older sisters.
Female friends.
Many girlfriends, still friends.
More female friends.
Several female heroes.
Never once judged anyone’s capabilities by gender.
“(Disturbing) Lack of an understanding of womanhood.”
You can shove that right up your arse. I just asked an innocent question from a male perspective, if you choose to get all uppity about it, then that’s your problem, but don’t tell me I know nothing about / don’t understand women, because then you will be talking shit. I posted my question in “The Spectrum of Womanhood”, regarding “The Spectrum of Womanhood”. It could only be asked from a male perspective BECAUSE I AM A MALE. If you both can’t even talk about it objectively and give your insight without getting all offended and jumping to conclusions, then you can fuck off. That’s not misogyny, that’s full equal rights, I would have told any man the same.
I would expect it from Vic, who just loves to get the knives out, but after that amazing post you made on feminism from your perspective, reason4emotion, I don’t understand it from you.
I’m not going to apologise for being a man, I’ve done nothing to add to the female dilemma.
Man has sisters, a mother, and knows some women; ergo he knows everything there is to know about being a woman. Heck, he even knows when a man is a woman!
I didn’t say I knew about being a woman, Victor, I said that I have no fucking bias concerning it. Stop talking shit and guessing what I am saying if you are too dense to understand.
Plus you can’t tell from a video. In person you would see all kinds of maleness. They have different EVERYTHING. Hands, feet, shape, adam’s apple, hairline, almost universally taller, more muscular….
